ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04989790PICU Up!Updated Oct 1, 2026Results posted

Clinical Effectiveness of the "PICU Up!" Multifaceted Early Mobility Intervention for Critically Ill Children

An interventional study of PICU Up! in Child, Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness and Critical Illness, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 11 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Primary conditionCritical Illness(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 1, 2026Now CompletedResults posted+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,470
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

While mortality in U.S. pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is improving, surviving children frequently develop persistent physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments. Over half of critically ill children experience potentially preventable PICU-acquired morbidities, with mechanically ventilated children being at greatest risk. In critically ill adults, randomized trials have shown that progressive mobility, started early (within 3 days of initiating mechanical ventilation), decreases muscle weakness and the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, similar randomized studies have not been conducted in the PICU. The investigator's prior studies revealed that less than 10 percent of critically ill children at the highest risk of functional decline are evaluated by a physical or occupational therapist within 3 days of PICU admission. Given the interplay of sedation, delirium, sleep, and immobility in the PICU, single-component interventions, such as sedation protocolization, have not consistently shown benefit for decreasing mechanical ventilation duration. Thus, the investigators developed the first pediatric-specific, interprofessional intervention (PICU Up!) to integrate goal-directed sedation, delirium prevention, sleep promotion, and family engagement into daily PICU care in order to facilitate early and progressive mobility. The investigators have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this pragmatic, multifaceted strategy in both single-site and multicenter pilot studies. Hence, the next phase of the investigators research is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and delivery of the PICU Up! intervention across a range of PICU patients and health systems. The investigators propose a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial that will include 10 academic and community hospitals in the United States, with the following Aims: 1) Evaluate if the PICU Up! intervention, delivered under real-world conditions, decreases mechanical ventilation duration, measured as days alive and ventilator-free (AVF) through Day 21 (primary outcome) and improves delirium and functional status compared to usual care in critically ill children; and 2) Conduct a multi-stakeholder, mixed-methods process evaluation to identify key contextual factors associated with delivery of PICU Up!. If proven effective, the PICU Up! intervention has potential to profoundly change medical care in the PICU and substantially impact public health by improving outcomes for the growing number of pediatric survivors of critical illness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Child
  • Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness
  • Critical Illness
  • Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • physical rehabilitation
  • post-intensive care syndrome
  • pediatric intensive care unit
  • sleep
  • sedation
  • delirium
  • physical therapy
  • occupational therapy
03

In context

Critical Illness Unverified

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,470 is above the median of 90 across 926 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Compared within Critical Illness, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation via oral or nasal endotracheal tube ≥ 48 hours at 7 a.m. on PICU Day 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active or anticipated withdrawal of life support within 48 hours
  • Open chest or open abdomen
  • Current use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,470 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Baseline/Pre-implementation

    Usual PICU care

  • Active comparator
    Intervention/Post-implementation

    PICU Up! is a multifaceted, inter-professional pathway that is integrated into routine PICU practice to safely optimize early and progressive patient mobility.

    Other: PICU Up!

Interventions

  • OtherPICU Up!

    PICU Up! incorporates the screening process for determining a patient's appropriate activity level into the daily rounding workflow for all PICU patients, with a tiered activity plan based on clinical parameters to individualize goals based on each child's unique needs. While the patient's PICU Up! level is based on objective criteria, the interprofessional team collectively determines the daily activity goal(s) through shared decision-making which is documented in the medical record on morning rounds. The intervention facilitates daily discussion of 1) analgesia; 2) extubation readiness testing; 3) sedation level and goal; 4) delirium screening and management; 5) mobility goal including physical and occupational therapy consultation by PICU Day 3; 6) sleep promotion; and 7) family engagement in mobility.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Days Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)

    Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation. A ventilator-free day is a calendar day during which the participant is alive and the endotracheal tube is absent for 24 continuous hours. For participants with a tracheostomy, unassisted breathing is considered ventilator-free; assisted ventilation is not.

    Time frame: Through Day 21

Secondary outcomes

  1. Days Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)

    Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant is alive, without delirium, and coma-free for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day.

    Time frame: Through Day 21

  2. Days Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)

    Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant was alive and coma-free for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day. Coma-free days are defined as days when all documented sedation scores are above the following thresholds: State Behavioral Scale (SBS) ≥ -1, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≥ -3, or COMFORT-B ≥ 10, as applicable. Days following PICU discharge through Day 21 are considered alive and coma-free unless the participant is deceased.

    Time frame: Through Day 21

  3. Days Alive

    Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant was alive for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day. Days following PICU discharge through Day 21 are considered days alive unless the participant is deceased. Participants withdrawn due to limitation of care orders or brain death evaluation are considered deceased on the day death is pronounced.

    Time frame: Through Day 21

  4. Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21

    The Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) is a 6-point scale of cerebral functional status: 1 = normal, 2 = mild disability, 3 = moderate disability, 4 = severe disability, 5 = coma or vegetative state, and 6 = death. This outcome reports the number of participants with normal cerebral performance, defined as a PCPC score of 1, at the earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21

    Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21

  5. Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21

    The Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) is a 6-point scale of overall functional status: 1 = normal/good overall performance, 2 = mild disability, 3 = moderate disability, 4 = severe disability, 5 = coma or vegetative state, and 6 = death. This outcome reports the number of participants with normal overall performance, defined as a POPC score of 1, at the earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21.

    Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21

  6. Functional Status Scale (FSS) Category at Patient Discharge

    The Functional Status Scale (FSS) assesses six domains of pediatric function: mental status, sensory functioning, communication, motor functioning, feeding, and respiratory status. Each domain is scored from 1 (normal) to 5 (very severe dysfunction), producing a total score from 6 to 30, with lower scores indicating better functional status. Participants were categorized according to their FSS score at discharge.

    Time frame: At patient discharge

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2026

Participant flow

This was a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial conducted in 10 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the United States. All sites began in the baseline/control period and transitioned to implementation of the PICU Up! intervention according to a randomly determined stepped-wedge sequence, with two PICUs transitioning at each of five sequential steps. Participant data were collected during the usual care and post-implementation periods for patients meeting eligibility criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStep 1: 10m Usual Care, 3m Implementation, 17m Post-intervention (Hospitals A & B)Step 2: 12m Usual Care, 3m Implementation, 15m Post-intervention (Hospitals C & D)Step 3: 14m Usual Care, 3m Implementation, 13m Post-intervention (Hospitals E & F)Step 4: 16m Usual Care, 3m Implementation, 11m Post-intervention (Hospitals G & H)Step 5: 18m Usual Care, 3m Implementation, 9m Post-intervention (Hospitals I & J)
Started377351275363104
Completed377351275363104
Not completed00000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDays Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)

Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation. A ventilator-free day is a calendar day during which the participant is alive and the endotracheal tube is absent for 24 continuous hours. For participants with a tracheostomy, unassisted breathing is considered ventilator-free; assisted ventilation is not.

Time frame:
Through Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Days Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)
DaysBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Days Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)10.5 ± 5.510.7 ± 5.6
SecondaryDays Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)

Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant is alive, without delirium, and coma-free for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day.

Time frame:
Through Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Days Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)
DaysBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Days Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)10.9 ± 6.110.7 ± 6.2
SecondaryDays Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)

Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant was alive and coma-free for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day. Coma-free days are defined as days when all documented sedation scores are above the following thresholds: State Behavioral Scale (SBS) ≥ -1, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≥ -3, or COMFORT-B ≥ 10, as applicable. Days following PICU discharge through Day 21 are considered alive and coma-free unless the participant is deceased.

Time frame:
Through Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Days Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)
DaysBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Days Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)16.4 ± 5.216.5 ± 5.2
SecondaryDays Alive

Number of days through Day 21 during which the participant was alive for 24 continuous hours during a calendar day. Days following PICU discharge through Day 21 are considered days alive unless the participant is deceased. Participants withdrawn due to limitation of care orders or brain death evaluation are considered deceased on the day death is pronounced.

Time frame:
Through Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Days Alive
DaysBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Days Alive20.7 ± 1.820.6 ± 2.3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21

The Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) is a 6-point scale of cerebral functional status: 1 = normal, 2 = mild disability, 3 = moderate disability, 4 = severe disability, 5 = coma or vegetative state, and 6 = death. This outcome reports the number of participants with normal cerebral performance, defined as a PCPC score of 1, at the earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21

Time frame:
Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21
ParticipantsBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21371383
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21

The Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) is a 6-point scale of overall functional status: 1 = normal/good overall performance, 2 = mild disability, 3 = moderate disability, 4 = severe disability, 5 = coma or vegetative state, and 6 = death. This outcome reports the number of participants with normal overall performance, defined as a POPC score of 1, at the earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21.

Time frame:
Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21
ParticipantsBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Number of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21302313
SecondaryFunctional Status Scale (FSS) Category at Patient Discharge

The Functional Status Scale (FSS) assesses six domains of pediatric function: mental status, sensory functioning, communication, motor functioning, feeding, and respiratory status. Each domain is scored from 1 (normal) to 5 (very severe dysfunction), producing a total score from 6 to 30, with lower scores indicating better functional status. Participants were categorized according to their FSS score at discharge.

Time frame:
At patient discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Functional Status Scale (FSS) Category at Patient Discharge
ParticipantsBaseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementation
Normal/Good (Score 6-7)160147
Mild/Moderate Dysfunction (Score 8-15)433433
Severe/Very Severe Dysfunction (Score 16-30)141112

Adverse events

Collected over From PICU admission through PICU discharge or Day 21, whichever occurred first.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual PICU Care18/752 (2.4%)——
PICU Up! Post-Implementation23/718 (3.2%)2/718 (0.3%)39/718 (5.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventUsual PICU CarePICU Up! Post-Implementation
Accidental endotracheal tube dislodgement with hypoxic cardiac arrestInjury, poisoning and procedural complications—1/718
Accidental endotracheal tube dislodgementInjury, poisoning and procedural complications—1/718
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventUsual PICU CarePICU Up! Post-Implementation
ReintubationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications—39/718

