ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05036200PDLUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Interest of PDL in the Management of Telangiectasia of the Face and Neckline in Systemic Scleroderma

An interventional study of pulsed dye laser in Telangiectasia, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2019, registered Jul 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single-center, prospective, open-label, quasi-experimental, intra-individual comparative study will include a consecutive cohort of 21 patients with diffuse or limited, minimally active scleroderma with 3 to 30 years of evolution.

Patients will have 4 sessions of pulsed dye laser 595 nm spaced 8 weeks apart. The final quadruple evaluation by several evaluators will be 2 months after the last session, on the following criteria: evolution of the number of telangiectasia; subjective improvement score (LINKERT scale); impact on quality of life (SKINDEX score); visual analog pain scale (VAS); adverse events (AEs), including discontinuation of treatment due to post-session purpura (AT-PPS); patient satisfaction (yes or no).

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment on facial and neckline telangiectasias in systemic scleroderma by comparing the mean number of telangiectasias.

Secondary Objectives:

Evaluation of the aesthetic efficacy by the patient, observer and adjudication committee Evaluation of the impact on the quality of life after treatment (skindex) Evaluation of treatment tolerance in terms of pain (VAS) and adverse events (purpura, oozing, hyperpigmentation, hospitalization)

02

Conditions studied

  • Telangiectasia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Telangiectasis

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 30 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Telangiectasis.

Browse Telangiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient followed in dermatology and/or internal medicine at the University Hospital of Caen for systemic scleroderma
  • patient with telangiectasias related to scleroderma
  • patient with an aesthetic prejudice

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with previous laser treatment for facial telangiectasias.
  • Tanned, irritated or traumatized facial skin
  • Patient not affiliated to the Social Security system
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    four pulsed dye laser sessions were administered every eight weeks in the 21 patients

    Device: pulsed dye laser

Interventions

  • Devicepulsed dye laser

    four pulsed dye laser sessions were administered every eight weeks in the 21 patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the decrease in the number of telangiectasia

    Time frame: baseline and two months after last intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of quality of life after pulsed dye laser treatment using the SKINDEX questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline and two months after last intervention

Other outcomes

  1. evaluation of the aesthetic improvement with an improvement score scored using a LIKERT scale from -1 to +2: from -1= worse; 0= unchanged ; +1= improved ; +2= much improved

    Time frame: baseline and two months after last intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chu Caen Normandie
    Caen, Normandy 14000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mayo TT, Khan F, Hunt C, Fleming K, Markus R. Comparative study on bruise reduction treatments after bruise induction using the pulsed dye laser. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1459-64. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12293. Epub 2013 Jul 30. PubMed 23899131 ↗
  • Yalcinkaya Y, Pehlivan O, Omma A, Alpay N, Erer B, Kamali S, Ocal L, Inanc M. The relationship between nailfold capillaroscopic assessment and telangiectasia score with severity of peripheral vascular involvement in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jul-Aug;33(4 Suppl 91):S92-7. Epub 2015 Mar 23. PubMed 25797836 ↗
  • Kottler D, Dupechez L, Martin Silva N, Boutemy J, Dumont A, Maigne G, Aouba A, Dompmartin A. Efficacy, tolerance and acceptability of pulsed dye laser on facial and neckline telangiectasias in systemic scleroderma: a prospective open-label monocentric study in 21 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2023 Nov 17;25(5-8):77-85. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2024.2313472. Epub 2024 Feb 19. PubMed 38373440 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2019 to primary completion in Sep 2019, 1 month.

Of 14 interventional studies with no phase under Telangiectasis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 27. This study's 1 month is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2021
First posted
Sep 5, 2021
StartActual
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2020
Last update
Apr 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05036200
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2019
Completion
Jul 1, 2020
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion