ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05120843Updated Jan 27, 2026Results posted

Testing Feasibility of Care Coordination and Motivational Interviewing for Women With a Recent Preterm Birth

An interventional study of Care coordination and motivational interviewing in Preterm Birth, Health Care Utilization and Tobacco Use, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 14 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-27.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
This study was terminated once we had collected sufficient information to proceed with the subsequent pilot trial.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study continues an adaptation of care coordination to address the needs of women after preterm birth. This is a small single arm open trial designed to test intervention implementation and refine the intervention before ongoing feasibility testing.

Read the detailed description

Interventionists will be trained in care coordination strategies and Motivational Interviewing (MI) techniques. Following training, investigators will enroll eligible women from a postpartum unit at a single hospital, or within two weeks of birth. Investigators will assess feasibility, adoption, reach, and fidelity of the intervention and of study data collections strategies. The intervention protocol will be revised to reflect these assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Birth
  • Health Care Utilization
  • Tobacco Use
  • Contraceptive Usage
  • Depression
  • Weight, Birth

Keywords

  • Preconception care
  • Interconception care
  • Postpartum care
  • Preventive health care
  • Care coordination
  • Motivational Interviewing
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 489 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female
  2. Less than 45 years old
  3. History of preterm birth (\< 34 weeks gestational age or 34 - 36 weeks with identifiable risk factors for recurrent preterm birth which may include low preventive care utilization, tobacco use, obesity, depression or anxiety, or history of unmet needs)
  4. Intention to seek pediatric care at one of two pediatric primary care sites
  5. Medicaid insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of sterilization procedure.
  2. Plan to move away from the area or transfer pediatric primary care within six months of enrollment.
  3. Limited English proficiency
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Intervention Arm

    This intervention will combine care coordination and motivational interviewing strategies.

    Behavioral: Care coordination and motivational interviewing

Interventions

  • BehavioralCare coordination and motivational interviewing

    Interventionist will engage participants in care planning, health education, health care navigation, screening for unmet health needs or social needs, and motivational interviewing. The final intervention is expected to be six months in duration. However during this single-arm open testing phase, some participants may receive only key components of the intervention in order to assess feasibility, reach, adoption, and fidelity of those components.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Screening Rate (Feasibility)

    The study team will compare the number of potentially eligible participants to those who are screened for eligibility. The number screened will be defined as the number of people whose are reviewed to approach for enrollment. The number of potentially eligible participants will be considered the number of women with preterm births with Medicaid insurance.

    Time frame: Screening phase (Up to 1 week prior to enrollment)

  2. Enrollment Rate (Feasibility)

    The study team will track the proportion of eligible women approached for enrollment who enroll in the study.

    Time frame: Screening phase (Up to one week prior to enrollment)

  3. Reasons for Non-participation (Acceptability)

    For women who decline enrollment we will ask them, if they are willing, to provide reasons for non-participation and potential study modifications that might have encouraged them to participate. Responses will be tabulated and reviewed for potential themes.

    Time frame: Screening phase (Up to 1 week prior to enrollment)

  4. Retention Rate (Feasibility)

    The study team will track the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the intervention and the study assessments.

    Time frame: Enrollment through six months

  5. Number of Completed Assessments (Feasibility)

    The study team will track the proportion of the baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments that are completed.

    Time frame: Enrollment through six months

  6. Care Coordination Fidelity (Feasibility)

    We will assess the proportion of intervention components completed, including interventionist completion of screening tools, as well as other tasks outlined in the care plan, including focused education, navigation, and addressing barriers to care, screening.

    Time frame: Enrollment through six months

  7. Motivational Interviewing (MI) Fidelity (Feasibility)

    OnePass is a validated tool used to evaluate MI practice and assess fidelity based on review of a single session, using 23 items to assess MI components.61 This tool yields a global score while also identifying specific areas for additional practice and training. Scores range from 1 - 7 with 5 considered a minimum for competence. Interventionists will complete at least one OnePass within a month of starting MI sessions with participants.

    Time frame: Enrollment through six months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Autonomy Support

    Autonomy support will be measured with the short form of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (6 items, range 6 - 42, Cronbach alpha 0.82). Scores on the short form 6-item version are calculated by averaging the individual item scores. Higher average scores represent a higher level of perceived autonomy support.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  2. Change in Autonomous Motivation

    Autonomous motivation will be measured using the Autonomous Motivation and External Regulation scales of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (10 items, range 7 - 70, Cronbach alpha 0.90) with a higher score indicating higher emotion regulation strategy.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Count of Preventive Care Visits

    This will include postpartum visits, visits for contraceptive management, routine preventive care visits, and visits to follow-up on complications of pregnancy (secondary prevention). Visits will be abstracted from the health record and from interventionist records.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Proportion of Recommended Care Completed

    This Outcome Measure reports the average percentage of the recommended care plan completed among participants. Recommended care will be abstracted from a care plan completed within the first two weeks after enrollment. Completed care will be abstracted from the health record and from interventionist records.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 27, 2026

Participant flow

Screening and Enrollment Phase
Participant flow — Screening and Enrollment Phase
MilestoneIntervention Arm
Started49
Potentially eligible on chart review28
Approached28
Confirmed eligible22
Consented and enrolled13
Completed13
Not completed36
Withdrew: Not eligible on chart review21
Withdrew: Not eligible on in-person screening6
Withdrew: Too much going on during hospital stay3
Withdrew: Perceived services not needed2
Withdrew: Recently moved to the area1
Withdrew: No reason given3
Intervention Phase
Participant flow — Intervention Phase
MilestoneIntervention Arm
Started13
Completed10
Not completed3
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3

Outcome measures

PrimaryScreening Rate (Feasibility)

The study team will compare the number of potentially eligible participants to those who are screened for eligibility. The number screened will be defined as the number of people whose are reviewed to approach for enrollment. The number of potentially eligible participants will be considered the number of women with preterm births with Medicaid insurance.

Time frame:
Screening phase (Up to 1 week prior to enrollment)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Screening Rate (Feasibility)
ParticipantsIntervention Arm
Screening Rate (Feasibility)49
PrimaryEnrollment Rate (Feasibility)

The study team will track the proportion of eligible women approached for enrollment who enroll in the study.

Time frame:
Screening phase (Up to one week prior to enrollment)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Enrollment Rate (Feasibility)
ParticipantsIntervention Arm
Enrollment Rate (Feasibility)13
PrimaryReasons for Non-participation (Acceptability)

For women who decline enrollment we will ask them, if they are willing, to provide reasons for non-participation and potential study modifications that might have encouraged them to participate. Responses will be tabulated and reviewed for potential themes.

Time frame:
Screening phase (Up to 1 week prior to enrollment)
Reported as:
Number · people
Reasons for Non-participation (Acceptability)
peopleIntervention ArmPeople Who Declined Participation
Too much going on during hospital stay—3
Perceived services not needed—2
Recently moved to the area—1
No reason given—3
PrimaryRetention Rate (Feasibility)

The study team will track the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the intervention and the study assessments.

Time frame:
Enrollment through six months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Retention Rate (Feasibility)
ParticipantsIntervention Arm
Retention Rate (Feasibility)9
PrimaryNumber of Completed Assessments (Feasibility)

The study team will track the proportion of the baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments that are completed.

Time frame:
Enrollment through six months
Reported as:
Number · Completed assessments
Number of Completed Assessments (Feasibility)
Completed assessmentsIntervention Arm
Number of Completed Assessments (Feasibility)31
PrimaryCare Coordination Fidelity (Feasibility)

We will assess the proportion of intervention components completed, including interventionist completion of screening tools, as well as other tasks outlined in the care plan, including focused education, navigation, and addressing barriers to care, screening.

Time frame:
Enrollment through six months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryMotivational Interviewing (MI) Fidelity (Feasibility)

OnePass is a validated tool used to evaluate MI practice and assess fidelity based on review of a single session, using 23 items to assess MI components.61 This tool yields a global score while also identifying specific areas for additional practice and training. Scores range from 1 - 7 with 5 considered a minimum for competence. Interventionists will complete at least one OnePass within a month of starting MI sessions with participants.

Time frame:
Enrollment through six months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Autonomy Support

Autonomy support will be measured with the short form of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (6 items, range 6 - 42, Cronbach alpha 0.82). Scores on the short form 6-item version are calculated by averaging the individual item scores. Higher average scores represent a higher level of perceived autonomy support.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Autonomy Support
units on a scaleIntervention Arm
Change in Autonomy Support-2.5 ± 11.1
SecondaryChange in Autonomous Motivation

Autonomous motivation will be measured using the Autonomous Motivation and External Regulation scales of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (10 items, range 7 - 70, Cronbach alpha 0.90) with a higher score indicating higher emotion regulation strategy.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Autonomous Motivation
units on a scaleIntervention Arm
Change in Autonomous Motivation-1.1 ± 9.9
SecondaryCount of Preventive Care Visits

This will include postpartum visits, visits for contraceptive management, routine preventive care visits, and visits to follow-up on complications of pregnancy (secondary prevention). Visits will be abstracted from the health record and from interventionist records.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · visits
Count of Preventive Care Visits
visitsIntervention Arm
Count of Preventive Care Visits2.2 ± 1.3
SecondaryProportion of Recommended Care Completed

This Outcome Measure reports the average percentage of the recommended care plan completed among participants. Recommended care will be abstracted from a care plan completed within the first two weeks after enrollment. Completed care will be abstracted from the health record and from interventionist records.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Proportion of Recommended Care Completed
percentageIntervention Arm
Proportion of Recommended Care Completed73 ± 35

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Arm0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intervention Arm
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years13
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention Arm
Mean29.4 ± 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention Arm
Female13
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention Arm
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino13
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention Arm
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American13
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Intervention Arm
United States13
Gestational age at delivery
Gestational age at delivery(weeks)Intervention Arm
Mean33.2 ± 3.0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be used to refine the protocol for further testing. There are no plans to share individual participant data.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05120843
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2021
Start date
Feb 3, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2023
Completion
Sep 23, 2023
Results posted
Jan 27, 2026
Last update
Jan 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion