ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05001932ORAPSCAUpdated Nov 1, 2021

Optimizing Refractive Results and Patient Satisfaction After Cataract Surgery

An interventional study of Cataract surgery in Cataract, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-01.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cataract surgery is the most common eye surgery in the world. If the patient with cataract uses spectacles and both patient and surgeon find it beneficial, it is possible to compensate for the spectacles during surgery and thereby obtain a spectacle-free distance vision or spectacle-free near vision. Becoming spectacle free increases quality of life substantially and is one of the primary wishes in cataract patients. Socioeconomically, spectacle free life is beneficial as it reduces fall tendency in the elderly population. Multifocal lenses warrant the possibility of obtaining a spectacle free vision at near, intermediate and distance. It is also possible to obtain spectacle free distance and near vision or distance and intermediate vision by using traditional artificial monofocal lenses but making one eye spectacle free for distance and the other eye spectacle free for near or intermediate vision. Currently, it is not know which procedure is most beneficial for cataract patients.

In a recent PhD, the investigators developed a method, Aniseikonia Tolerance Range (ATR), that can assess how much refractive change a patient can endure without impairing stereopsis. The results demonstrated large variation in the tolerance of image difference. This method can be a future tool to assess whether a patient can tolerate the refraction that is considered most beneficial to the patient. The knowledge is important as it can help avoid improper lens choice in cataract surgery and thereby avoid stereopsis problems.

Read the detailed description

Background This randomized clinical trial aims to improve visual outcomes in cataract surgery by examining which intraocular lenses (IOL)/operation methods that provide highest patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle free vision. Furthermore, the tolerance of surgical induced refractive difference (anisometropia) will be examined and a screening method to assess how much anisometropia a patient can endure will be validated. The investigators will examine if the tolerance of anisometropia > 3 diopters is better than previously described and examine if ATR can predict which patients will experience binocular problems if exposed to surgical induced aniseikonia.These results will lead to higher patient satisfaction, better visual outcomes with elimination of patients with mediocre refractive results and visual problems due to anisometropia.

In addition the investigators will examine whether ATR is reproducible by examining the variation in the multiple measurements and in a prospective study the investigators will investigate the inter and intra person reproducibility of ATR.

100 refractive patients with healthy eyes except myopia > 3 diopters and \< 6 diopters, who will have a Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) surgery will have all investigations done. The patients will have a bilateral SMILE with a interval of seven weeks and will in between the two procedures have a surgically introduced anisometropia that will provide further knowledge on anisometropia and ATR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract

Keywords

  • Cataract
  • Anisometropia
  • Aniseikonia Tolerance Range
03

In context

Cataract

1,629 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 79 across 1,092 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Bilateral cataract
  • Axial length: 20-27 mm
  • ACD > 2.3 mm
  • Pupil size: ≥ 5.0 mm in dilatation
  • Pupil siza: ≥ 2.5 mm in photo topic condition
  • Stereoacuity ≤ 480 seconds of arch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Former intraocular surgery
  • Other eye disease (amblyopia, strabismus, corneal pathology, glaucoma, uveitis, age related maculopathy
  • Other retinal diseases
  • Risk of weak zonules due to PEX or former trauma
  • Astigmatism ≥ 1.0 diopter
  • Diabetes
  • Axial length difference between the two eyes > 0.3 mm
  • Dementia
  • Lack of cooperation kooperation
  • Stereoacuity > 480 seconds of arc
  • Complicated cataract surgery or postoperative complications (intraocular infection, retinal detachment, macular edema
  • Business driving
  • Night driving
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Multifocal

    Patients will receive a multifocal lens bilateral (Alcon Vivity).

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

  • Active comparator
    Mono-vision

    Patients will receive a monofocal lens bilateral. Target refraction for the dominant eye will be -0.25D and for the non-dominant myopia of -2.50D.

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

  • Active comparator
    Minimono-vision

    Patients will receive a monofocal lens bilateral. Target refraction for the dominant eye will be -0.25D and for the non-dominant -1.25D.

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

  • Active comparator
    Monofocal

    Patients will receive a monofocal lens bilateral. Target refraction will be -0.25D.

    Procedure: Cataract surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureCataract surgery

    Randomized Clinical Trial

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    Investigate if MIOLs, mono-vision and mini-vision provides better visual function, quality of vision and spectacle free vision compared to monofocal IOLs. This will be evaluated by questionnaires and objective measurements as described.

    Time frame: 120 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tolerance of anisometropia

    Investigate if the tolerance of anisometropia is better in the elderly population compared to a younger population (SMILE patients). This will be evaluated by questionnaires and objective measurements as described.

    Time frame: 120 days

  2. Aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR)

    Compare ATR in all four arms and in a SMILE population to investigate if ATR is a future screening tool that can predict which patients cannot tolerate anisometropia

    Time frame: 120 days

  3. Aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR)

    Investigate if ATR is reproducible and clinical useful in cataract patients with poor vision

    Time frame: 120 days

  4. Anisometropia

    Investigate if anisometropia \> 3 diopters are better tolerated than previously described. This will be evaluated by questionnaires and objective measurements as described.

    Time frame: 120 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2023, 23 months after the start.

Of 300 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cataract, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 23 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 490 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2021
First posted
Aug 12, 2021
StartActual
Aug 11, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Aug 4, 2023
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 1, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05001932
Responsible party
Anne Guldhammer Skov, MD (Medical doctor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2021
Start date
Aug 11, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 4, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 1, 2021

Study contacts

Anne Guldhammer Skov, MD
Contact
anne.guldhammer.skov.01@regionh.dk
+45 38 63 38 63
Morten la Cour, MD, prof.
study director · Rigshospitalet, Glostrup

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion