ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05063539Updated Jun 12, 2026Results posted

A Study of LY3372689 to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of LY3372689 and LY3372689 in Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Completed at 69 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
327
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and effect of study drug LY3372689 in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease
  • Tauopathy
  • Tau
  • OGA Inhibitor
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 327 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company is the lead sponsor of 2,106 studies on the registry; 152 are open to participants now.

Of its 536 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 357 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gradual and progressive change in memory function reported by participants or informants for ≥ 6 months
  • score of 22 to 30 (inclusive) at screening
  • CDR global score of 0.5 to 1.0 (inclusive), with a memory box score ≥0.5.
  • Meet 18F flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) scan (central analysis) criteria
  • Have a study partner who will provide written to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to MRI or PET scans
  • Have known allergies to LY3372689, related compounds, or any components of the formulations
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
327 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    0.75 Milligram (mg) LY3372689

    Double-blind treatment period: Participants received 0.75 mg LY3372689 administered orally once daily for up to 124 weeks. Post treatment follow up period: Participants who received 0.75 mg LY3372689 during the double-blind treatment period entered a post-treatment follow-up period for 4 weeks after last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety monitoring. Post treatment observational extension period: Participants who received 0.75 mg LY3372689 during the double-blind treatment period had the option to enter post-treatment observational extension period for approximately 9 months on average since last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety, other/exploratory efficacy and biomarker monitoring.

    Drug: LY3372689

  • Experimental
    3 mg LY3372689

    Double-blind treatment period: Participants received 3 mg LY3372689 administered orally once daily for up to 124 weeks. Post treatment follow up period: Participants who received 3 mg LY3372689 during the double-blind treatment period entered a post-treatment follow-up period for 4 weeks after last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety monitoring. Post treatment observational extension period: Participants who received 3 mg LY3372689 during the double-blind treatment period had the option to enter post-treatment observational extension period for approximately 9 months on average since last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety, other/exploratory efficacy and biomarker monitoring.

    Drug: LY3372689

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Double-blind treatment period: Participants received placebo administered orally once daily for up to 124 weeks. Post treatment follow up period: Participants who received placebo during the double-blind treatment period entered a post-treatment follow-up period for 4 weeks after last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety monitoring. Post treatment observational extension period: Participants who received placebo during the double-blind treatment period had the option to enter post-treatment observational extension period for approximately 9 months on average since last blinded treatment dose. No study intervention was administered during this period, and participants were followed for safety, other/exploratory efficacy and biomarker monitoring.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    iADRS is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether LY3372689 slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) adjusted for age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline, pooled investigator. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 100

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in iADRS (Overall Population)

    iADRS is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether LY3372689 slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) adjusted for age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline, pooled investigator. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 100

  2. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score are assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  3. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population)

    CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  4. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviours characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  5. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population)

    The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviours characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  6. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    The ADCS-iADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-iADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  7. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Overall Population)

    The ADCS-iADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-iADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  8. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  9. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Overall Population)

    MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  10. Change From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) from the following composite brain regions: frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes and the Alzheimer's disease (AD) neocortical signature. The AD neocortical signature region of interest refers to a weighted Alzheimer's Disease specific neocortical region derived from Multiblock Barycentric Discriminant Analysis. Cerebellar gray matter was used as a reference region to derive an SUVr. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  11. Change From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Overall Population)

    Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) from the following composite brain regions: frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes and the Alzheimer's disease (AD) neocortical signature. The AD neocortical signature region of interest refers to a weighted Alzheimer's Disease specific neocortical region derived from Multiblock Barycentric Discriminant Analysis. Cerebellar gray matter was used as a reference region to derive an SUVr. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, baseline tau PET category, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  12. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

    MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain atrophy. Volumetric MRI (vMRI) parameters were measured in brain regions: bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole lateral ventricles, and bilateral whole brain. The atrophy was assessed by tensor-based morphometry, which captures volume changes within the deformation map. LS Mean change from baseline was determined by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with fixed effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and adjusted for baseline volume, age at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  13. Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Overall Population)

    MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain atrophy. Volumetric MRI (vMRI) parameters were measured in brain regions: bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole lateral ventricles, and bilateral whole brain. The atrophy was assessed by tensor-based morphometry, which captures volume changes within the deformation map. LS Mean change from baseline was determined by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with fixed effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and adjusted for baseline volume, baseline tau PET category, age at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 76

  14. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Plasma Concentrations of LY3372689

    Blood samples were measured at week 64 to assess the concentration of LY3372689 in the plasma.

    Time frame: Week 64: Post-dose

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2025

Participant flow

Double-Blind Treatment Period
Participant flow — Double-Blind Treatment Period
Milestone0.75 Milligram (mg) LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Started110109108
Received at least 1 dose of study drug (safety population)108110108
Completed867089
Not completed243919
Withdrew: Adverse event121
Withdrew: Death011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Physician decision431
Withdrew: Progressive disease020
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject172614
Withdrew: Withdrawal due to caregiver circumstances110
Withdrew: Participant randomized via interactive web response system before vital signs met exclusion criteria100
Withdrew: Participant no longer wished to continue with investigational product (ip) or follow-up visits001
Withdrew: Discontinued due to common close design010
Withdrew: Participant not co-operative010
Withdrew: Participant moving to different place from where it takes 4 hours to come to site to continue001
Withdrew: Caregiver withdrew consent due to participant moved to long term care home010
Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period
Participant flow — Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period
Milestone0.75 Milligram (mg) LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Started837188
Completed806483
Not completed375
Withdrew: Death111
Withdrew: Subject moved out of state100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject131
Withdrew: Adverse event010
Withdrew: Physician decision011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up001
Withdrew: Progressive disease001
Withdrew: Subject discontinued study010
Post-Treatment Observational Extension
Participant flow — Post-Treatment Observational Extension
Milestone0.75 Milligram (mg) LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Started423842
Completed403240
Not completed262
Withdrew: Death010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject252

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

iADRS is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether LY3372689 slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) adjusted for age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline, pooled investigator. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 100
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
score on a scale0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Posterior mean difference: 1.68 · 95% CI -0.375 to 3.771Posterior mean difference with 95% credible interval is reported.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Posterior mean difference: -3.20 · 95% CI -5.354 to -1.042Posterior mean difference with 95% credible interval is reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in iADRS (Overall Population)

iADRS is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether LY3372689 slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) adjusted for age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline, pooled investigator. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 100
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in iADRS (Overall Population)
score on a scale0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in iADRS (Overall Population)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Posterior mean difference: 1.59 · 95% CI -0.443 to 3.697Posterior mean difference with 95% credible interval is reported.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Posterior mean difference: -5.07 · 95% CI -7.277 to -2.862
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score are assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)0.91 ± 0.232.14 ± 0.241.05 ± 0.22
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.665 · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.763 to 0.488A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.001 · Ls mean difference: 1.09 · 95% CI 0.435 to 1.736A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population)

CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population)1.54 ± 0.252.81 ± 0.271.48 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.878 · Ls mean difference: 0.05 · 95% CI -0.641 to 0.749A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 1.33 · 95% CI 0.615 to 2.050A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviours characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)4.00 ± 0.704.91 ± 0.765.14 ± 0.69
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.252 · Ls mean difference: -1.13 · 95% CI -3.073 to 0.811A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.825 · Ls mean difference: -0.23 · 95% CI -2.252 to 1.797A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population)

The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviours characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population)5.58 ± 0.787.61 ± 0.835.95 ± 0.76
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.733 · Ls mean difference: -0.37 · 95% CI -2.527 to 1.779A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.143 · Ls mean difference: 1.66 · 95% CI -0.565 to 3.877A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

The ADCS-iADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-iADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)-2.65 ± 0.72-5.34 ± 0.77-2.82 ± 0.70
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.860 · Ls mean difference: 0.18 · 95% CI -1.802 to 2.158A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.017 · Ls mean difference: -2.51 · 95% CI -4.567 to -0.456A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Overall Population)

The ADCS-iADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-iADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Overall Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL) (Overall Population)-4.02 ± 0.79-7.26 ± 0.83-3.24 ± 0.77
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.479 · Ls mean difference: -0.78 · 95% CI -2.949 to 1.387A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -4.01 · 95% CI -6.239 to -1.788A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)-1.65 ± 0.38-2.79 ± 0.41-2.25 ± 0.37
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.259 · Ls mean difference: 0.60 · 95% CI -0.445 to 1.642A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.324 · Ls mean difference: -0.54 · 95% CI -1.629 to 0.541A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Overall Population)

MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using natural cubic spline with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) adjusted for fixed effects of NCS basis expansion terms (two terms), NCS basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, visit (in weeks), investigator site (pooled), age at baseline, baseline tau PET category, AChEI/Memantine use at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Overall Population)
score on a scale0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Overall Population)-2.52 ± 0.41-4.00 ± 0.44-2.70 ± 0.40
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.749 · Ls mean difference: 0.18 · 95% CI -0.946 to 1.313A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · NCS2 · p = 0.029 · Ls mean difference: -1.30 · 95% CI -2.462 to -0.134A NCS model with 2 degrees of freedom (NCS2) was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) from the following composite brain regions: frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes and the Alzheimer's disease (AD) neocortical signature. The AD neocortical signature region of interest refers to a weighted Alzheimer's Disease specific neocortical region derived from Multiblock Barycentric Discriminant Analysis. Cerebellar gray matter was used as a reference region to derive an SUVr. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)
Change From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Frontal0.05 ± 0.0080.03 ± 0.0090.04 ± 0.008
Parietal0.05 ± 0.0090.03 ± 0.0100.06 ± 0.009
Lateral occipital0.04 ± 0.0150.05 ± 0.0160.07 ± 0.015
Lateral temporal0.07 ± 0.0110.04 ± 0.0120.07 ± 0.011
AD neocortical signature (measured using MUBADA)0.07 ± 0.0110.05 ± 0.0120.08 ± 0.010
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.346 · Ls mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.412 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.01
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.421 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.080 · Ls mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.00
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.192 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.01
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.279 · Ls mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.02
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.693 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.040 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.838 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.055 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.00
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Overall Population)

Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) from the following composite brain regions: frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes and the Alzheimer's disease (AD) neocortical signature. The AD neocortical signature region of interest refers to a weighted Alzheimer's Disease specific neocortical region derived from Multiblock Barycentric Discriminant Analysis. Cerebellar gray matter was used as a reference region to derive an SUVr. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden. LS Mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, baseline tau PET category, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · SUVR
Change From Baseline to End Time Point In Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan (Overall Population)
SUVR0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Frontal0.07 ± 0.0110.06 ± 0.0110.06 ± 0.011
Parietal0.08 ± 0.0130.08 ± 0.0130.07 ± 0.012
Lateral occipital0.08 ± 0.0180.09 ± 0.0180.09 ± 0.017
Lateral temporal0.08 ± 0.0150.07 ± 0.0150.08 ± 0.014
AD neocortical signature (measured using MUBADA)0.09 ± 0.0140.08 ± 0.0150.09 ± 0.014
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.455 · Ls mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.745 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.676 · Ls mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.794 · Ls mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.643 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.880 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.04
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.844 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.03
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.388 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.02
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.815 · Ls mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.562 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)

MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain atrophy. Volumetric MRI (vMRI) parameters were measured in brain regions: bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole lateral ventricles, and bilateral whole brain. The atrophy was assessed by tensor-based morphometry, which captures volume changes within the deformation map. LS Mean change from baseline was determined by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with fixed effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and adjusted for baseline volume, age at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · cubic centimeter (cm^3)
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
cubic centimeter (cm^3)0.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Bilateral Hippocampus-0.19 ± 0.017-0.16 ± 0.019-0.28 ± 0.016
Bilateral Whole Lateral Ventricles3.52 ± 0.4254.25 ± 0.4585.89 ± 0.405
Bilateral Whole Brain-10.75 ± 1.231-9.56 ± 1.345-18.92 ± 1.186
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 0.09 · 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 0.13 · 95% CI 0.08 to 0.18
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -2.37 · 95% CI -3.53 to -1.21
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.008 · Ls mean difference: -1.64 · 95% CI -2.84 to -0.43
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 8.17 · 95% CI 4.79 to 11.56
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 9.37 · 95% CI 5.81 to 12.92
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Overall Population)

MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain atrophy. Volumetric MRI (vMRI) parameters were measured in brain regions: bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole lateral ventricles, and bilateral whole brain. The atrophy was assessed by tensor-based morphometry, which captures volume changes within the deformation map. LS Mean change from baseline was determined by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with fixed effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and adjusted for baseline volume, baseline tau PET category, age at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · cm^3
Change From Baseline to End Time Point in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) Measures (Overall Population)
cm^30.75mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689Placebo
Bilateral Hippocampus-0.21 ± 0.018-0.17 ± 0.018-0.29 ± 0.017
Bilateral Whole Lateral Ventricles4.95 ± 0.4445.74 ± 0.4557.16 ± 0.409
Bilateral Whole Brain-15.61 ± 1.292-14.62 ± 1.313-22.78 ± 1.195
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 0.08 · 95% CI 0.04 to 0.13
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 0.12 · 95% CI 0.08 to 0.17
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -2.21 · 95% CI -3.33 to -1.08
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.015 · Ls mean difference: -1.42 · 95% CI -2.57 to -0.28
  • 0.75mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 7.17 · 95% CI 3.95 to 10.40
  • 3 mg LY3372689 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 8.16 · 95% CI 4.85 to 11.47
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK): Plasma Concentrations of LY3372689

Blood samples were measured at week 64 to assess the concentration of LY3372689 in the plasma.

Time frame:
Week 64: Post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Plasma Concentrations of LY3372689
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Plasma Concentrations of LY33726893.95 ± 16312.9 ± 212

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 124 weeks (Double-blind treatment period); 9 months on average (Post-treatment follow-up and Post treatment observational extension period). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
0.75 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)0/108 (0%)13/108 (12%)75/108 (69.4%)
3 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)1/110 (0.9%)29/110 (26.4%)72/110 (65.5%)
Placebo (Double Blind Period)1/108 (0.9%)16/108 (14.8%)81/108 (75%)
0.75mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)1/83 (1.2%)2/83 (2.4%)0/83 (0%)
3 mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)2/71 (2.8%)4/71 (5.6%)0/71 (0%)
Placebo (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)1/88 (1.1%)9/88 (10.2%)0/88 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 77
Most frequent serious events
Event0.75 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)3 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)Placebo (Double Blind Period)0.75mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)3 mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)Placebo (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/400/460/400/301/290/35
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1083/1101/1080/830/710/88
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1081/1102/1080/831/710/88
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1080/1102/1080/830/710/88
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1082/1101/1081/830/711/88
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/1080/1100/1080/831/710/88
Arteriosclerosis coronary arteryCardiac disorders0/1080/1100/1080/831/710/88
Rectal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/1080/1100/1080/831/710/88
Failure to thriveMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1080/1100/1080/831/710/88
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders1/1081/1100/1080/831/710/88
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
Event0.75 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)3 mg LY3372689 (Double Blind Period)Placebo (Double Blind Period)0.75mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)3 mg LY3372689 (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)Placebo (Post-treatment Follow up Period and Post Treatment Observational Extension Period)
Covid-19Infections and infestations24/10817/11023/1080/830/710/88
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications20/10816/11015/1080/830/710/88
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/10813/1106/1080/830/710/88
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations14/10811/1108/1080/830/710/88
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders13/10812/11012/1080/830/710/88
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations8/1088/11013/1080/830/710/88
Electrocardiogram qt prolongedInvestigations8/10810/1105/1080/830/710/88
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/1087/1109/1080/830/710/88
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/1084/1107/1080/830/710/88
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/1085/1106/1080/830/710/88

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Mean73.3 ± 5.4073.4 ± 5.3873.4 ± 5.4773.4 ± 5.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Female706368201
Male404640126
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino44210
Not Hispanic or Latino104102102308
Unknown or Not Reported2349
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian12141137
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American3137
White959494283
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Australia1481032
Canada12121034
Japan11131135
Poland16211855
United States575559171
Baseline Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score
Baseline Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score(Score on a scale)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Mean111.8 ± 11.99109.3 ± 13.25110.4 ± 12.77110.5 ± 12.68
Screening Tau Category
Screening Tau Category(Participants)0.75 mg LY33726893 mg LY3372689PlaceboTotal
Intermediate (Low-medium)878686259
High23232268
08

Study locations

69 sites
  • Hope Clinical Research, Inc.
    Canoga Park, California 91303, United States
  • Neuro-Pain Medical Center
    Fresno, California 93710, United States
  • Irvine Clinical Research
    Irvine, California 92614, United States
  • Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • JEM Research Institute
    Atlantis, Florida 33462, United States
  • VIN-Julie Schwartzbard
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Neurology Offices of South Florida
    Boca Raton, Florida 33428, United States
  • Brain Matters Research
    Delray Beach, Florida 33445, United States
  • Neuropsychiatric Research Center of Southwest Florida
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • K2 Medical Research
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • ClinCloud - Viera
    Melbourne, Florida 32940, United States
  • Merritt Island Medical Research, LLC
    Merritt Island, Florida 32952, United States
  • VIN-Andrew Lerman
    Miami, Florida 33133, United States
  • IMIC, Inc.
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • VIN-Victor Faradji
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34470, United States
  • VIN- Margarita Almeida El-Ramey
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • Brain Matters Research
    Stuart, Florida 34997, United States
  • Charter Research - Lady Lake
    The Villages, Florida 32162, United States
  • Josephson Wallack Munshower Neurology, PC
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Boston Center for Memory
    Newton, Massachusetts 02459, United States
  • Donald S. Marks M.D., P.C.
    Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360, United States
  • MedVadis Research Corporation
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
  • Adams Clinical
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • The Cognitive and Research Center of New Jersey
    Springfield, New Jersey 07081, United States
  • Advanced Memory Research Institute of New Jersey
    Toms River, New Jersey 08755, United States
  • University at Buffalo - UBMD Neurology
    Buffalo, New York 14203, United States
  • Abington Neurological Associates, Ltd.
    Abington, Pennsylvania 19001, United States
  • Keystone Clinical Studies
    Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania 19462, United States
  • Rhode Island Mood & Memory Research Institute
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02914, United States
  • Kerwin Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • The Memory Clinic
    Bennington, Vermont 05201-9810, United States
  • Central Coast Neurosciences Research (Tumbi Umbi)
    Central Coast, New South Wales 2261, Australia
  • St Vincent's Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • HammondCare Greenwich Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2065, Australia
  • Hornsby Ku-Ring-Gai Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2077, Australia
  • KARA Institute for Neurological Diseases
    Sydney, New South Wales 2113, Australia
  • Private Practice - Dr PL Morris
    Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia
  • Box Hill Hospital
    Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
  • NeuroCentrix
    Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
  • Delmont Private Hospital
    Glen Iris, Victoria 3146, Australia
  • HammondCare
    Malvern, Victoria 3144, Australia
  • Bruyère Research Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada
  • Clinique de la Mémoire de l'Outaouais
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 1G3, Canada
  • Ottawa Memory Clinic
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 1G3, Canada
  • Toronto Memory Program
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 2S7, Canada
  • Diex Recherche Sherbrooke Inc.
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1L 0H8, Canada
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
    Ōbu, Aichi-ken 4748511, Japan
  • Himeji Central Hospital Affiliated Clinic
    Himeji, Hyōgo 672-8043, Japan
  • Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
    Kobe, Hyōgo 650-0047, Japan
  • Memory Clinic Toride
    Toride, Ibaraki 302-0004, Japan
  • Oita University Hospital
    Yufu, Oita Prefecture 879-5593, Japan
  • Katayama Medical Clinic
    Kurashiki, Okayama-ken 710-0813, Japan
  • Nozomi Memory Clinic
    Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181-0013, Japan
  • Kikukawa Clinic
    Nerima City, Tokyo 179-0072, Japan
  • Memory Clinic Ochanomizu
    Tokyo, 113-0034, Japan
  • Nzoz Neuro-Kard Ilkowski i Partnerzy SPL
    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship 61-853, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne NEUROMED
    Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship 85-163, Poland
  • Diamond Clinic
    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship 31-559, Poland
  • Wroclawskie Centrum Alzheimerowskie
    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship 53-203, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne NeuroProtect
    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship 01-684, Poland
  • Podlaskie Centrum Psychogeriatrii
    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship 15-756, Poland
  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o.
    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship 80-546, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne SENIOR
    Sopot, Pomeranian Voivodeship 81-855, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Euromedis
    Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship 70-111, Poland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fleisher AS, Munsie L, Mancini M, Cheng YJ, Guo J, Nuthall H, Otero DS, Kotari V, Kielbasa W, Hutton M, Brys M, Mergott DJ, Mintun M, Hansson O. Ceperognastat in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Jul 13. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.12768. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42441396 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and European Union (EU), whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.

Access criteria: A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05063539
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2021
Start date
Sep 16, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 9, 2024
Completion
May 22, 2025
Results posted
Jul 28, 2025
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Study contacts

Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
study director · Eli Lilly and Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: LY3372689

Start the discussion