An interventional study of Online educational materials and Facilitated online webinars in Palliative Care, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-03.
Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The purpose of this cluster randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of a quality improvement intervention called CAPACITI intended to increase competency among primary care teams to deliver early palliative care. CAPACITI is palliative care training and coaching program for primary care teams, comprised of three, two-month (4 session) modules, each addressing a critical component of implementing a palliative care approach into primary care practice.
Improving access to home-based palliative care can improve patient and system outcomes; however, there is a lack of programs to build capacity among primary care teams to deliver this care. To address this gap, the investigators are offering a quality improvement intervention called CAPACITI. CAPACITI is palliative care training and coaching program for primary care teams, comprised of three, two-month (4 session) modules. Each module addresses a critical component of implementing a PC approach into primary care practice: (1) Identify and Assess; (2) Enhance Communication Skills; (3) Enhance Skills for Ongoing Care (including involvement of family and specialists). Over bi-monthly (one hour) sessions, each CAPACITI module uniquely integrates 3 components: clinical education in the form of expert advice and tips; evidence-based tools; and high-facilitation and expert coaching for adaptation to local context. The study will offer the CAPACITI modules to primary care teams across Canada. Teams that register for a module will be randomized to one of two arms: 1) facilitated learning where the module materials are covered in live webinars, and 2) non-facilitated learning where teams have access to all module materials to use a self-directed approach. The online materials for both study arms will be provided on a learning management system. The investigators will examine the difference between the facilitated and nonfacilitated approaches in teams' abilities to provide a palliative care approach in relation to the content of the module. Ultimately this research program will strengthen the primary care system and increase access to home-based palliative care for patients across Canada.
583 studies on the registry are indexed under Death; 109 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 566 is above the median of 131 across 267 interventional studies indexed under Death.
Browse Death studies →McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 738 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Access to all the CAPACITI module materials, provided on a learning management system. The intervention group will also receive the CAPACITI program with module facilitation, namely high-facilitation and expert coaching in the coverage of module materials in four live webinars (bimonthly for the 2 month duration of the module = 4 webinars).
Other: Online educational materials · Behavioral: Facilitated online webinars
Access to all the CAPACITI module materials, provided on a learning management system. The control group will not receive module facilitation (i.e., will entail self-directed learning).
Other: Online educational materials
The CAPACITI program is comprised of three independent modules, taken separately (each constituting an intervention): (1) Identify and Assess; (2) Enhance Communication Skills; (3) Enhance Skills for Ongoing Care (including involvement of family and specialists). Each module addresses a critical component of implementing a palliative care approach into primary care practice. The CAPACITI program emphasizes practice supports in each module, integrating two components: 1) clinical education in the form of expert advice and tips, and 2) evidence-based tools with action steps.
Intervention participants will be invited to participate in facilitated online discussions. These discussions review the online materials and share strategies for problem-solving.
Proportion of case load identified as requiring a palliative care approach
Measured based on self-reported i) Number of patients in caseload and number (calculated %) reported as identified as requiring a palliative care approach, ii) Typical timing of when to initiate a palliative care approach for cancer and non-cancer patients respectively.
Time frame: Up to one month post module
End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS)
The EPCS is a 28-item scale developed to assess palliative care-specific educational needs within an interprofessional team related to three main subdomains: Effective Care Delivery (ECD 8-items); Patient and Family-Centered Communication (PFCC 12-items); and Cultural and Ethical Values (CEV 8-items) (Lazenby, 2012). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (lowest level of skill) to 5 (greatest level of skill). Items represent care-provider comfort with a variety of situations related to palliative and EOL care. The EPCS covers all eight domains of the national palliative care guidelines and core lessons of physician-specific and nurse-specific end of life education curricula in the USA. The EPCS exhibits strong internal consistency (alpha = 0.96). For the purposes of this study we will exclude the CEV sub-domain items from the EPCS.
Time frame: Up to one month post module
Assignment Completion & Change Survey
This survey is a two-part, study created questionnaire based on the CAPACITI module activities. Part A is unique to each module, asking participants to indicate the extent to which they were able to complete each of the session assignments for the module. Response options are: Have not started (1), Started but not completed (2), Completed (3). Part B contains four items assessing changes in thinking, behaviour, processes, and patient/family experience, respectively. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, rating the strength of agreement with each element of change, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Time frame: Up to one month post module
CAPACITI Competencies Survey
The CAPACITI Competencies Survey is a study created questionnaire based on the CanMEDS framework for improving patient care by enhancing physician training and the topics covered in the CAPACITI program. CanMEDS, developed by the Royal College of Physicians, delineates critical competencies to effectively meeting the health care needs of patients, including communication, expertise, collaboration, advocacy, and commitment (cite https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/canmeds-framework-e). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (lowest level of confidence) to 7 (greatest level of confidence). The Competencies Survey was developed and tested in the CAPACITI pilot study. The CAPACITI Competencies Survey exhibits strong internal consistency (alpha = 0.96).
Time frame: Up to one month post module
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS II)
The AITCS is an instrument designed to measure interprofessional collaboration among team members. The AITCS consists of 23 items considered characteristic of interprofessional collaboration (how team works and acts). Scale items represent three elements considered to be key to collaborative practice. These subscales are: Partnership (8 items), Cooperation (8 items), and Coordination (7 items). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale indicating the extent to which the team exhibits each, ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Internal consistency estimates for reliability of each subscale range from 0.80 to 0.97, with an overall reliability of 0.98.
Time frame: Up to one month post module
Module Session Evaluation
Participants will be asked to complete an evaluation poll at the end of each module session, consisting of 4 items: 3 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all/ Poor/ Not successful) to 5 (Very likely/ Excellent / Extremely successful) and 1 dichotomous item assessing perceived bias (Yes/No).
Time frame: Up to one month post module
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — No plan to share IPD
Ran from Nov 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 24 months.
Of 133 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Death, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 24 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 138 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.