ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05144191Updated May 18, 2026

Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study

An interventional study of Insignia uncemented Hip Stem in Hip Osteoarthritis, Avascular Necrosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Stryker Orthopaedics. Active, not recruiting at 11 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-18.

Sponsored by Stryker Orthopaedics (part of Stryker) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
313
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 155 studies in Osteoarthritis, Hip with a site in United States — 21 open to participants now, 32 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Osteoarthritis, Hip · United States.

Enrollment
28th of 118
313 · median 105
Started
2022
with 8 others
No phase
76 of 155
12 open now
Primary completion
2034-04
later than 28 of 31 live
Registered
127th of 155
by date

Among the 155 studies in Osteoarthritis, Hip with a site in United States, this one is the 28th largest by enrollment of the 118 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 9 that started in 2022, is one of 76 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 28 of the 31 other live ones, and was the 127th registered.

Osteoarthritis, Hip

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Open to participants now

21 of the 155 studies in Osteoarthritis, Hip with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

16 more — sign in →

All 21 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 87 Osteoarthritis, Hip studies recruiting now, 54 (62%) set no upper age limit and 7 (8%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 6 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 155 studies in Osteoarthritis, Hip with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for global market access and post-market clinical follow-up up to 10 years postoperative.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, post-market, multi-center clinical investigation of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a consecutive series of patients who meet the eligibility criteria. The total enrollment goal for the study is a minimum of 313 cases, all of which will receive the Insignia™ Hip Stem.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hip Osteoarthritis
  • Avascular Necrosis
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis
  • Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Trochanteric Fractures
  • Surgery
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, study specific Form (ICF).
  • The subject is skeletally mature
  • The subject has a diagnosis as listed in the instructions for use (IFU), which include non inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis, correction of functional deformity, treatment of nonunion, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures.
  • The subject is a candidate for a primary or revision cementless THA.
  • The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected hip joint at the time of study device implantation.
  • The subject has any mental or neuromuscular disorder which would create an unacceptable risk of prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care.
  • The subject has bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis.
  • The subject is immunologically suppressed or receiving in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. > 30 days).
  • The subject has a known sensitivity to device materials.
  • The subject is involved in any ongoing legal matter, investigation, or dispute pertaining to the operative site.
  • The subject is a prisoner.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
313 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

    The Insignia™ Hip Stem is a collared stem that features a plasma-sprayed Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating over plasma-sprayed titanium in the proximal region and a plasma-sprayed HA coating over grit blast in the distal region and collar underside. Insignia™ Hip Stems are intended for 'cement less' use only and are intended for total arthroplasty procedures.

    Device: Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

Interventions

  • DeviceInsignia uncemented Hip Stem

    Device: Replacement of arthritic hip with Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival Rate

    Evaluation of the survival rate for Insignia Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture.

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. Harris Hip Score (HHS)

    The Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor

    Time frame: 10 Years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Harris Hip Score (HHS)

    The Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor

    Time frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,5 and 7 years

  2. EQ-5D - Descriptive System

    The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility self care, usual activities, pain/comfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels indicating no problems, some problems or extreme problems. The index values on a scale between -1 (low) and 1 (high) are showing the average health status according to the 5 dimensions: A low score shows worse health and a high score shows better health.

    Time frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years

  3. EQ-5D - Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values. With the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) the respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

    Time frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years

  4. Survival Rate

    Evaluation of the survival rate for Insignia™ Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture Success rate at two (2) years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 98 % with a non-inferiority margin of 3.5%. Success rate at 10 years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 95% with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

11 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2034, 145 months after the start.

Of 226 interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Hip, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 145 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2021
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
StartActual
Feb 7, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2, 2034
CompletionEst.
Apr 2, 2034
Last update
May 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05144191
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Start date
Feb 7, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 2, 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
May 18, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion