ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03033251HiFOLDUpdated May 20, 2025

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

An interventional study of Non Invasive Ventilation and High Flow Oxygen Cannula 50 in Exacerbation Copd, Acute Respiratory Distress and Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-20.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2018; still recruiting 8 years 2 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 16 studies in Acute Lung Injury with a site in Canada — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Acute Lung Injury · Canada.

Planned enrollment
11th of 13
30 · median 90
Started
2018
the only one that year
No phase
4 of 16
2 open now
Registered
13th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies in Acute Lung Injury with a site in Canada, this one is the 11th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 4 with no phase, and was the 13th registered.

Acute Lung Injury

382 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Lung Injury; 73 are open to participants now.

Browse Acute Lung Injury studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 16 studies in Acute Lung Injury with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 45 Acute Lung Injury studies recruiting now, 25 (56%) set no upper age limit and 8 (18%) stop at 75 or younger; 6 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Acute Lung Injury with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Chronic obstructive lung disease is a disabling disease that affects people usually after several years of smoke tobacco exposure and affects millions of patients worldwide. The disease is marked by multiples episode of worsening, termed exacerbations necessitating frequent hospitalizations. During these exacerbations, patients present breathless, and in the most severe cases, are admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for respiratory assistance. Currently, respiratory assistance is provided by a ventilator via a oronasal mask (referred to non-invasive ventilation, NIV), that helps patients to cope with their breathless. The mask is not always well tolerated and the ventilator sessions are delivered intermittently. In the past decade, a new technique that provides air-oxygen with high flow has been developed. This technique, called High Flow via Nasal Cannula (HFNC) can deliver from 21 to 100% heated and humidified air-oxygen at a high flow of gas via simple nasal cannula. Recent studies have shown that the technique is very efficient to treat patients presenting with acute respiratory failure who don't have any underlying chronic pulmonary disease. Whether the technique would be also efficient in patients with COLD presenting with severe exacerbations has not yet been demonstrated. Since HFNC does not require any mask, it is thought that the comfort of the patient would be much better in comparison to NIV and could potentially help to treat many patients with the disease. The objective of the present study is to study the physiological effect of HFNC as compared to NIV in patients with severe exacerbations of COPD and to show that it is non-inferior to NIV.

Read the detailed description

Design: Prospective, observational, cross-over, clinical physiologic study of HFNC and NIV in patients with COPD and hypercapnic respiratory failure Intervention: Participants will be consecutively ventilated with the two devices, i.e., HFNC and NIV. HFNC 30 and 50 L/min will be applied in a random order (sealed, opaque envelope). HFNC will be set with a temperature at 37°C or 34°C if perceived as too warm. NIV settings will be adjusted based on the clinical assessment of the Respiratory Therapist as per standard practice and will not be modified during the test. In both groups, FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 of at least 92%.

Setting: The intervention will be applied in the Medical-Surgical ICU of St. Michael's Hospital.

Duration: Each device will be studied for up to 30 minutes. The entire study will take place over up to 3 hours. There is no additional follow-up thereafter.

Procedures: The study will start first by recording patients under spontaneous breathing considered as a baseline (sequence #1). Under spontaneous breathing, patients will be receiving oxygen therapy as it is usually done between 2 NIV sessions. Then, the patient will have up to 30 minutes to acclimatize to HFNC and select his/her preferred flow rate (sequence #2). NIV will be applied (sequence #3). The NIV settings will be adjusted based on the clinical assessment of the Respiratory Therapist and will not be modified throughout the study. Then, according to randomization order (sealed envelopes), patients will receive a flow corresponding to the preferred flow selected by the patient and a second flow, either HFNC 30 L/min or HFNC 50 L/min depending on the initial choice (sequences #4 and #5) (see flow diagram). FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 of 90 to 94%. Each condition will be studied fup to 30 minutes and will be separated by a 5-minute washout period during which patients will be receiving oxygen therapy. The measurements will be collected at baseline (under spontaneous breathing) and during the last five minutes of each condition. In case of clinical intolerance as considered by the attending physician, the study will stop. In case the patient is considered dependent of NIV by clinicians, we will still enroll the patient without doing baseline period after discussion with clinicians.

The pulse oximeter (SpO2) and transcutaneous CO2 monitor (SenTec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS)) will be continuously monitored throughout the study period. Exspiron or Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) device will be calibrated to measure minute ventilation. Four surface electrodes will be placed bilaterally to record each hemidiaphragm activity using a specific recording system (Acqknowledge software, Biopac Systems) A bedside ultrasound examination will be performed, using a SonoSite system (Fujifilm) equipped with a 10-15 MHz ultrasound linear probe. Diaphragm thickness will be measured both at end-inspiration and end-expiration. This technique will be applied at the end of each sequence (before ventilatory assist under conventional O2 therapy). In patients becoming rapidly intolerant to NIV disconnection, we will limit this "baseline" period under O2 to a minimum (5 minutes). The thickness and contraction of the intercostal muscles and abdominal muscles will also be assessed.

Interpretation of the ultrasound results to determine diaphragm and other muscle thickness will be read at a later time by an individual blinded to the intervention.

03

Conditions studied

  • Exacerbation Copd
  • Acute Respiratory Distress
  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • COPD exacerbation
  • Work of breathing
  • Non invasive ventilation
  • High Flow Oxygen Cannula
  • Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. exacerbation and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acute respiratory failure defined by

    • Respiratory acidosis (pH ≤7.35 and PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg);
    • Respiratory rate≥20 breaths/min;
    • Activation of accessory respiratory muscles;
  2. Undergone at NIV or HFNC since their admission
  3. English speaking
  4. Adult patient with age > 40 year old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.25
  2. Decreased level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Score Scale \< 11)
  3. Urgent intubation required
  4. Pneumothorax with pleural drainage and persistent air leak
  5. Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors
  6. Uncooperative
  7. Patients with skin or chest wall or abdominal trauma (potentially worsened by placement of a surface sensor)
  8. Clinical judgement of the attending physician
  9. > 40 kg/m2
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Non invasive ventilation

    Patients will receive non invasive ventilation with setting decided by the attending physician.

    Device: Non Invasive Ventilation

  • Active comparator
    High Flow 50 L/min

    High Flow Oxygen Cannula with a flow set at 50 L/min.

    Device: High Flow Oxygen Cannula 50

  • Active comparator
    High Flow 30 L/min

    High Flow Oxygen Cannula with a flow set at 30 L/min.

    Device: High Flow Oxygen Cannula 30

Interventions

  • DeviceNon Invasive Ventilation

    Patients will receive non invasive ventilation as a standard of care.

    Also known as: Standard of Care

  • DeviceHigh Flow Oxygen Cannula 50

    Patients will receive High Flow Oxygen Cannula with a flow set at 50 L/min

    Also known as: HFNO 50

  • DeviceHigh Flow Oxygen Cannula 30

    Patients will receive High Flow Oxygen Cannula with a flow set at 30 L/min

    Also known as: HFNO 30

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in work of breathing between NIV and HFNC

    The primary endpoint is to compare the decrease in work of breathing under HFNC to the decrease in work of breathing under NIV. The work of breathing will be assessed with diaphragm ultrasound (measurement of the diaphragm thickening fraction).

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Work of breathing between HFNC 50 and 30 L/min

    The secondary endpoints include comparison of the work of breathing under HFNC (50L/min vs 30 L/min). The work of breathing will be assessed with diaphragm ultrasound (measurement of the diaphragm thickening fraction).

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 79 months.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acute Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's 79 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 52 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2017
First posted
Jan 26, 2017
StartActual
Sep 2, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 11, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
May 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03033251
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2017
Start date
Sep 2, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 11, 2025
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2025

Study contacts

Laurent Brochard, MD
Contact
BrochardL@smh.ca
+1 416 864 5686
Martin Dres, MD
Contact
DresM@smh.ca
+1 416 692 7420

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion