CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05066854INVICTUS PEDUpdated Nov 26, 2025

INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in Choosing a Narrow-spectrum Empirical anTibiotic Treatment vs Usual Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Urinary Tract infectionS in the PEDiatric Emergency Department

An interventional study of integron research and usual practice in Urinary Tract Infections in Children, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Terminated at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Why this study was terminated
Not enough patients
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Months to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

INVICTUS PED primary objective is to show the non-inferiority of an empirical antibiotic therapeutic management guided by the early detection of integrons in the urine, compared to a usual empirical antibiotic treatment, for the recovery of children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with a non-severe urinary tract infection (UTI) with fever

Read the detailed description

Urinary tract infections with fever are common in children and require primary health care management. Because of the risk of immediate evolution to a systemic infection with long-term renal scars, empirical antibiotic treatment is recommended. The French Group for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (GPIP) recommends the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) targeting enterobacteria, which are mainly involved in UTI and increasingly resistant to antibiotics through the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. However, use of 3GC is a well-known risk factor for resistant germs selection and one of the main guideline to fight antibiotic resistance, which is an important public health issue, is to reduce their use. Integrons are genetic elements involved in the spread of antibiotic resistance in enterobacteria. Preliminary studies showed that integron search using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) directly on urine samples had a great NPV (>98%) for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The hypothesis is that, in children presenting to the pediatric ED with non-severe UTI with fever, absence of integron in their urine could allow prescribing an empirical antibiotic treatment with SXT without decreasing the chance of recovery, thus decreasing the use of 3GC.

Two strategies is compare: i) In the control group: empirical antibiotic treatment according to the usual practice of each center, in line with the GPIP guidelines, ii) in the experimental group: empirical antibiotic treatment chosen depending on the results of the integron search with PCR. When PCR is positive, treatment according to usual practice; when PCR is negative, treatment with SXT.

Two follow-up visits, by phone, will be planned: at H48 (+ 24h), when the empirical antibiotic treatment is assessed based on the urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results, and on D30 (+/- 2 days) at the end of the follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infections in Children

Keywords

  • empirical antibiotic treatment
  • biomarker
  • urinary tract infection
  • antibiotic resistance
  • pediatric emergency department
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

753 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 130 across 523 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Tract Infections.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Children above 3 months old and under 18 years old
  • Consultation in a participating pediatric emergency department
  • Suspicion of UTI with fever (Fever ≥ 38°C and urine dipstick test positive for leukocytes and/or nitrites)
  • First episode of UTI with fever
  • Written informed consent of the holders of parental authority
  • Affiliated to Social Security

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria of severity:

    • Severe infection with severe sepsis or septic shock
    • Dehydration ≥ 10%
    • Fever ≥ 38°C > 4 days (96h)
    • Indication of surgical or interventional drainage
  • Complication risk factors:

    • Any anatomic or functional defect of the urinary tract (other than low-grade VUR and calyceal dilation \< 10 mm)
    • Repetition of UTI with fever ≤ than 6 months since the previous episode
    • Repetition of UTI with fever and anatomic or functional defect of the urinary tract
    • Pregnancy
    • Severely immunocompromised patient
    • Severe chronic renal failure defined as a clearance \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
    • Severe liver failure
  • 3GC allergy
  • Contra-indication to SXT:

    • G6PD deficiency
    • Treatment with methotrexate
    • Allergy to sulfonamide
  • Antibiotic treatment within 48h before admission
  • Empirical antibiotic treatment not recommended
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Integron research

    Empirical antibiotic treatment chosen based on the results of the integron search: * when PCR is negative, patients will receive SXT (30 mg/kg/j of sulfamethoxazole and 6 mg/kg/j of trimethoprim) * when PCR is positive or uninterpretable for integrons, patients will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines.

    Procedure: integron research

  • Other
    Usual practice

    Empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIG guidelines.

    Procedure: usual practice

Interventions

  • Procedureintegron research

    Patients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED. Urine samples will be sent to the laboratory for culture and integron PCR according to routine practice. Results of the integron search will be given to the investigator. Patients in the experimental group with a positive or uninterpretable PCR will also receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines. Patients in the experimental group with a negative PCR will receive a treatment with SXT at the recommended dose.

  • Procedureusual practice

    Patients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED. Patients in the control group will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery

    Recovery defined as, apyrexia obtained within less than 72h and no persistence or repetition of UTI with fever and no change of empirical antibiotic therapy required because of resistance and no treatment interruption for adverse effects

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. patients treated

    Number of patients treated with 3GC in both groups, during the participation of each patient

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. Duration treatment

    Duration of treatment with 3GC in both groups for patient treated, during the participation of each patient

    Time frame: Day 30

  3. Antibiotic treatment changes

    In both groups, description of antibiotic treatment changes based on the AST results, according to 4 criteria: * Change because of resistance * Narrowing of the antibiotic spectrum * Interruption because the diagnosis of UTI was ruled out * Antibiotics used

    Time frame: Hour 48

  4. Adaptation of antibiotherapy with the AST result

    Proportion of patients in both groups for whom empirical antibiotic treatment was adapted to the AST results and did not require any change (because of resistance, or to narrow the antibiotic spectrum)

    Time frame: Hour 48

  5. Resistance of enterobacteria

    In the study population, percentage of resistance of enterobacteria to the different antibiotic classes

    Time frame: Hour 48

  6. Predictive values of the integrons

    Negative and positive predictive values of the integrons depending on the main antibiotic classes used in the experimental group.

    Time frame: Hour 48

  7. Apyrexia

    Time to apyrexia from the start of the antibiotic therapy compared between both groups.

    Time frame: Hour 48

  8. Early repetition of urinary tract infection

    Proportion of early repetition of urinary tract infection with fever in both groups.

    Time frame: Day 30

  9. Treatment interruption for adverse effects

    Proportion of treatment interruption for adverse effects in both groups.

    Time frame: Day 30

  10. Time spent in the pediatric emergency department

    Time spent in the pediatric emergency department in both groups

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Bordeaux university Hospital
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Limoges university Hospital
    Limoges, 87042, France
  • Montpellier university Hospital
    Montpellier, 34000, France
  • Toulouse university Hospital
    Toulouse, 31000, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05066854
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Limoges
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2021
Start date
Oct 18, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2025
Completion
Nov 17, 2025
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion