An interventional study of EmoLED treatment and current Standard of Care in Ulcer, Acral Nevus and Scleroderma, sponsored by Emoled. Terminated at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-07.
Sponsored by Emoled · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The present clinical study aims to compare, in the two groups of patients with acral ulcers, the reparative process of the injured area, the evaluation of the healing time (with "healing" interpreted as the complete re-epithelization of the wound) and the perception of pain through NRS scale.
This clinical study will be a prospective, randomized controlled study, with the commercial objective of assessing the clinical effectiveness of a portable battery powered device that uses blue LED.
This clinical study aims to compare the existing standard treatment for acral ulcers in patients suffering from scleroderma, to a protocol that provides for the administration of the EmoLED treatment for 16 consecutive weeks in addition to the conventional therapy.
The objective is to determine any differences in outcome between the two groups considered and whether the therapy of the treatment group is a valid alternative to the current therapy in terms of support for the reparative process, speed of healing and pain reduction.
The study protocol also establishes a follow-up period of 4 weeks. If the injury has not healed within the 16 weeks of treatment, the patient will return to the investigator centre for the usual dressing, and the evolution of the injury will be observed for 4 weeks. If the recovery occurs within the 16 weeks of treatment, the patient will return to the investigator centre 4 weeks after recovery, for a check-up, during which the condition of the healed skin area and the presence of any relapses will be evaluated.
In this clinical study, patients with systemic sclerosis with at least one ulcerative lesion on the upper limbs' fingers will be enrolled. In case the patient has more than one lesion, only one will be selected for the study; it will be the one that, in the opinion of the doctor, allows a better recording of data (image acquisition).
The population subject matter of the study is largely representative of the target population, as there are no particular exclusion criteria and the center involved is a structure of excellence in the treatment of acral ulcers of sclerodermal origin.
Scleroderma, or systemic sclerosis, is a chronic systemic disease with autoimmune pathogenesis, characterized by skin and internal organs fibrosis caused by an altered functionality of fibroblasts, the presence of perivascular inflammatory infiltration and small vessel alterations and immune system abnormalities.
The incidence of scleroderma is estimated in about twenty cases per million inhabitants per year. The peak age range for the onset of this disease is between 45 and 65 years and, as often observed in autoimmune diseases, women are more frequently affected with a ratio of 4.5:1.
Scleroderma begins in most cases with the Raynaud's phenomenon, consisting in the change of colour of the extremities, which become initially pale, then cyanotic and finally red.
The most characteristic sign of scleroderma is the thickening of the skin, that can be found at the level of the hands, which can meet a progressive deformity in fingers bending, and then also at the level of the wrists, forearms, face and trunk.
There are still no drugs that can cure scleroderma. The treatments used, therefore, aim to contain the symptoms and to avoid/delay the complications of the disease. The most commonly used drugs include vasodilators, pro-kinetic drugs, antiarrhythmics and immunosuppressants to treat the various complications.
Digital ulcers represent a complication that affects about half of patients with systemic sclerosis. Digital ulcers are mainly the consequence of vascular phenomena typical of the disease (Raynaud phenomenon and endothelial damage) or of its fibrotic evolution (skin sclerosis). They are mainly located at the extremities where peripheral vascular phenomena are more evident, at the level of the areas where the skin is most subjected to traction (e.g. the elbows), or in the areas affected by calcinosis. Ulcerations of the knuckles and fingertips are frequent.
Digital ulcers often develop a chronic trend over time, they have a slow healing, they are intensely painful and can lead to a severe functional limitation, compromising the personal and professional quality of life of the affected person, so much so that it represents one of the most important complications from this point of view, perceived by patients as seriously disabling. This type of ulcers can also lead to infectious complications (osteomyelitis, sepsis of the surrounding soft tissues) that in the most serious cases lead to the necrosis of the local tissue resulting in the amputation of the digital phalanges.
Factors to consider in assessing the type of the ulcer include location and size, margins and edges, wound bed, degree of moisture (exudate), edema (local or diffused), pain assessment and degree of infection. From these factors we can distinguish three types of ulcers: superficial, intermediate and deep. The management of a digital ulcer is particularly complex and may involve a local therapy, a systemic therapeutic approach, or a combined therapy.
359 studies on the registry are indexed under Ulcer; 62 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 65 across 291 interventional studies indexed under Ulcer.
Browse Ulcer studies →Emoled is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
To the Control Group is administered the current standard therapy for 16 weeks.
Procedure: current Standard of Care
The treatment with EmoLED will be carried out once a week in correspondence with the dressing change of the lesion, for sixteen consecutive weeks, for a total of 16 treatments.
Device: EmoLED treatment · Procedure: current Standard of Care
Treatment with the EmoLED device consists of irradiating each area of 5 cm in diameter of the lesion for 60 seconds; if the lesion is larger than 5 cm in diameter, the applications will be repeated up to cover the entire area of interest. EmoLED treatment is additional to the standard therapy for the patient.
The acral lesions will be cleansed with physiological solution, disinfected with a special device and, if necessary, a debridement will be carried out with the most appropriate method.
Number of healed lesions in the two groups
The primary endpoint is the comparison of the outcomes in terms of number of patients with an acral lesion that reach healing (interpreted as the complete re-epitelization of the lesioned area) treated with the standard method (Control Group), versus the number of patients with an acral lesion treated with Emoled and the standard method (Treated Group), at the last visit of the sixteen weeks of observation.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Healing time evaluation
Average healing time (where "healing" means the complete re-epithelization of the observed area) during the overall weeks of observation in the two treatment groups.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Pain evaluation
Percentage of variation of perceived pain in both treatment groups.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Adverse events
Security of treatment (number of related adverse events in the two groups).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Emoled