CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05203562Updated Jul 12, 2022

Letrozole as a Prophylaxis From GTN for Complete Mole Patients

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Suction evacuation and Letrozole tablets in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, sponsored by Zagazig University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-12.

Sponsored by Zagazig University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2020, registered Jan 2022).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) in patients with complete hydatidiform mole (CHM)

Read the detailed description

Management of hydatidiform mole is usually evacuation followed by β-hcg surveillance to early detect cases of GTN . The risk of developing GTN is reported to be 16% to 20% in women with CHM . GTN is a potentially life-threatening malignancy but has an excellent cure rate. Trials were conducted to assess the role of prophylactic chemotherapy to prevent the development of GTN. In addition to their side effects, a meta-analysis concluded that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of prophylactic chemotherapy in clinical practice. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole have been shown to successfully block estrogen production in women of reproductive age. Their safety, high tolerability, low cost, and associated minimal adverse effects have all been established over several decades of clinical use and recently used successfully alone in the medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy making marked degenerative effects on the placenta.

The study hypothesizes that by inhibiting the estrogen synthetase (the aromatase enzyme) progesterone would not exert its physiological role in maintaining early pregnancy including complete hydatidiform mole. Thus, using a prophylactic aromatase inhibitor after CHM may have a role in the prevention of GTN and more effective clearance of β-hcg.

Rational GTN is a potentially life-threatening malignancy. The risk of progression of CHM to GTN is 20%. Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor may decrease the incidence of GTN.

Research question:

Is prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM

Hypothesis Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM

Aim of this work The study aims at figuring out whether prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM.

OBJECTIVES

  • To assess the incidence of GTN after the evacuation of CHM without prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor.
  • To assess the incidence of GTN after the evacuation of CHM without prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor.
  • To assess the side effects of aromatase inhibitor when used as a prophylaxis against GTN development in CHM cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Technical design:

  • Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Sample size: 200 patients diagnosed to have CHM by ultrasound and confirmed by histopathological examination.

Operational design:

  • Type of the study: a randomized controlled trial.
  • Steps of performance and techniques that will be used

women included in the study will be subjected to the following

Preoperative

  1. Complete history taking.
  2. General and abdominal examination.
  3. Routine preoperative laboratory investigations.
  4. Ultrasound to diagnose complete hydatidiform mole.
  5. Measurement of β-hcg level. Intraoperative

    • Evacuation of CHM using Suction curettage.
    • Tissues obtained during an evacuation will be sent for histological assessment. Post-operative
    • Women will be randomized classified into two groups
    • Control group I: Conservative follow up
    • Prophylactic letrozole group II 5-mg Letrozole will be administered as two 2.5-mg tablets every day for 10 days.
    • All Patients will receive instruction to return for β-hcg follow up which will be done weekly till complete resolution then monthly for 6 months.
    • Participants will be advised to receive contraception during the follow-up period.
    • The patients who will develop GTN in either group will be picked up and the incidence of GTN will be calculated in each group.
02

Conditions studied

  • Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

Keywords

  • Aromatase Inhibitor; Letrozole; GTN; Complete Mole
03

In context

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Gestational Trophoblastic Disease; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 61 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Gestational Trophoblastic Disease.

Browse Gestational Trophoblastic Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women were diagnosed to have CHM by ultrasound and confirmed by histopathological examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic disease associated with HM at presentation, in which situation chemotherapy, rather than prophylactic treatment, as prescribed,
  • Late diagnosis of CHM made only by histological examination of curetted material
  • Uterine evacuation at another hospital and patient seen at the optimum patient care only for follow up
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group I

    Patients with complete mole treated by evacuation of using suction curettage followed by conservative follow up

    Procedure: Suction evacuation

  • Experimental
    Prophylactic letrozole group II

    Patients with complete mole treated by evacuation of using suction curettage followed by 5mg daily letrozole for 10 days followed by conservative follow up

    Procedure: Suction evacuation · Drug: Letrozole tablets

Interventions

  • ProcedureSuction evacuation

    both groups underwent complete mole evacuation using suction curettage.

    Also known as: Evacuation of CHM using Suction curettage

  • DrugLetrozole tablets

    Group II Patients received 5mg(2tablets 2.5gm) daily letrozole for 10 days after complete mole evacuation

    Also known as: 5mg daily (2 tablets 2.5 gm)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: at the first day of evacuation

  2. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: one month after evacuation

  3. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: two months after evacuation

  4. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: three months after evacuation

  5. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: four months after evacuation

  6. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: Five months after evacuation

  7. (β-hCG) level

    A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: Six months after evacuation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mohamed ALI Alabiad
    Zagazig, Sharkia 14150, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — 3 months after final complete

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05203562
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Responsible party
Mohamed Ali Alabiad, MD (Principal Investigator, Zagazig University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 12, 2022

Study contacts

Mohamed A Alabiad, MD
principal investigator · Zagazig University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion