ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05011877SIMPLIFYUpdated May 20, 2025

The Simplify Project

An observational study in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-20.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 13 studies in Respiratory Insufficiency by Unity Health Toronto — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Respiratory Insufficiency · Unity Health Toronto.

Started
2021
the only one that year
Observational
8 of 13
2 open now
Registered
10th of 13
by date

Among the 13 studies in Respiratory Insufficiency by Unity Health Toronto, this one is the only one that started in 2021, is one of 8 observational ones, and was the 10th registered.

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,369 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 264 are open to participants now.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 13 studies in Respiratory Insufficiency by Unity Health Toronto are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 4 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 180 Respiratory Insufficiency studies recruiting now, 135 (75%) set no upper age limit and 18 (10%) stop at 75 or younger; 21 take children under 18; 20 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 13 studies in Respiratory Insufficiency by Unity Health Toronto, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The high frequency of unplanned hospital visits of patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity-related hypoventilation) constitutes a major public health problem. Most patients admitted for acute exacerbations (AHRF) have additional comorbidities, especially sleep disorders. Often untreated, sleep disorders contribute to multiple readmissions (≈70% at one year) and increase readmission costs. The investigators will: 1) identify these patients early during unplanned hospital admissions and perform sleep studies using EEG and oximetry before hospital discharge and two months after to compare sleep abnormalities in the two moments; 2) investigate the association between sleep abnormalities in the two sleep studies with clinical outcomes (1-year readmission and death); 3) investigate the acute effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to treat sleep abnormalities as a simplified alternative. The investigators anticipate sleep abnormalities during the hospital stay and two months after discharge will be associated with poor clinical outcomes (readmission, death) and HFNC to acutely reduce sleep abnormalities.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will perform sleep studies using nocturnal EEG measurements and oximetry 1) while the participants are still in the hospital but have reached relative clinical stability (≥48 h after admission, not in ICU and pHv ≥7.36) and 2) two months after hospital discharge at the participant's home. Sleep studies will be performed from 5:00 pm to 8 am. EEG measurements will be performed using a portable monitor (Prodigy Sleep System, Cerebra, Winnipeg, Canada). Sleep assessment will be performed offline. The ORP will be continuously quantified and ORP-derived indices will be calculated. Nocturnal oximetry will be used for detecting sleep desaturation episodes. Comorbidities (e.g., obesity, diagnosed lung or heart disease, Charlson comorbidity index) and exacerbations/hospitalization in the previous year will be identified.

In 21 participants, the investigators will perform one additional sleep study with the participants breathing with high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) to investigate the acute impact (i.e., during one night) of HFNC on reducing sleep abnormalities. HFNC will be set from 25 - 60 L/min based on participant's tolerance and the inspired fraction of oxygen will be titrated to maintain patient SpO2 similar to the levels during standard oxygen therapy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
  • Patient Readmission
  • Mortality
  • Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (pH \<7.35 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg at admission) admitted for an unplanned hospitalization or emergency room visit.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients requiring an unplanned hospitalization or emergency room visit due to an acute hypercapnic respiratory failure exacerbation (AHRF), not on home noninvasive or invasive ventilation, neuromuscular disease (e.g., spinal cord injury) or central nervous system disorders (e.g., cerebral vascular accident, Alzheimer), absence of tracheotomy, and non-morbidly obese.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with AHRF due to drug overdose
  • Ventilatory support (noninvasive or invasive ventilation) is needed before or during the sleep studies or if an acute deterioration (e.g., cerebral vascular accident, cardiac arrest) happens before or during the sleep studies.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure patients with Sleep Disorders

    Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure patients with Sleep Disorders

    Device: High-flow nasal cannula therapy

  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure patients without Sleep Disorders

    Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure patients without Sleep Disorders

    Device: High-flow nasal cannula therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-flow nasal cannula therapy

    High-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) (from 25 - 60 L/min based on patient's tolerance) will be used in 21 participants during one additional sleep study to investigate its acute impact on reducing sleep abnormalities. Inspired fraction of oxygen will be titrated to maintain patient SpO2 similar to the levels during standard oxygen therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1-year hospital readmission and 1-year mortality

    The primary endpoint is to compare the rate of 1-year Hospital readmission and mortality between patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with vs. without sleep abnormalities during the home sleep study measured by the odds ratio product (ORP) and the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital length of stay

    The secondary endpoint is to compare the length of stay during the hospital admission between patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with vs. without sleep abnormalities during the sleep study performed at the hospital measured by the odds ratio product (ORP) and the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Need of ventilatory support

    The secondary endpoint is to compare the need of invasive and non-invasive ventilatory support between patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with vs. without sleep abnormalities during the sleep study performed at the hospital measured by the odds ratio product (ORP) and the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Need of ICU admission

    The secondary endpoint is to compare the need of ICU admission between patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with vs. without sleep abnormalities during the sleep study performed at the hospital measured by the odds ratio product (ORP) and the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. In-hospital mortality

    The secondary endpoint is to compare the rate of in-hospital mortality between patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with vs. without sleep abnormalities during the sleep study performed at the hospital measured by the odds ratio product (ORP) and the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. HFNC effects on sleep depth according to the ORP range

    In 21 patients. Time spend in different ORP ranges during the sleep study which the patients used the standard oxygen therapy and the night which the patients used HFNC.

    Time frame: 15 hours

  6. Sleep depth according to the ORP during the sleep study performed at the hospital and at home

    Time spend in different ORP ranges during the sleep study performed in the hospital vs. at home.

    Time frame: 15 hours

  7. HFNC effects on sleep depth according to the AASM criteria

    In 21 patients. Time spend in different sleep stages (AASM 2017 rules) during the sleep study which the patients used the standard oxygen therapy and the night which the patients used HFNC.

    Time frame: 15 hours

  8. HFNC effects on the prevalence of sleep abnormalities

    In 21 patients. The prevalence of sleep abnormalities during the sleep study which the patients used the standard oxygen therapy and the night which the patients used HFNC.

    Time frame: 15 hours

  9. Sleep depth according to the AASM at the hospital vs. home

    Time spend in different sleep stages (AASM 2017 rules) during the sleep study performed at the hospital vs. at patient's home.

    Time frame: 15 hours

  10. Prevalence of sleep abnormalities at the hospital vs. home

    The prevalence of sleep abnormalities during the sleep study performed at the hospital vs. at home.

    Time frame: 15 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Laurent Brochard, MD, MD, HDR · Contact4168645686
    • Antenor Rodrigues · Sub investigator
    • Laurent Brochard · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Younes M, Ostrowski M, Soiferman M, Younes H, Younes M, Raneri J, Hanly P. Odds ratio product of sleep EEG as a continuous measure of sleep state. Sleep. 2015 Apr 1;38(4):641-54. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4588. PubMed 25348125 ↗
  • Sharma S, Mather PJ, Chowdhury A, Gupta S, Mukhtar U, Willes L, Whellan DJ, Malhotra A, Quan SF. Sleep Overnight Monitoring for Apnea in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure (SOMA-HF Study). J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Oct 15;13(10):1185-1190. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6768. PubMed 28859720 ↗
  • Younes M, Soiferman M, Thompson W, Giannouli E. Performance of a New Portable Wireless Sleep Monitor. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Feb 15;13(2):245-258. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6456. PubMed 27784419 ↗
  • Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo C, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Quan SF, Troester MT, Vaughn BV. AASM Scoring Manual Updates for 2017 (Version 2.4). J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 May 15;13(5):665-666. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6576. No abstract available. PubMed 28416048 ↗
  • Dres M, Younes M, Rittayamai N, Kendzerska T, Telias I, Grieco DL, Pham T, Junhasavasdikul D, Chau E, Mehta S, Wilcox ME, Leung R, Drouot X, Brochard L. Sleep and Pathological Wakefulness at the Time of Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation (SLEEWE). A Prospective Multicenter Physiological Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 May 1;199(9):1106-1115. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201811-2119OC. PubMed 30818966 ↗
  • Drouot X, Roche-Campo F, Thille AW, Cabello B, Galia F, Margarit L, d'Ortho MP, Brochard L. A new classification for sleep analysis in critically ill patients. Sleep Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Dec 6. PubMed 22153778 ↗
  • Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30888444 ↗
  • Nishimura M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Adults: Physiological Benefits, Indication, Clinical Benefits, and Adverse Effects. Respir Care. 2016 Apr;61(4):529-41. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04577. PubMed 27016353 ↗
  • Sklar MC, Dres M, Rittayamai N, West B, Grieco DL, Telias I, Junhasavasdikul D, Rauseo M, Pham T, Madotto F, Campbell C, Tullis E, Brochard L. High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Sep 5;8(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4. PubMed 30187270 ↗
  • Rittayamai N, Phuangchoei P, Tscheikuna J, Praphruetkit N, Brochard L. Effects of high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation on inspiratory effort in hypercapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preliminary study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0597-5. PubMed 31641959 ↗
  • Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13. PubMed 20406507 ↗
  • Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17. PubMed 25981908 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 58 months after the start.

Of 232 non-industry observational studies under Respiratory Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 58 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 248 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2021
First posted
Aug 18, 2021
StartActual
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
May 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05011877
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2025

Study contacts

Laurent Brochard, MD, PhD
Contact
Laurent.Brochard@unityhealth.to
416-864-5686
Antenor Rodrigues, PT
Contact
Antenor.Rodrigues@unityhealth.to
Laurent Brochard, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion