ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05159115Updated Feb 2, 2022

Sucrase-isomaltase Deficiency as a Cause of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

An interventional study of Low-FODMAP diet and Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Sucrose Intolerance Due to Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency and Carbohydrate; Malabsorption, sponsored by Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-02.

Sponsored by Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder causing troublesome symptoms and reduced quality of life. It affects 10-20% of the population, hence creates large costs for society. About 30-40% of all IBS patients do not benefit from current treatment options. Sucrase-isomaltase (SI) deficiency is an unexplored condition, that may explain symptoms in IBS patients who experience no effect from today's treatments. Currently, a duodenal biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SI deficiency, however the condition is not well investigated. A 13C-labelled breath test holds promise as a non-invasive alternative, but it has not previously been validated.

This project will address the knowledge gap related to a possible association between SI deficiency and IBS by addressing two research questions that have never been answered before. We aim to:

  1. Validate the 13C-labelled breath test as a diagnostic tool by assessing the strength of the association between the breath test and SI activity measured in duodenal biopsies
  2. Use the 13C-labelled breath test in a randomized dietary crossover trial comparing a starch and sucrose reduced diet (SSRD) with the standard low-FODMAP diet in IBS patients, to evaluate whether SI activity is associated with dietary changes according to symptom severity and gut microbiota composition
Read the detailed description

The projects includes two studies:

Study 1: Validation of the 13C-labelled breath test to diagnose sucrase-isomaltase deficiency

Background: In order to validate the 13C-sucrose breath test to diagnose SI deficiency, the test result must be compared to the "gold standard" method for diagnosis; i.e. measurements of enzyme activity from intestinal biopsies by "The Dahlquist Method", and a reference material must be established.

Objective: To compare results from the 13C-labelled breath test to enzyme activity measured in biopsies collected from the proximal small intestine in a limited patient group referred for a gastroscopic examination.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Primary endpoint: SI activity as measured with a breath test and enzyme activity with assay of biopsy material.

Recruitment and patient characteristics: Patients referred for gastroscopic examination with duodenal biopsies and with suspected GI disorder, will be included consecutively.

Sample size: We aim to include 40 patients. No studies validating breath test results in our patient group are available. However, based on preliminary results suggesting that 35% of IBS patients have SI deficiency,13 we are 95% likely to find between 8 and 21 patients with SI deficiency when examining 40 patients. Assuming 80% concordance between the two methods to (correct proportion of successes), we would need 12 positive cases. Thus, if 40 individuals are included, the study is sufficiently powered (alpha=5% and beta=20%, using McNemar's test of concordance).

Study 2: Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency as a cause of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Objectives: To examine the effect of a 4-week SSRD on GI- and extraintestinal symptoms, gut microbiota composition and fecal fermentation in patients with IBS (with and without SI deficiency), and compare the SSRD with a 4-week low-FODMAP diet to investigate whether the patients with a breath test result indicating SI deficiency respond better to the SSRD than the patients with normal SI activity. Gut microbiota have been suggested to have a central role in IBS etiology, hence evaluation of gut microbiota composition and fecal fermentation will be included to increase the knowledge regarding the effects of dietary change on gut microbiota composition and activity related to SI deficiency.

Design: A randomized, open clinical crossover trial with a dietary intervention in a group of IBS patients, lasting for 4+4 weeks (SSRD vs. low-FODMAP) with a 1-week wash-out period in between. Breath tests will be taken at inclusion, but the results will be "blinded", e.g. not available for anyone conducting the trial before end of the study. A SSRD will be compared to the low-FODMAP diet. All participants will be given dietary advice from a registered clinical dietitian. Briefly, all forms of sucrose-containing foods (e.g. sweets, jam, and cakes) should be avoided, and foods rich in starch should be reduced on the SSRD.

Primary endpoint: Symptom severity by IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS).

Secondary endpoints: Gut microbiota composition, fecal fermentation measured by short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and assessment of quality of life by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29).

Recruitment and patient characteristics: IBS patients referred to the outpatient clinic at the Department of Gastroenterology at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital for dietary guidance by a registered dietitian will be consecutively included.

Sample size: The primary end point is change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) at the end of the treatment period relative to baseline, and the proportion of responders to the dietary intervention is based on the recommended cut-off of a reduction (ie, improvement) in total IBS-SSS score of 50 points, which is considered to be clinically meaningful improvement. To plan our sample size, we performed a power calculation based on the ability to detect a difference between the two diets in reduction of IBS-SSS score of at least 50 points with 80% power, assuming an SD of 100. The calculation indicated that we would need 64 patients. To allow for 15-20% drop-out, we aim to include 80 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Sucrose Intolerance Due to Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency
  • Carbohydrate; Malabsorption
  • Sucrase Isomaltase Deficiency
  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,116 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 70 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Validation of the 13C-labelled breath test to diagnose sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (n=40)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed
  • 18-30 kg/m2
  • Referred for gastroscopic examination with suspected GI disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or not capable of signing the informed consent

Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency as a cause of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (n=80)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m2
  • IBS diagnosis according to Rome IV criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or diabetes mellitus
  • Chronic immune diseases affecting the GI-system
  • Unwilling/unable to maintain a stable diet throughout the study period
  • Use of antibiotic treatment for the last 4 weeks
  • Currently on a restrictive diet
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low-FODMAP diet

    Patients with IBS on a 4-week low-FODMAP diet.

    Other: Low-FODMAP diet

  • Experimental
    Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet

    Patients with IBS on a s 4-week Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD).

    Other: Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD)

Interventions

  • OtherLow-FODMAP diet

    4 weeks of a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs)

  • OtherStarch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD)

    4 weeks of a diet low in starch and sucrose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. IBS symptom severity

    Symptom severity measured by the IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gut microbiota composition

    Analysis of fecal samples for evaluation of microbiota composition in fecal samples collected at baseline and after each 4-week diet intervention

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Fecal fermentation measured by short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)

    Analysis of SCFAs in fecal samples collected at baseline and after each 4-week diet intervention

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Quality of life in IBS

    Assessment of quality of life by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05159115
Lead sponsor
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 15, 2021
Start date
Mar 14, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 2, 2022

Study contacts

Jørgen Valeur, PhD
Contact
jorgen.valeur@lds.no
0047 23225140

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion