An interventional study of TASK TRAINING in Hearing Loss, Age Related Hearing Loss and Physical Disability, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-29.
Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
This study aimed to examine the effects of single and dual-task training on physical function, cognitive function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, and activities of daily living in the elderly with age-related hearing loss.
The elderly who were diagnosed with age-related hearing loss in Pamukkale University Health, Practice and Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology participated in the study. The elderly were allocated a single-task training group, dual-task training group, and control group. Thirteen patients in the single-task training group, 15 patients in the dual-task training group, 14 patients in the control group completed the study. Degrees of hearing loss were determined by pure tone audiometry. Evaluations, Senior Fitness Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, World Health Organization- Quality of Life- Old Module, Berg Balance Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale International, Functional Independence Measure, Dual Task Questionnaire, Dual Task Effect, were performed initially, after the interventions and at the 6th month. The interventions were carried out two days a week and 40 minutes, for five weeks.
Outcome Measures Physical function, cognitive function, auditory function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, independence in activities of daily living, and dual-task performance were evaluated. Older adults were evaluated initially, after the dual-task and single-task training, and at 6th month for long-term control. All evaluations and interventions were carried out in an isolated and quiet environment in the examination room of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology.
Interventions A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group, were completed separately in the single-task training group. No intervention was performed in the control group. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week. It has been tried to prevent the learning effect by providing individual and weekly progress according to the patients' performance in the tasks in the motor and cognitive parts. Variable priority instructions were used in the dual-task training group, and fixed priority instructions were used in the single-task training group. At the beginning and end of the intervention programs, 7 types of warm-up and cool-down exercises involving large muscle groups were performed for 10-minutes. Each task in the intervention programs was performed for 60 seconds and/or 10 repetitions.
796 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 193 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 43 is close to the median of 44 across 561 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.
Browse Hearing Loss studies →Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 342 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Tasks were completed separately in the single-task training group
Other: TASK TRAINING
Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group
Other: TASK TRAINING
No intervention was performed in the control group
A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.
Senior Fitness Test
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
Senior Fitness Test
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
Time frame: At 5th week
Senior Fitness Test
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
Time frame: At 5th week
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Pure tone audiometry
Pure tone audiometry at 6 different frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 kHz) frequently mentioned in the literature was performed by an audiologist with a clinical audiometer
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
Time frame: At 5th week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Berg Balance Scale
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
Berg Balance Scale
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
Time frame: At 5th week
Berg Balance Scale
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
International Fall Efficiency Scale
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
International Fall Efficiency Scale
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
Time frame: At 5th week
International Fall Efficiency Scale
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Functional Independence Measurement
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
Functional Independence Measurement
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
Time frame: At 5th week
Functional Independence Measurement
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Dual Task Questionnaire
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
Time frame: Initially, 1st week
Dual Task Questionnaire
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
Time frame: At 5th week
Dual Task Questionnaire
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
Time frame: Through study completion at 6th month
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 24 months.
Of 196 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hearing Loss, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 59. This study's 24 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 321 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 42.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.