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
0-2 years426373799
3-6 years100106206
7-12 years94105199
13-18 years111115226
>18 years211940
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
Female327301628
Male425417842
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native6511
Asian292251
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander033
Black or African American134141275
White477462939
More than one race141327
Unknown or Not Reported9272164
Baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category, Normal
Baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category, Normal(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
Count of participants5055231028
Baseline Pediatric Overall Performance Category, Normal
Baseline Pediatric Overall Performance Category, Normal(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
Count of participants476485961
Baseline Functional Status Scale, Normal
Baseline Functional Status Scale, Normal(Participants)Baseline/Pre-implementationIntervention/Post-implementationTotal
Count of participants5124961008
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Valley Children's Hospital
    Madera, California 93636, United States
  • Nemours Children's Hospital of the Nemours Foundation
    Orlando, Florida 32827, United States
  • Norton Children's Hospital: University of Louisville
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Hennepin Healthcare: University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, United States
  • Children's Hospital at Dartmouth: Geisel School of Medicine
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • UNC Children's: University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • Janet Weis Children's Hospital: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine
    Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital: Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • West Virginia University Medicine Children's: West Virginia University
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin: Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wieczorek B, Ascenzi J, Kim Y, Lenker H, Potter C, Shata NJ, Mitchell L, Haut C, Berkowitz I, Pidcock F, Hoch J, Malamed C, Kravitz T, Kudchadkar SR. PICU Up!: Impact of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Promote Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):e559-e566. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000983. PubMed 27759596 ↗
  • Patel RV, Redivo J, Nelliot A, Eakin MN, Wieczorek B, Quinn J, Gurses AP, Balas MC, Needham DM, Kudchadkar SR. Early Mobilization in a PICU: A Qualitative Sustainability Analysis of PICU Up! Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 1;22(4):e233-e242. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002619. PubMed 33315754 ↗
  • Kudchadkar SR, Nelliot A, Awojoodu R, Vaidya D, Traube C, Walker T, Needham DM; Prevalence of Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU (PARK-PICU) Investigators and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network. Physical Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Point Prevalence Study in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):634-644. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004291. PubMed 32168030 ↗
  • Choong K, Canci F, Clark H, Hopkins RO, Kudchadkar SR, Lati J, Morrow B, Neu C, Wieczorek B, Zebuhr C. Practice Recommendations for Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Children. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2018 Mar;7(1):14-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601424. Epub 2017 Apr 10. PubMed 31073462 ↗
  • Traube C, Silver G, Reeder RW, Doyle H, Hegel E, Wolfe HA, Schneller C, Chung MG, Dervan LA, DiGennaro JL, Buttram SD, Kudchadkar SR, Madden K, Hartman ME, deAlmeida ML, Walson K, Ista E, Baarslag MA, Salonia R, Beca J, Long D, Kawai Y, Cheifetz IM, Gelvez J, Truemper EJ, Smith RL, Peters ME, O'Meara AM, Murphy S, Bokhary A, Greenwald BM, Bell MJ. Delirium in Critically Ill Children: An International Point Prevalence Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002250. PubMed 28079605 ↗
  • Walker TC, Kudchadkar SR. Early mobilization in the pediatric intensive care unit. Transl Pediatr. 2018 Oct;7(4):308-313. doi: 10.21037/tp.2018.09.02. PubMed 30460183 ↗
  • Hopkins RO, Choong K, Zebuhr CA, Kudchadkar SR. Transforming PICU Culture to Facilitate Early Rehabilitation. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;4(4):204-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563547. PubMed 27134761 ↗
  • Ista E, Scholefield BR, Manning JC, Harth I, Gawronski O, Bartkowska-Sniatkowska A, Ramelet AS, Kudchadkar SR; EU PARK-PICU Collaborators. Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU). Crit Care. 2020 Jun 24;24(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2. PubMed 32576273 ↗
  • Wieczorek B, Burke C, Al-Harbi A, Kudchadkar SR. Early mobilization in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015;2015(4):129-170. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563386. Epub 2015 Sep 3. PubMed 26380147 ↗
  • Flaigle MC, Ascenzi J, Kudchadkar SR. Identifying Barriers to Delirium Screening and Prevention in the Pediatric ICU: Evaluation of PICU Staff Knowledge. J Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PubMed 26362671 ↗
  • Kudchadkar SR, Aljohani O, Johns J, Leroux A, Alsafi E, Jastaniah E, Gottschalk A, Shata NJ, Al-Harbi A, Gergen D, Nadkarni A, Crainiceanu C. Day-Night Activity in Hospitalized Children after Major Surgery: An Analysis of 2271 Hospital Days. J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;209:190-197.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.01.054. Epub 2019 Mar 15. PubMed 30885646 ↗
  • Miura S, Wieczorek B, Lenker H, Kudchadkar SR. Normal Baseline Function Is Associated With Delayed Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):405-410. doi: 10.1177/0885066618754507. Epub 2018 Jan 22. PubMed 29357778 ↗
  • Choong K, Zorko DJ, Awojoodu R, Ducharme-Crevier L, Fontela PS, Lee LA, Guerguerian AM, Garcia Guerra G, Krmpotic K, McKelvie B, Menon K, Murthy S, Sehgal A, Weiss MJ, Kudchadkar SR. Prevalence of Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU: A Canadian Multicenter Point Prevalence Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):181-193. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002601. PubMed 33116069 ↗
  • Kudchadkar SR, Yaster M, Punjabi NM. Sedation, sleep promotion, and delirium screening practices in the care of mechanically ventilated children: a wake-up call for the pediatric critical care community*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1592-600. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000326. PubMed 24717461 ↗
  • Ghafoor S, Fan K, Williams S, Brown A, Bowman S, Pettit KL, Gorantla S, Quillivan R, Schwartzberg S, Curry A, Parkhurst L, James M, Smith J, Canavera K, Elliott A, Frett M, Trone D, Butrum-Sullivan J, Barger C, Lorino M, Mazur J, Dodson M, Melancon M, Hall LA, Rains J, Avent Y, Burlison J, Wang F, Pan H, Lenk MA, Morrison RR, Kudchadkar SR. Beginning Restorative Activities Very Early: Implementation of an Early Mobility Initiative in a Pediatric Onco-Critical Care Unit. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 8;11:645716. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.645716. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33763377 ↗
  • Denlinger K, Young DL, Beier M, Friedman M, Quinn J, Hoyer EH, Kudchadkar SR. Psychometric Testing of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) in the Pediatric Acute Care Setting. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 1;33(3):149-154. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000807. PubMed 34086622 ↗
  • Fayed N, Cameron S, Fraser D, Cameron JI, Al-Harbi S, Simpson R, Wakim M, Chiu L, Choong K. Priority Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Patient and Parent Perspective. Am J Crit Care. 2020 Sep 1;29(5):e94-e103. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020188. PubMed 32869071 ↗
  • Treble-Barna A, Beers SR, Houtrow AJ, Ortiz-Aguayo R, Valenta C, Stanger M, Chrisman M, Orringer M, Smith CM, Pollon D, Duffett M, Choong K, Watson RS, Kochanek PM, Fink EL; PICU-Rehabilitation Study Group, Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network, and Prevalence of Acute critical Neurological disease in children: A Global Epidemiological Assessment (PANGEA) Investigators. PICU-Based Rehabilitation and Outcomes Assessment: A Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Physicians. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):e274-e282. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001940. PubMed 30946294 ↗
  • Merritt C, Menon K, Agus MSD, Choong K, McNally D, O'Hearn K, Watson RS, Wong HR, Duffett M, Wypij D, Zimmerman JJ. Beyond Survival: Pediatric Critical Care Interventional Trial Outcome Measure Preferences of Families and Healthcare Professionals. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;19(2):e105-e111. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001409. PubMed 29394234 ↗
  • Choong K, Fraser D, Al-Harbi S, Borham A, Cameron J, Cameron S, Cheng J, Clark H, Doherty T, Fayed N, Gorter JW, Herridge M, Khetani M, Menon K, Seabrook J, Simpson R, Thabane L. Functional Recovery in Critically Ill Children, the "WeeCover" Multicenter Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;19(2):145-154. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001421. PubMed 29394221 ↗
  • Ames SG, Alessi LJ, Chrisman M, Stanger M, Corboy D, Sinha A, Fink EL. Development and Implementation of Pediatric ICU-based Mobility Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 May 19;6(3):e414. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000414. eCollection 2021 May-Jun. PubMed 34046543 ↗
  • Betters KA, Hebbar KB, Farthing D, Griego B, Easley T, Turman H, Perrino L, Sparacino S, deAlmeida ML. Development and implementation of an early mobility program for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9. PubMed 28821360 ↗
  • Azamfirei R, Mennie C, Dinglas VD, Fatima A, Colantuoni E, Gurses AP, Balas MC, Needham DM, Kudchadkar SR; on behalf of the PICU Up! Investigators. Impact of a multifaceted early mobility intervention for critically ill children - the PICU Up! trial: study protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Mar 15;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07206-2. PubMed 36918956 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data generated in this grant will be presented in a timely fashion at national and international meetings and in publications. All final peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from this proposal will be submitted to the digital archive PubMed Central. The investigators plan to share data from this research with other researchers who have interests in improving outcomes in critically ill children through early and progressive mobility interventions. Written proposals for data sharing requests will be accepted and reviewed by an independent review committee to ensure the proposal is scientifically and methodologically sound and not duplicative with other analyses. If approved, data sharing would occur after establishing a data use agreement with institutional signing authorities of each institution. Medical record and outcomes data will then be made available in the form of deidentified datasets with no identifiers in keeping with NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2022 to primary completion in Aug 2025, 36 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2026, 1 year 1 month after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Aug 2026.

Of 399 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Critical Illness, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40. This study's 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 403 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40.

Critical Illness covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

Completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Aug 2025, on Oct 1, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 26, 2021
First posted
Aug 4, 2021
StartActual
Aug 8, 2022
Primary completionActual
Aug 11, 2025
CompletionActual
Aug 11, 2025was Sep 2026
Results delay requested
Aug 10, 2026
Results first posted
Oct 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 1, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Oct 1, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2026→Aug 11, 2025 (actual)
Oct 1, 2026
Enrollment
1440 (estimated)→1470 (actual)
Oct 1, 2026
Eligibility
Maximum age 18 Years→none
Oct 1, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore Duration of Mechanical VentilationNow Days Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)Time frame: Through Day 21
Oct 1, 2026
Documents
Secondary outcomes
6 added, 14 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedDays Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)Time frame: Through Day 21
  • AddedDays Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)Time frame: Through Day 21
  • AddedDays AliveTime frame: Through Day 21
  • AddedNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
  • AddedNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
  • AddedFunctional Status Scale (FSS) Category at Patient DischargeTime frame: At patient discharge
  • RemovedProportion of Days with DeliriumTime frame: Through Day 21
  • RemovedChange in Functional Status as assessed by the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scaleTime frame: Through Day 21
  • RemovedChange in Functional Status as assessed by the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) scaleTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomePICU length of stayTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients PICU mortalityTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to homeTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to inpatient floorTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitationTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to other hospitalTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with new pressure injuriesTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with physical therapy consultationTime frame: Day 3
  • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with occupational therapy consultationTime frame: Day 3
  • Removedother outcomeMean daily Opioid exposureTime frame: Through Day 21
  • Removedother outcomeMean daily Benzodiazepine exposureTime frame: Through Day 21
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Results posted
    Study completion Sep 30, 2026→Aug 11, 2025 (now actual)
    Enrollment 1440 (estimated)→1470 (actual)
    Eligibility Maximum age 18 Years→none
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore Duration of Mechanical VentilationNow Days Alive and Ventilator-Free (AVF)Time frame: Through Day 21
    Secondary outcomes 6 added, 14 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedDays Alive and Delirium- and Coma-Free (ADCF)Time frame: Through Day 21
    • AddedDays Alive and Coma-Free (ACF)Time frame: Through Day 21
    • AddedDays AliveTime frame: Through Day 21
    • AddedNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
    • AddedNumber of Participants With Normal Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) at PICU Discharge or Day 21Time frame: Earlier of PICU discharge or Day 21
    • AddedFunctional Status Scale (FSS) Category at Patient DischargeTime frame: At patient discharge
    • RemovedProportion of Days with DeliriumTime frame: Through Day 21
    • RemovedChange in Functional Status as assessed by the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scaleTime frame: Through Day 21
    • RemovedChange in Functional Status as assessed by the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) scaleTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomePICU length of stayTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients PICU mortalityTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to homeTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to inpatient floorTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitationTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomeNumber of patients discharged to other hospitalTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with new pressure injuriesTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with physical therapy consultationTime frame: Day 3
    • Removedother outcomePercentage of patients with occupational therapy consultationTime frame: Day 3
    • Removedother outcomeMean daily Opioid exposureTime frame: Through Day 21
    • Removedother outcomeMean daily Benzodiazepine exposureTime frame: Through Day 21
    + 5 other changes: verification date, description, design details, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04989790
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2021
Start date
Aug 8, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 11, 2025
Completion
Aug 11, 2025
Results posted
Oct 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Sapna Kudchadkar, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion