CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07428278ROCKSUpdated Jun 9, 2026

Resilience-Building for Advance Care Planning

An interventional study of ROCKS and Usual Care in Advanced Cancer and End of Life, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
152
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aims of this study are to (1) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ROCKS intervention among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers through a randomized controlled trial in a cancer center setting; (2) evaluate the preliminary efficacy of ROCKS, as compared to usual care, on changes in completion of advance directives; and (3) explore the dyadic effects of resilience on self-efficacy, optimism, dyadic communication and coping, anxiety, and depression using an actor-partner interdependence model.

Read the detailed description

Patients with advanced cancer have not fully benefited from advance care planning due to the high levels of anxiety and depression experienced and other barriers that affect their appraisals and coping. Despite the protective effects of resilience, there have been few clinical trials improving the resilience skills of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers to help initiate advance care planning discussions and sustain engagement. This research evaluates the impact of a web-based resilience-building intervention called ROCKS on enhancing the completion of advance directives, as well as improving resilience, coping, anxiety, and depression among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Cancer
  • End of Life

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Resilience
  • Advance Care Planning
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible patients will (1) be ≥ 18 years of age; (2) be diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 cancer; and (3) have a family caregiver who is willing to participate.
  • Eligible family caregivers will be ≥ 18 years of age. All participants must be able to read, write, and speak English with minimal assistance from others and have access to the internet on a smartphone, laptop, or computer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participants will be ineligible if they have (1) a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score \< 8; or (2) have completed any form of advance directive.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
152 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ROCKS

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive a web-based resilience-building intervention.

    Behavioral: ROCKS

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive an advance directive called Five Wishes.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralROCKS

    The intervention will be provided to participants to strengthen optimism, communication skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy to support patients and family caregivers in engaging in advance care planning discussions.

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    An advance directive called Five Wishes will be provided to participants to increase their knowledge about advance care planning.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion of advance directives

    Completion of Five Wishes

    Time frame: Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Resilience

    Assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (Range: 0-100; higher scores indicate a greater level of resilience)

    Time frame: Week 8

  2. Optimism

    Assessed using the Revised Compound PsyCap Scale (Range: 3-18; higher scores indicate a greater level of optimism)

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Dyadic communication and coping

    Assessed using the Dyadic Coping Inventory (Range: 35-175; higher scores indicate greater perceived communication and dyadic coping)

    Time frame: Week 8

  4. Knowledge

    Assessed using the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (Range: 2-10; Higher scores indicate a greater knowledge of advance care planning)

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Self-efficacy

    Assessed using the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (Range: 12-50; Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in advance care planning)

    Time frame: Week 8

  6. Anxiety

    Assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (Range: 0-21; Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety)

    Time frame: Week 8

  7. Depression

    Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Range: 0-27; Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression)

    Time frame: Week 8

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Illinois Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07428278
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
Start date
May 28, 2026
Primary completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Study contacts

Li-Ting Longcoy
Contact
liting@uic.edu
312-996-3024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion