CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05021601Updated Jun 13, 2024

Bi-atrial Versus Left Atrial Ablation for Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Valve Disease and Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of Bi-atrial ablation and Left atrial ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-13.

Sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
320
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is aimed to compare the efficacy of bi-atrial ablation with left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in 40%-60% of patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD), which is an independent predictor of mortality and late stroke. During mitral valve (MV) surgery, the open left atrium facilitates a bi-atrial ablation procedure. However, a simplified lesion set including isolated pulmonary vein isolation or posterior left atrial (LA) wall isolation or LA maze was usually applied. The current literatures provide insufficient evidence to determine the potential benefits of bi-atrial ablation procedure when comparing with LA ablation procrdure in patients with non-paroxysmal AF and RMVD.

Patients with RMVD often have longer history, which tends to affect the right atrium, including pulmonary hypertension or tricuspid regurgitation.The necessity of bi-atrial ablation procedure targeting the bi-atrial substrate for AF in RMVD requires to be explored. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of bi-atrial ablation with LA ablation for AF during MV surgery in patients with RMVD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • Rheumatic mitral valve disease
  • Surgical ablation
  • Mitral valve surgery
03

In context

Rheumatic Diseases

377 studies on the registry are indexed under Rheumatic Diseases; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 320 is above the median of 74 across 210 interventional studies indexed under Rheumatic Diseases.

Browse Rheumatic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases is the lead sponsor of 256 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of persistent atrial fibrillation(AF) or long-standing persistent AF by medical history and Holter monitoring (persistent AF lasting more than 7 days; long-standing persistent AF lasting more than 1 year).
  • Rheumatic mitral valve disease(RMVD) requires mitral valve surgery( RMVD was determined by history of acute rheumatic fever, valve morphology, echocardiographic findings and pathological diagnosis).
  • Consent to surgical ablation of AF

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Paroxysmal AF
  • Degenerative or ischemic mitral valve disease
  • Evidence of active infection
  • Previous catheter ablation or surgical ablation for AF
  • Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy
  • Left atrial thrombosis (not including left atrial appendage thrombosis alone)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)\<30% anticipated value)
  • Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism
  • Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow participants to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study
  • Left atrial diameter>70mm
  • Right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE\<16) or moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary artery pressure (estimated by echocardiography) >60mmHg
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting is required for participants with coronary heart disease
  • Previous cardiac surgery
  • Refuse to participate in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
320 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bi-atrial ablation group

    Participants in this group will receive mitral valve surgery concomitant with bi-atrial ablation procedure.

    Procedure: Bi-atrial ablation

  • Active comparator
    Left atrial ablation group

    Participants in this group will receive mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation procedure.

    Procedure: Left atrial ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureBi-atrial ablation

    This intervention includes mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation and right atrial ablation.

  • ProcedureLeft atrial ablation

    This intervention includes mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation alone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs

    Without detections of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or other atrial tachyarrhythmias with a duration of greater than 30 seconds documented by 3-day Holter monitoring in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs.

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival rate without permanent pacemaker implantation (Key secondary outcome)

    Percentage of participants who did not have a new permanent pacemaker implanted.

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

  2. Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs

    Without detections of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or other atrial tachyarrhythmias with a duration of greater than 30 seconds documented by 3-day Holter monitoring with antiarrhythmic drugs.

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

  3. Burden of atrial fibrillation

    Burden of atrial fibrillation according to 3-day Holter monitoring.

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

  4. Major adverse events

    Including cardiac death, stroke, heart failure requiring rehospitalization, embolic events or bleeding events requiring rehospitalization.

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

  5. Cardiac function

    Documented by echocardiography (left ventricular ejection fraction).

    Time frame: At 12-month after intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Fuwai Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing, China
    Recruiting
  • Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
    Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
    • Xin Chen · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05021601
Lead sponsor
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2021
Start date
May 10, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 13, 2024

Study contacts

Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD
Contact
zhengzhe@fuwai.com
: +86-010-88396051
Chunyu Yu, MD
Contact
yuchunyu@fuwai.com
Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD
study chair · Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion