ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05162261Updated Jan 22, 2025Results posted

to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

An interventional study of Tixel C and LipiFlow in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes and Dry Eye, sponsored by Novoxel Ltd.. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.

Sponsored by Novoxel Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
109
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Randomized, Masked (Evaluator), Controlled, Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® Medical Device, Versus LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Read the detailed description

Randomized, open-label study comparing the Tixel device to LipiFlow System. Up to 110 patients (220 eyes) to be randomized in up to 5 clinical sites in the United States.

Evaluators will be masked as to the randomization assignments. Both eyes will receive the same randomized assignment and both eyes of each patient will be evaluated at all time points.

Data from both eyes will be using in the statistical analysis. The random-effects model adjusts the standard error (SE) and the confidence interval (CI) for within-person correlation between eyes.

Protocol Rev. 7.0 update: Addition of protocol extension to the current protocol: stage 1- main protocol for all patients and stage 2- extension protocol to a sub-group of patients only in the Tixel arm for additional follow-up visit 6 months post last treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Dry Eye
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 109 is above the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Novoxel Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Main Study (Stage1) Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 22 years and older of any gender or race.
  2. Provision of written prior to study participation.
  3. Willingness and ability to return for all study visits.
  4. Reports dry eye symptoms for three months prior to the study.
  5. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between 23-79.
  6. Tear break-up time (TBUT) \<10 seconds in both eyes.
  7. Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications for the time between the treatment visit/s and the final study visit. Ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study.
  8. Reports having to use artificial tears or lubricants regulatory over the past month to relieve dry eye symptoms.
  9. Meibomian gland obstruction in both eyes based on a total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score ≤12 in each eye.
  10. At least 15 glands in each lower eyelid should be expressible, with a sterile cotton swab, at the slit lamp.

Main Study (Stage1) Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of ocular surgery including intraocular, oculo-plastic, corneal or refractive surgery within 6 months.
  2. Patient with giant papillary conjunctivitis.
  3. Patient with punctal plugs or who have had punctal cautery.
  4. Ocular injury or trauma, chemical burns, or limbal stem cell deficiency within 3 months of the baseline examination.
  5. Active ocular herpes zoster or simplex of eye or eyelid or a history of these any time.
  6. Patient who are aphakic.
  7. Cicatricial lid margin disease identified via slit lamp examination, including pemphigoid, symblepharon, etc.
  8. Active ocular infection (e.g., viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, protozoan, or fungal infection of the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, lacrimal sac, or eyelids including a hordeolum or stye).
  9. Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic, recurrent ocular inflammation within prior 3 months (e.g., retinitis, macular inflammation, choroiditis, uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis).
  10. Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, or map dot fingerprint dystrophy).
  11. Lid surface abnormalities (e.g., entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis) that affect lid function in either eye.
  12. Anterior blepharitis (staphylococcal, demodex or seborrheic grade 3 or 4).
  13. Systemic disease conditions that cause dry eye (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vitamin A deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leukemia, Riley-Day syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome).
  14. Use of any of the following medications:

    1. Systemic medication(s) that is known to cause ocular dryness (e.g. antihistamine, diuretics, anti-hypertensives, anti-depressants, hormone therapy) whose dose of this medication(s) has not been stable within 30 days prior to enrolment. There must be no anticipated adjustments to the dose of these medications for the duration of the trial;
    2. Oral tetracyclines or azithromycin within 30 days prior to enrolment; or
    3. Topical anti-glaucoma medications within 30 days prior to enrolment.
    4. Any other systemic medication as per to the Investigator's discretion.
  15. Women in childbearing age who are pregnant, nursing, or not utilizing adequate measures.
  16. Individuals using isotretinoin (Accutane) within 1 year, cyclosporine-A (Restasis) or lifitegrast ophthalmic solution (Xiidra) within 45 days prior to study treatment (day 0), or any other dry eye or MGD medications (antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ) for at least 2 weeks and to maintain abstinence throughout the duration of the study (ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study).
  17. Individuals wearing contact lenses 1 month prior study treatment (day 0), and at any point during the study.
  18. Current skin cancer, malignant sites and/or advanced premalignant lesions or moles in the treatment area.
  19. An impaired immune system condition or use of medication.
  20. Collagen disorders, keloid formation and/or abnormal wound healing.
  21. Previous invasive/ablative procedures in the areas to be treated within 3 months prior to initial treatment or plans for such treatment during the course treatment, or before complete healing of such treatments has occurred.
  22. Any patient who takes or has taken any oral or topical medications, such as but not limited to topical retinoid (e.g., Retin-A), chemical peels, Latisse, Lash Boost which may cause fragile skin or impaired skin healing in the treatment area during the last 3 months and in the entire study period.
  23. Any patient who has a history of bleeding coagulopathies.
  24. Any patient who has tattoos or permanent makeup in the treated area.
  25. Any patient who has burned, blistered, irritated, or sensitive skin in any of the areas to be treated.
  26. Individuals using another ophthalmic device or agent within 30 days of study participation.
  27. Any of the following dry eye treatments:

    1. Office-based dry eye treatment (e.g. IPL, LipiFlow, iLux, TearCare, Tixel, etc.) within 12 months prior to enrolment;
    2. Meibomian gland expression within 6 months prior to enrolment;
    3. Blephex or debridement within 3 months prior to enrollment is an exclusion;
    4. Punctal occlusion or punctal plug placement within 30 days prior to enrolment;
    5. Use of iTear or TrueTear device within the past 2 weeks. (Subjects must refrain from using these devices for the duration of the study.); or
    6. Any history of meibomian gland probing
  28. Use of at-home warm compresses or lid hygiene products while participating in study.
  29. IOP higher than 19 mmHg.
  30. Use of Botulinum-Toxin in the last 6 months prior to the treatment in the treatment area.
  31. Any co-existing condition, either ocular or non-ocular that, in the judgement of the investigator, could affect the safety or effectiveness of treatment or the compliance of the subject to the protocol.

Study Extension (Stage 2)- Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who have completed the main study CLN 0858 (stage 1) in the Tixel arm.
  • TBUT -change from baseline in 1-month FU or 3-months FU was 2.5 seconds or above at least in one eye in the main study.
  • Provision of written informed consent for stage 2.
  • Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications for the time in the extension study. Ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study.

Study Extension (Stage 2)-Exclusion Criteria

* Same as in the main study (stage 1).

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
109 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tixel Group

    Screening and baseline visits, Treatment- 3 treatment sessions, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire.

    Device: Tixel C

  • Active comparator
    LipiFlow

    LipiFlow: Screening and baseline visits,Treatment session, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1and 3 months after the last treatment visit. Subject will be questioned about Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (self-assessed) and OSDI questionnaire.

    Device: LipiFlow

Interventions

  • DeviceTixel C

    Tixel C by Novoxel®, Israel is a thermomechanical system developed for fractional treatment. The system is designed for the treatment of soft tissue by direct conduction of heat, enabling tissue coagulation combined with micro ablation with low thermal damage to the surrounding tissue.

  • DeviceLipiFlow

    Thermal pulsation (LipiFlow) consists of the localized application of heat and therapeutic pressure on the four eyelids (upper and lower) with the aim of improving drainage of the Meibomian glands.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam

    Change from baseline to the 4-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater. TBUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders. Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows: Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after last treatment (8 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (4 weeks post baseline).

  2. Comparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events

    Comparison of the incidence of device-related Ocular adverse events for the two treatment arms

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Patient OSDI

    Change from baseline in patient symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of dry eye disease. OSDI Questionnaire The questionnaire consists of 12 questions divided into three subscales: Ocular Symptoms Visual Functioning Environmental Triggers Scoring System The scoring for the OSDI is based on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Each question is scored as follows: 0: None of the time 1. Some of the time 2. Half of the time 3. Most of the time 4. All of the time Interpretation of OSDI Scores The OSDI scores are generally interpreted as follows: 0-12: Normal or no dry eye 13-22: Mild dry eye 23-32: Moderate dry eye 33-100: Severe dry eye

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

  2. Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 12-weeks Follow-up Exam

    Changes from baseline to the 12-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater. BUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders. Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows: Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

  3. Changes in MGS to 4-weeks and 12-weeks Follow-up Exam

    score on a scale at baseline, 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam in Meibomian Gland (MGS), as assessed by a masked rater. The Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) is a clinical tool used to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands. Scoring Criteria Each gland is assessed and scored based on the quality of the expressed secretion: 0: No secretion 1. Inspissated 2. Cloudy 3. Clear liquid Interpretation of MGS Minimal MGS score = 0 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Maximal MGS score = 45 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Low MGS: (below 12) Indicates poor function or obstruction of the meibomian glands, suggesting MGD.

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

  4. Score on a Scale During Treatment Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (Each Self-assessed by VAS)

    Discomfort and Pain from the treatment (Tixel or LipiFlow) using the questionnaires assessed by the subject. These are visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires using a scale from 0-10 to assess eye discomfort and pain. Both questionnaires are to be self-assessed by the patient immediately following treatment. Interpetation for the assessment: score 0- no discomfort / pain score 5 - moderate discomfort / pain score 10 - worst possible discomfort / pain

    Time frame: Tixel arm: 4 weeks (treatment 1- day 0, treatment 2- 2 weeks, treatment 3- 4 weeks). LipiFlow arm: On treatment day - day 0 (only one treatment for this arm)

  5. Corneal Fluorescein Staining Slit Lamp Evaluation Scores and Change From Baseline

    Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments: Ocular Surface Staining (to evaluate the integrity of the corneal epithelium by identifying areas of damage or staining) Grading scale: 0 = Normal - No staining 1. = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining 2. = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas 3. = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches 5 regions (superior, temporal, central, nasal, and inferior) are graded for each eye. total score range from 0 -15.

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

  6. The Mean Changes From Baseline in IOP for All Eyes on the Tixel and Lipiflow Arms

    Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for: Intraocular Pressure

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

  7. Ocular Surface Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Changes From Baseline

    Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments: Lissamine staining scores (to assess the health of the conjunctival and corneal epithelium, particularly in dry eye disease, by identifying areas of damaged or dead cells). Grading scale: 0 = Normal - No staining 1. = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining 2. = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas 3. = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches 6 regions (nasal, superior nasal, inferior nasal, temporal, superior temporal, inferior temporal) are graded for each eye. The total score range for each eye is 0-18.

    Time frame: Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).

Other outcomes

  1. Extension Study Endpoint 1

    Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by OSDI parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)

  2. Extension Study Endpoint 2

    Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by TBUT parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)

  3. Extension Study Endpoint 3

    Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by MGSS parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)

07

Results

Posted Jan 22, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTixel GroupLipiFlow
Started5455
Completed4553
Not completed92

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam

Change from baseline to the 4-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater. TBUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders. Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows: Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after last treatment (8 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (4 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 4-weeks Follow-up Exam
secondsTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baseline4.3 ± 1.54.6 ± 1.8
change from baseline - 4 weeks FU3.0 ± 3.22.7 ± 2.7
PrimaryComparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events

Comparison of the incidence of device-related Ocular adverse events for the two treatment arms

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Comparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events
participantsTixel GroupLipiFlow
Comparison of the Incidence of Device-related Ocular Adverse Events00
SecondaryChanges in Patient OSDI

Change from baseline in patient symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of dry eye disease. OSDI Questionnaire The questionnaire consists of 12 questions divided into three subscales: Ocular Symptoms Visual Functioning Environmental Triggers Scoring System The scoring for the OSDI is based on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Each question is scored as follows: 0: None of the time 1. Some of the time 2. Half of the time 3. Most of the time 4. All of the time Interpretation of OSDI Scores The OSDI scores are generally interpreted as follows: 0-12: Normal or no dry eye 13-22: Mild dry eye 23-32: Moderate dry eye 33-100: Severe dry eye

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes in Patient OSDI
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baseline50.2 ± 18.349.4 ± 15.5
Change 1 month - Baseline-26.4 ± 21.1-18.8 ± 21.0
Change 3 months - Baseline-28.6 ± 22.4-21.9 ± 18.5
SecondaryChanges in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 12-weeks Follow-up Exam

Changes from baseline to the 12-weeks follow-up exam in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT), as assessed by a masked rater. BUT - Tear Break-Up Time, is a clinical test used to evaluate the stability of the tear film on the surface of the eye. It measures the time it takes for dry spots to appear on the cornea after a blink. A shorter TBUT indicates a more unstable tear film, which can be a sign of dry eye disease or other ocular surface disorders. Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) is typically scored by the time (in seconds). The general interpretation of TBUT scores is as follows: Normal TBUT: More than 10 seconds Borderline TBUT: 5 to 10 seconds Abnormal/Low TBUT: Less than 5 seconds

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Changes in Tear Break Up Times (TBUT) to the 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
secondsTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baseline4.3 ± 1.54.6 ± 1.8
TBUT change from baseline to 12 weeks FU3.1 ± 4.33.3 ± 3.6
SecondaryChanges in MGS to 4-weeks and 12-weeks Follow-up Exam

score on a scale at baseline, 4-weeks and 12-weeks follow-up exam in Meibomian Gland (MGS), as assessed by a masked rater. The Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) is a clinical tool used to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands. Scoring Criteria Each gland is assessed and scored based on the quality of the expressed secretion: 0: No secretion 1. Inspissated 2. Cloudy 3. Clear liquid Interpretation of MGS Minimal MGS score = 0 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Maximal MGS score = 45 in each eye (15 glands evaluated in each eye) Low MGS: (below 12) Indicates poor function or obstruction of the meibomian glands, suggesting MGD.

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes in MGS to 4-weeks and 12-weeks Follow-up Exam
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baeline7.2 ± 2.57.4 ± 2.6
Change 1 Month- Baseline9.0 ± 10.47.3 ± 8.8
Change 3 Months - Baseline11.3 ± 11.410.5 ± 12.2
SecondaryScore on a Scale During Treatment Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (Each Self-assessed by VAS)

Discomfort and Pain from the treatment (Tixel or LipiFlow) using the questionnaires assessed by the subject. These are visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires using a scale from 0-10 to assess eye discomfort and pain. Both questionnaires are to be self-assessed by the patient immediately following treatment. Interpetation for the assessment: score 0- no discomfort / pain score 5 - moderate discomfort / pain score 10 - worst possible discomfort / pain

Time frame:
Tixel arm: 4 weeks (treatment 1- day 0, treatment 2- 2 weeks, treatment 3- 4 weeks). LipiFlow arm: On treatment day - day 0 (only one treatment for this arm)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Score on a Scale During Treatment Discomfort and Pain Questionnaires (Each Self-assessed by VAS)
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Discomfort Treatment 1 -OD2.8 ± 1.91.5 ± 1.6
Discomfort Treatment 1 -OS2.6 ± 1.81.7 ± 2.1
Discomfort Treatment 2 - OD2.7 ± 1.8—
Discomfort Treatment 2 - OS2.6 ± 1.7—
Discomfort treatment 3 -OD2.5 ± 2.0—
Discomfort treatment 3 -OS2.5 ± 2.0—
Pain- Treatment 1 -OD2.5 ± 1.90.8 ± 1.2
Pain- Treatment 1-OS2.5 ± 1.90.9 ± 1.5
Pain - Treatment 2 -OD2.5 ± 1.9—
Pain - Treatment 2- OS2.3 ± 1.8—
Pain - Treatment 3 -OD2.2 ± 2.0—
Pain - Treatment 3 -OS2.2 ± 1.9—
SecondaryCorneal Fluorescein Staining Slit Lamp Evaluation Scores and Change From Baseline

Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments: Ocular Surface Staining (to evaluate the integrity of the corneal epithelium by identifying areas of damage or staining) Grading scale: 0 = Normal - No staining 1. = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining 2. = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas 3. = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches 5 regions (superior, temporal, central, nasal, and inferior) are graded for each eye. total score range from 0 -15.

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Corneal Fluorescein Staining Slit Lamp Evaluation Scores and Change From Baseline
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baseline3.1 ± 2.42.9 ± 2.2
Post Treatment 12.1 ± 2.12.0 ± 1.9
Post Treatment 21.4 ± 1.6—
Post Treatment 30.9 ± 1.3—
1 Month Follow-up1.2 ± 1.91.5 ± 1.6
3 Months Follow up1.3 ± 2.21.3 ± 1.8
Change 1 Month - Baseline-1.9 ± 2.3-1.4 ± 2.2
Change 3 Months - Baseline-1.7 ± 2.3-1.6 ± 2.1
SecondaryThe Mean Changes From Baseline in IOP for All Eyes on the Tixel and Lipiflow Arms

Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for: Intraocular Pressure

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Mean Changes From Baseline in IOP for All Eyes on the Tixel and Lipiflow Arms
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Baseline13.3 ± 2.413.5 ± 2.8
Change in IOP (mmHG) from Baseline to 1 month follow up0.4 ± 2.50.2 ± 2.5
change in IOP (mmHG) from Baseline to 3 months follow up0.1 ± 2.70.3 ± 2.4
SecondaryOcular Surface Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Changes From Baseline

Changes from baseline following treatment for the test and control devices for the following assessments: Lissamine staining scores (to assess the health of the conjunctival and corneal epithelium, particularly in dry eye disease, by identifying areas of damaged or dead cells). Grading scale: 0 = Normal - No staining 1. = Mild - Superficial stippling micropunctate staining 2. = Moderate - Macropunctate staining with some coalescent areas 3. = Severe - Numerous coalescent macropunctate areas and/or patches 6 regions (nasal, superior nasal, inferior nasal, temporal, superior temporal, inferior temporal) are graded for each eye. The total score range for each eye is 0-18.

Time frame:
Tixel arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after last treatment (16 weeks post baseline). LipiFlow arm: Baseline to 12 weeks after treatment (12 weeks post baseline).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Ocular Surface Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Changes From Baseline
score on a scaleTixel GroupLipiFlow
Basline2.4 ± 2.82.4 ± 2.5
Change from baseline to 1 month FU-0.9 ± 2.3-1.2 ± 2.7
Change from baseline to 3 months FU-1.3 ± 2.7-1.2 ± 3.0
Other pre-specifiedExtension Study Endpoint 1

Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by OSDI parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Extension Study Endpoint 1
score on a scaleTixel Group
Baseline46.2 ± 19.7
6 months FU visit21.9 ± 19.4
6 months FU score change from baseline-24.3 ± 26.5
Other pre-specifiedExtension Study Endpoint 2

Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by TBUT parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Extension Study Endpoint 2
secondsTixel Group
Baseline4.0 ± 1.5
6 months FU visit9.2 ± 4.0
change from baseline - 6 months FU visit5.2 ± 3.8
Other pre-specifiedExtension Study Endpoint 3

Durability of the clinical benefit effect at 6-months FU visit assessed by MGSS parameter for a Tixel sub-group population only.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months post-last treatment (7 months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Extension Study Endpoint 3
score on a scaleTixel Group
Baseline6.6 ± 2.3
6 months FU visit24.8 ± 10.9
change from baseline at 6 months FU visit18.2 ± 10.9

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months and 10 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tixel Group0/53 (0%)4/53 (7.5%)6/53 (11.3%)
LipiFlow0/53 (0%)1/53 (1.9%)4/53 (7.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTixel GroupLipiFlow
Retinal DetachmentEye disorders1/530/53
Operculated Retinal HoleEye disorders1/530/53
facial melanoma in situNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/531/53
SepsisInfections and infestations1/530/53
Infectious L5/S1 spondylodiscitisInfections and infestations1/530/53
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTixel GroupLipiFlow
Abdominal massGastrointestinal disorders1/530/53
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/530/53
COVID-19Infections and infestations1/530/53
HyprtensionVascular disorders0/531/53
MastoiditisInfections and infestations1/530/53
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/531/53
Conjunctival cystEye disorders0/531/53
Conjunctivitis allergicEye disorders0/531/53
Conjunctivitis viralInfections and infestations1/530/53
Corneal abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/530/53

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all randomized subjects. Subjects were analyzed as randomized.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
Mean61.9 ± 12.461.7 ± 12.861.8 ± 12.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
Female373572
Male172037
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
Hispanic or Latino5510
Not Hispanic or Latino495099
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian134
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American112
White5051101
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
United States5455109
Ftzpatrick skin type
Ftzpatrick skin type(Participants)Tixel GroupLipiFlowTotal
Type 1112
Type 2181735
Type 3152136
Type 4161329
Type 5325
Type 6112
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Visionary Research Institute
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Moyes Eye Center
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Ophthalmology Associates
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • PNV Clinical Research, LLC
    Texas City, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05162261
Lead sponsor
Novoxel Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2021
Start date
Sep 19, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 26, 2023
Completion
Sep 28, 2023
Results posted
Jan 22, 2025
Last update
Jan 22, 2025

Study contacts

Gregg Berdy, MD
principal investigator · Ophthalmology Associates 12990 Manchester Rd., Ste. 200 St. Louis, MO 63131 314-966-3377

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion