ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05107310SPINAVUpdated Aug 27, 2026

The Spinal Navigation Trial - Surgical Navigation or Free Hand Technique in Spine Surgery

An interventional study of Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique and Pedicle screws insertion using ARSN in Scoliosis and Kyphosis, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The spinal navigation trial (SPINAV) is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the use of computer-assisted navigation in surgery for spinal deformity

Read the detailed description

Spinal deformity is a common reason for spinal surgery at youth. In addition, the incidence of surgery for spinal deformity in older adults is increasing. Spinal deformity surgery is by far the most complex spine surgery. One complexity lies in the correct placement of implants in the severely deformed spine. Today, the most common surgical procedures for spinal deformity involve placement of screws in the vertebral pedicle in the instrumented part of the spine. This gives good bone purchase, which is important for deformity correction.

The pedicle is narrow and misplaced pedicle screws can result in vascular, pulmonary or neural injuries, or inadequate bone purchase. Compared to the conventional free-hand surgical technique, which relies on the knowledge of anatomy, computer-assisted navigation using intraoperative 3D imaging has been shown to improve screw placement accuracy and reduce complications due to screw misplacements. As a consequence, navigation may also reduce the frequency of postoperative revision surgery compared to free hand. However, navigation still takes time, and is associated with higher intraoperative radiation than the free hand technique.

As of yet, the majority of data in this area are based on retrospectively collected series, and some prospectively collected series, while randomized controlled trials on spinal deformity are lacking.

In this randomized controlled trial the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN), infra-red surgical navigation (IRSN) and conventional free-hand technique will be investigated.

Patients of age 12 years and older with spinal deformities are randomized into one of the three surgical techniques mentioned above.

The primary outcome variable is pedicle screw placement accuracy at 1st attempt assessed using the Gertzbein scale.

Data from the navigated groups (ASRN and IRSN) will be analyzed together, and compared with the free hand groups analyzed together. The ASRN and ISRN groups will also be compared with their respective free hand groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scoliosis
  • Kyphosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Scoliosis

660 studies on the registry are indexed under Scoliosis; 186 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 45 across 386 interventional studies indexed under Scoliosis.

Browse Scoliosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written by patient or legal guardian
  • Age 12 years and older
  • Spinal deformity surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give
  • Surgery without pedicle screws
  • Previous surgery with pedicle screws in the planned surgical area
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Navigation group 1 ARSN

    Augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN). Pedicle screw placement using the Philips ClarifEye system combined with Philips Allura for imaging.

    Procedure: Pedicle screws insertion using ARSN

  • Active comparator
    Control group 1 FH

    Free hand (FH) surgical technique. Pedicle screw placement using conventional free hand technique.

    Procedure: Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique

  • Experimental
    Navigation group 2 IRSN

    Infrared surgical navigation (IRSN). Pedicle screw placement using Brainlab Curve 1.2 combined with Medtronic o-arm for imaging.

    Procedure: Pedicle screws insertion using IRSN

  • Active comparator
    Control group 2 FH

    Free hand (FH) surgical technique. Pedicle screw placement using conventional free hand technique.

    Procedure: Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique

Interventions

  • ProcedurePedicle screws insertion by free hand technique

    Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using free hand technique with the help of intraoperative fluoroscopy if needed.

  • ProcedurePedicle screws insertion using ARSN

    Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) with the ClarifEye navigation system and the Philips Allura 2D/3D imaging system.

  • ProcedurePedicle screws insertion using IRSN

    Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using infra-red surgical navigation (IRSN) with the Brainlab Curve 1.2 navigation system combined with the Medtronic O-arm 2D/3D imaging system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accurately placed pedicle screws

    The primary endpoint is the percentage of accurately placed pedicle screws assessed using the Gertzbein scale and based on intraoperative verification scan cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

    Time frame: Intraoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pedicle screw intraoperative revision rates-clinical assessment

    Number of screws intraoperatively revised based on clinical assessment

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  2. Pedicle screw intraoperative revision rates- neurophysiology

    Number of screws intraoperatively revised based on neurophysiology

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  3. Pedicle screw intraoperative revision rates- intraoperative verification

    Number of screws intraoperatively revised based on intraoperative verification CBCT scan

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  4. Accuracy for ARSN - path deviation in mm

    Deviation from planned navigated path in mm at bone entry and screw tip measured on the postoperative computed tomography (CT)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  5. Accuracy for IRSN- path deviation in mm

    Deviation from navigated path in mm at bone entry and screw tip measured on the postoperative computed tomography (CT)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  6. Accuracy for ARSN - angular deviation

    Angular deviation (degrees) of the placed screw compared to the planned navigated path measured on the postoperative computed tomography (CT)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  7. Accuracy for IRSN - angular deviation

    Angular deviation of the placed screw compared to the navigated path measured on the postoperative computed tomography (CT)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  8. Accuracy at 1st attempt

    Accuracy at 1st attempt = (Screws placed at first attempt according to intraoperative protocols and graded 0 or 1) / (total number of placed screws). Assessed on intraoperative CBCT

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  9. Final accuracy of placed pedicle screws

    Final accuracy of placed pedicle screws is calculated as: number of accurately placed screws (Gertzbein grade 0+1) according to postoperative CT / total number of placed screws.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  10. Pedicle screw placement density

    The study aims for 100% pedicle screw density. Hooks may be placed as rescue or if screw placement fails.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  11. Pedicle screw placement in relation to morphometric measurements

    Pedicle diameters are measured on preoperative and intraoperative CT. Pedicle screw placement measured on intraoperative and postoperative CT.

    Time frame: Preoperative and intraoperative

  12. Deformity correction change

    Cobb angle change from preoperative to first erect postoperative radiograph

    Time frame: 3-6 months post-op

  13. Patient radiation dose exposure

    Patient radiation exposure (ED in mSv) for the whole procedure, Patient radiation exposure (ED in mSv) for fluoroscopy Patient radiation exposure (ED in mSv) for each CBCT

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  14. Staff radiation dose exposure

    Average staff radiation exposure (in mSv) for the whole procedure

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  15. Intraoperative characteristics- procedure time

    Total procedure time as well as normalized to number of spinal levels from the upper to the lower instrumented vertebra.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  16. Intraoperative characteristics- planning time

    Intraoperative planning time (from start of planning in navigation software until last screw planned) (only when treated with ARSN or IRSN)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  17. Intraoperative characteristics- instrumentation time

    Instrumentation time (total time for navigated/FH screw placement from first to last screw placement)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  18. Intraoperative characteristics- instrumentation time/level

    Instrumentation time normalized to number of levels

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  19. Intraoperative characteristics- time for verification imaging

    Time for intraoperative verification imaging (CBCT and/or Fluoroscopy)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  20. Intraoperative characteristics- screw placement time

    Screw placement time (per screw, from start with awl to screw placed)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  21. Intraoperative characteristics- blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  22. Inpatient stay

    Length of hospital stay in days

    Time frame: Measured from day of surgery until day of discharge. Usual length of stay is less than one week, and maximum two weeks.

  23. Patient reported outcome measures- Scoliosis Research Society 22 revised (SRS-22r)

    The scoliosis specific questionnaire SRS-22r ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best)

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  24. Patient reported outcome measures- the 24 item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24)

    The scoliosis specific questionnaire EOSQ-24 ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  25. Patient reported outcome measures- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The back disabiliy questionnaire (ODI) ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  26. Patient reported outcome measures- EQ-5D 3 level version (EQ-5D-3L)

    The generic quality of life EQ-5D-3L index ranging from -0.59 (worst) to 1.00 (best)

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  27. Complications

    Number of patients that have had complications

    Time frame: At 30 days, at 90 days

  28. Revision surgery

    Number of patients that have undergone revision surgeries

    Time frame: At 30 days, at 90 days, at 1 year

  29. Cost per patient

    Cost per patient

    Time frame: At 30 days, at 90 days, at 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • El-Hajj VG, Charalampidis A, Fell D, Edstrom E, Elmi-Terander A, Gerdhem P. Study protocol: the SPInal NAVigation (SPINAV) trial - comparison of augmented reality surgical navigation, conventional image-guided navigation, and free-hand technique for pedicle screw placement in spinal deformity surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 2;26(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08817-3. PubMed 40457280 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Manuscripts will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Quality-controlled raw data as well as processed data used in publications will be made available at the time of publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: The detailed protocol, including the statistical analysis plan will be submitted for publication after study start. No end date.

Access criteria: Either as an appendix to publications, or at a repository at the Sponsor of the trial.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05107310
Responsible party
Paul Gerdhem (Professor, Uppsala University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2021
Start date
Jan 18, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Gerdhem, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion