An interventional study of ROCKS and Usual Care in Advanced Cancer and End of Life, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.
Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aims of this study are to (1) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ROCKS intervention among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers through a randomized controlled trial in a cancer center setting; (2) evaluate the preliminary efficacy of ROCKS, as compared to usual care, on changes in completion of advance directives; and (3) explore the dyadic effects of resilience on self-efficacy, optimism, dyadic communication and coping, anxiety, and depression using an actor-partner interdependence model.
Patients with advanced cancer have not fully benefited from advance care planning due to the high levels of anxiety and depression experienced and other barriers that affect their appraisals and coping. Despite the protective effects of resilience, there have been few clinical trials improving the resilience skills of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers to help initiate advance care planning discussions and sustain engagement. This research evaluates the impact of a web-based resilience-building intervention called ROCKS on enhancing the completion of advance directives, as well as improving resilience, coping, anxiety, and depression among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.
456 studies on the registry are indexed under Death; 86 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 152 is close to the median of 163 across 210 interventional studies indexed under Death.
Browse Death studies →University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.
Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (59%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants assigned to this arm will receive a web-based resilience-building intervention.
Behavioral: ROCKS
Participants assigned to this arm will receive an advance directive called Five Wishes.
Behavioral: Usual Care
The intervention will be provided to participants to strengthen optimism, communication skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy to support patients and family caregivers in engaging in advance care planning discussions.
An advance directive called Five Wishes will be provided to participants to increase their knowledge about advance care planning.
Completion of advance directives
Completion of Five Wishes
Time frame: Week 8
Resilience
Assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (Range: 0-100; higher scores indicate a greater level of resilience)
Time frame: Week 8
Optimism
Assessed using the Revised Compound Psychological Capital Scale (Range: 3-18; higher scores indicate a greater level of optimism)
Time frame: Week 8
Dyadic communication and coping
Assessed using the Dyadic Coping Inventory (Range: 35-175; higher scores indicate greater perceived communication and dyadic coping)
Time frame: Week 8
Knowledge
Assessed using the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (Range: 2-10; Higher scores indicate a greater knowledge of advance care planning)
Time frame: Week 8
Self-efficacy
Assessed using the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (Range: 12-50; Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in advance care planning)
Time frame: Week 8
Anxiety
Assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (Range: 0-21; Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety)
Time frame: Week 8
Depression
Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Range: 0-27; Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression)
Time frame: Week 8
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 23 months after the start.
Of 105 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Death, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 23 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 109 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.
Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: May 2026 → Jun 2026, on Oct 8, 2026.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Illinois at Chicago →