A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Suction evacuation and Letrozole tablets in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, sponsored by Zagazig University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-12.
Sponsored by Zagazig University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention
Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) in patients with complete hydatidiform mole (CHM)
Management of hydatidiform mole is usually evacuation followed by β-hcg surveillance to early detect cases of GTN . The risk of developing GTN is reported to be 16% to 20% in women with CHM . GTN is a potentially life-threatening malignancy but has an excellent cure rate. Trials were conducted to assess the role of prophylactic chemotherapy to prevent the development of GTN. In addition to their side effects, a meta-analysis concluded that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of prophylactic chemotherapy in clinical practice. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole have been shown to successfully block estrogen production in women of reproductive age. Their safety, high tolerability, low cost, and associated minimal adverse effects have all been established over several decades of clinical use and recently used successfully alone in the medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy making marked degenerative effects on the placenta.
The study hypothesizes that by inhibiting the estrogen synthetase (the aromatase enzyme) progesterone would not exert its physiological role in maintaining early pregnancy including complete hydatidiform mole. Thus, using a prophylactic aromatase inhibitor after CHM may have a role in the prevention of GTN and more effective clearance of β-hcg.
Rational GTN is a potentially life-threatening malignancy. The risk of progression of CHM to GTN is 20%. Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor may decrease the incidence of GTN.
Research question:
Is prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM
Hypothesis Prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM
Aim of this work The study aims at figuring out whether prophylactic use of aromatase inhibitor is effective in decreasing the incidence of GTN in patients with CHM.
OBJECTIVES
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Technical design:
Operational design:
women included in the study will be subjected to the following
Preoperative
Measurement of β-hcg level. Intraoperative
38 studies on the registry are indexed under Gestational Trophoblastic Disease; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 61 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Gestational Trophoblastic Disease.
Browse Gestational Trophoblastic Disease studies →Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with complete mole treated by evacuation of using suction curettage followed by conservative follow up
Procedure: Suction evacuation
Patients with complete mole treated by evacuation of using suction curettage followed by 5mg daily letrozole for 10 days followed by conservative follow up
Procedure: Suction evacuation · Drug: Letrozole tablets
both groups underwent complete mole evacuation using suction curettage.
Also known as: Evacuation of CHM using Suction curettage
Group II Patients received 5mg(2tablets 2.5gm) daily letrozole for 10 days after complete mole evacuation
Also known as: 5mg daily (2 tablets 2.5 gm)
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: at the first day of evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: one month after evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: two months after evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: three months after evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: four months after evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: Five months after evacuation
(β-hCG) level
A quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin
Time frame: Six months after evacuation
Plan to share: Yes — 3 months after final complete
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease→
Zagazig University