CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05146635Updated Jan 11, 2022

Optimal Adjuvant Intravesical Therapy for Intermediate Risk Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Intravesical Bcg and Intravesical chemotherapy (epirubicin) in Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Mansoura University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-11.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial is to identify the optimal adjuvant intravesical therapy in patients with intermediate risk (IR) non muscle invasive bladder cancer by comparing two commonly utilized intravesical regimens; intravesical immunotherapy (BCG) and intravesical chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

Bladder cancer (BC) represents a frequent urologic malignancy, and is mainly diagnosed as non-muscle invasive, At presentation, approximately 30% of patients have muscle-invasive BC (clinical T2 or higher) .

Both the natural history of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and its treatment strategies are highly variable. Although some patients never experience disease recurrence, others experience disease progression and eventually die of their disease .

In the absence of intravesical treatment, a patient with non-muscle-invasive BC has a 47% probability of disease recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis and a 9% probability of progression to muscle-invasive disease .

Low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with NMIBC (Ta, T1, and CIS). Treatment of NMIBC is now relatively well-defined for high-risk and low-risk disease presentation, and awaits further refinement through improvements in therapeutic options .

Solitary low-grade tumors, especially smaller lesions (3 cm or less), respond best to resection and immediate instillation of intravesical agents, whereas higher risk lesions, such as carcinoma in situ and high-grade T1 stage disease, have demonstrated good response to BCG when given on a schedule of induction (an initial 6-week course) and maintenance (3-weekly courses every 6 months for 3 years) .

However, while low- and high-risk diseases have been well-classified, the intermediate-risk (IR) category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group of patients that do not fit into either of these categories . As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as 'intermediate-risk' as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population .

The pathology of IR NMIBC has been defined by different organizations (American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and International Consultation on Urological Diseases) as those patients with recurrent (\<1 year) low-grade Ta disease, solitary low-grade Ta >3cm, multifocal low-grade Ta disease or high-grade Ta disease \<3 cm .

Current recommendations for therapy from the aforementioned organizations suggest a basic role for induction and maintenance therapy with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Data from a number of recent trials suggest that BCG with maintenance is superior to maintenance chemotherapy in this population as regard to recurrence free survival. On the other hand, no significant benefit of BCG compared with chemotherapy for tumor progression was identified.

Most of these studies were limited by its heterogeneity of patients (non-standardized definition of IR) and non-unified regimen of intravesical treatment (course or utilized chemotherapeutic agent). A well-designed randomized controlled trial with a rigorous methodology is warranted to provide a solid evidence for best practice in this special group of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Intravesical therapy
  • Recurrence
  • Progression
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 60 across 1,163 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (aged >18 years)
  • Patients with primary or recurrent papillary NMIBC.
  • Complete TURBT.
  • Patients with IR NMIBC confirmed by histopathology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent.
  • Patients with history of previous radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy.
  • Patients suffering from immuno-deficiency or other malignancies.
  • Patients with history of hypersensitivity reaction to BCG or epirubicin.
  • Examination under anesthesia (EUA) reveals palpable bladder mass.
  • Patients with low or high risk NMIBC by histopathology
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intravesical immunotherapy (BCG) group

    Drug: Intravesical Bcg

  • Active comparator
    Intravesical chemotherapy (Epirubicin) group

    Drug: Intravesical chemotherapy (epirubicin)

Interventions

  • DrugIntravesical Bcg

    Patients will receive induction and maintenance BCG after complete TURBT.

  • DrugIntravesical chemotherapy (epirubicin)

    Patients will receive induction and maintenance epirubicin after complete TURBT.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumor recurrence rate

    Number of patient who will develop Recurrence rate during follow up

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Tumor Progression rate

    Number of patient who will develop Progression rate during follow up

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Side effects from intravesical treatments

    Side effects from intravesical treatments

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05146635
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy (Lecturer of Urology, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2022

Study contacts

Amr A Elsawy
Contact
amrelsawy.unc@hotmail.com
01009428750
Mahmoud Laymon
Contact
dr_mahmoudlaymon@yahoo.com
Amr A Elsawy
principal investigator · Mansoura University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion