ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05059899WALKSTRONGUpdated Aug 22, 2023

Home-based Circuit Training for People With Intermittent Claudication

An interventional study of Exercise group in Peripheral Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication, sponsored by Coventry University. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-22.

Sponsored by Coventry University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of a 12-week home-based exercise programme for people with intermittent claudication.

Read the detailed description

30 participants with PAD will be randomised to one of two groups: either exercise or usual care. The 12 week exercise intervention will consist of a home-based circuit programme, including both resistance exercises and walking. This will be combined with promoting free-living walking throughout the rest of the week. Exercise will be regulated via the use of a wearable activity monitor. Biweekly phone calls will address compliance with the intervention. The primary outcomes are feasibility and acceptability, which will be determined after 12 weeks via recruitment and attrition rates, protocol adherence and with participant interviews. Secondary outcomes include changes in pain-free and maximal walking distances with both a graded treadmill test and six-minute walk test, hand grip strength, physical activity behaviour (measured with an accelerometer), quality of life (measured with the SF-36, VascuQol and E5-5D-5L questionnaires) after 12 and 24 weeks. Investigators will also assess changes in markers of inflammation, vascular remodeling, mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative stress at 12 and 24 weeks. Other outcomes include changes in time spent resting during a six-minute walk test and time to pain cessation following a graded treadmill test at 12 and 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Intermittent Claudication

Keywords

  • home-based exercise
  • circuit training
  • walking
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 73 across 1,078 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Coventry University is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ankle/brachial index (ABPI) \< 0.9 at rest or a drop of 20mmHg after exercise testing
  • Ability to walk independently
  • English speaking
  • Able to follow instructions
  • ≥ 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Walking impairment for a reason that is not PAD
  • Critical limb ischaemia
  • Asymptomatic PAD
  • Active cancer treatment
  • Severe mental or physical limitations precluding participation safely in the home environment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise group

    Home-based circuit and community walking exercise

    Behavioral: Exercise group

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Usual activity/healthcare

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise group

    The exercise group will receive a 12-week home-based exercise programme, with a wearable activity watch to regulate physical activity behaviour. This group will also receive biweekly telephone calls from the investigator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intervention feasibility assessed via recruitment rate

    The investigators will record the number of eligible participants, as well as the number who enroll onto the study.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated after the intervention period (i.e.. 24 weeks after inclusion)

  2. Intervention feasibility assessed via attrition rate

    The investigators will record the number of protocol discontinuations and losses to follow-up.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated after the intervention period (i.e.. 24 weeks after inclusion)

  3. Intervention feasibility assessed via protocol adherence

    The investigators will examine discrepancies between intervention prescription and what is completed.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated after the intervention period (i.e.. 24 weeks after inclusion)

  4. Intervention acceptability via participant interviews

    One-to-one interviews will be held between an investigator and participant who has either completed the intervention, withdrawn or declined participation, to ask questions regarding the intervention protocol.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated after the intervention period (either at 12 week or 24 week follow up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 12 and 24 week change in six-minute walk distance and pain-free walk distance

    Change in six-minute and pain-free walk distance after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  2. 12 and 24 week change in pain-free and maximal treadmill walk distance

    Change in pain-free and maximal treadmill walk distance after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  3. 12 and 24 weeks change in left and right hand grip strength (via hand held dynamometer)

    Change in left and right hand grip strength after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  4. 12 and 24 week change in physical activity measured by accelerometer data

    Change in physical activity behaviour at 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group, using accelerometer data.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  5. 12 and 24 week change in SF-36 score

    Change in 36 Item Short Form survey scores at 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group. (Score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores associated with a better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  6. 12 and 24 week change in VascuQol questionnaire score

    Change in Vascular Quality of Life questionnaire scores at 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group. (Score ranges from 1-7, with higher scores associated with a better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  7. 12 and 24 week change in EQ-5D-5L questionnaire score

    Change in European Quality of Life Five Dimension questionnaire scores at 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group. (Scores range from 1-5, with lower scores associated with a better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  8. 12 and 24 week change in circulating markers of inflammation

    Investigators will compare blood sample measures of IL-6, TNF-α, CRP between participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group at 12 and 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  9. 12 and 24 week change in circulating markers of vascular remodelling

    Investigators will compare blood sample measures of VEGF between participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group at 12 and 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. 12 and 24 week change in rest times during a six-minute walk test

    Change in time spent resting during a six-minute walk test after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  2. 12 and 24 week change in pain cessation following a treadmill test

    Change in time to pain cessation following a treadmill test after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  3. 12 and 24 week changes in walking speed during a six-minute walk test

    Change in walking speed during a six-minute walk test after 12 and 24 weeks will be compared to participants randomised to the exercise group vs the usual care group.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Coventry University
    Coventry, West Midlands CV1 2DS, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Waddell A, Denton F, Powell R, Broom DR, Birkett ST, McGregor G, Harwood AE. "It's put a routine and regimen in my life" - Participant experiences with a programme of community walking and home-based circuit training for intermittent claudication. J Vasc Nurs. 2024 Dec;42(4):276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 28. PubMed 39645388 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05059899
Lead sponsor
Coventry University
Collaborators
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Responsible party
Alex Waddell (Principle Investigator, Coventry University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2021
Start date
May 9, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2023
Completion
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Aug 22, 2023

Study contacts

Alexander Waddell, MSc
principal investigator · Coventry University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion