ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04982211Updated Jul 29, 2021

Comparing Standard vs. Modified Reconsolidation Blockade for the Treatment of Psychological Trauma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Propranolol and Placebo in Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder, sponsored by Douglas Mental Health University Institute. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-29.

Sponsored by Douglas Mental Health University Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to examine a mismatch-based method of reconsolidation blockade for the treatment of psychological trauma in military personnel and Federal police officers. The standard reconsolidation blockade treatment (aka Reconsolidation Therapy) involves reactivating the trauma memory while under the influence of propranolol. The mismatch method of Reconsolidation Therapy will involve varying the contexts in which the weekly trauma memory retrieval will occur. This study will involve 10 visits (eligibility assessment, treatments, and follow-up visits) over a 6-month period for each participant. Treatments will be conducted once a week for a six-week period where the participant will take a dose of propranolol (or a placebo pill) 60 minutes prior to memory reactivation. The investigators hypothesize that reconsolidation blockade treatment will be as effective in treating PTSD among military personnel and Federal police officers, with the mismatch condition showing greater symptom improvement.

Read the detailed description

Traumatic stress remains a treatment-refractory mental health problem characterized by symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance, negative cognitions and affect, and hyperarousal. Due to the nature of their profession, military personnel and the Federal police officers (RCMP; Royal Canadian Mounted Police) are at a greater risk of suffering from traumatic stress. Thus, there is an important unmet need for developing novel treatments for trauma-related disorders, particularly for the military and RCMP.

Considering the pivotal role of negative emotional experiences in the development and persistence of PTSD, blocking the reconsolidation of such experiences opens the door to a novel and powerful treatment approach against this disorder. We (Brunet et al, 2018) have previously shown the efficacy of trauma memory reactivation performed under the influence of propranolol, a noradrenergic beta-receptor blocker, as a putative reconsolidation blocker, in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although this therapeutic method was shown to be efficacious, it is hypothesized that symptomatic improvements may be increased by including a mismatch experience between what is expected during memory recall and the actual recall experience, in line with mismatch theory (Pedreira et al, 2004; see Ecker, 2015). In this study, we test the effects of a mismatch procedure by altering the context in which the trauma memory retrieval occurs. Standard and mismatch reconsolidation therapy procedures will be used to treat PTSD in military personnel and Federal police officers.

Primary objective:

  • Compare the effects of Standard Reconsolidation Therapy using propranolol vs. placebo on PTSD symptoms one-week post-treatment.

Primary hypothesis:

It is predicted that propranolol administration will yield greater PTSD symptom improvement than placebo at one week following the last treatment visit.

Secondary objectives:

  • Compare the effect of Standard vs. Mismatch Reconsolidation Treatment conditions on PTSD symptoms using propranolol during treatment, one-week post-treatment and at six months;
  • Determine whether Reconsolidation Therapy with propranolol is associated with greater PTSD symptom reductions than placebo during treatment and at six months;
  • Examine the proportion of participants rated as 'improved' based on a global clinical impression rating scale across treatment conditions;
  • Examine the proportion of participants who no longer meet PTSD diagnostic criteria at one-week post-treatment and follow-up according to treatment condition;
  • Explore the effect of the treatment on depressive symptoms, dissociative symptoms, complex PTSD symptomatology, and quality of life;
  • Examine the effect of treatment condition on drop-outs and relapse rates;

Procedures

To accomplish the study objectives, the investigators will employ a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and use standardized, repeated dependent measures of change at each treatment visit, as well as at one-week, 3-month and 6-month post-treatment visits). At each treatment session, participants will be asked recall their traumatic memory with the help of a trauma narrative under the influence of propranolol or a placebo. Recall will occur using a standard reconsolidation or mismatch protocol. Four treatment conditions will be defined, as follows:

  • Group 1: Standard trauma memory reactivation + propranolol;
  • Group 2: Standard trauma reactivation + placebo;
  • Group 3: Modified trauma reactivation + propranolol;
  • Group 4: Modified trauma reactivation + placebo.

As a means to favor recruitment, the current study will use an unbalanced sampling design. We will randomize 50 participants per cell in each of two active treatment groups and 25 participants per cell in the two placebo groups. Approximately 4 sites will be involved in recruiting participants for the study: one in the US, with the remaining sites in Canada. We are targeting 150 study participants with the aim of obtaining 121 treatment completers, taking into account an approximate 20% attrition rate.

The protocol will involve 10 study visits over a 6-month period. The first two visits will serve to obtain consent, establish the PTSD diagnosis, and determine eligibility. Treatments will occur once a week for 6 weeks. The standard reconsolidation therapy procedure will involve having participants write or read a summary of their traumatic experience under the influence of propranolol. The mismatch reconsolidation therapy condition will involve changing the way the trauma narrative is used to reactivate the trauma memory at each visit . Participants will not be informed in advance of the mismatch procedures. Follow-up assessments for all participants will be conducted one week post-treatment, as well as at three- and six-months after study entry.

Statistical Analyses. It is hypothesized that both standard and mismatch therapy conditions under propranolol will show greater improvements than with placebo. However, it is the mismatch therapy condition using propranolol is expected to yield significantly greater improvements in PTSD symptoms relative to the other three conditions. All data will be tested using mixed effects statistical models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Acute Stress Disorder
  • Adjustment Disorders

Keywords

  • Memory Reconsolidation
  • Propranolol
  • Military personnel
  • Veterans
  • Mismatch
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 74 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders.

Browse Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Douglas Mental Health University Institute is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(i) Male or female 18-65 years old;

(ii) Individuals who are either:

  • Employed full-time as part of the Canadian or US military forces or the RCMP;
  • On leave of absence from Canadian or US military forces, or the RCMP;
  • Veterans of the Canadian or US military forces or the RCMP;

(iii) Evidence of a personally signed and dated form;

(iv) Individuals suffering from occupationally related PTSD, as defined by the , for 6 consecutive months or more.

(v) Females of willing to use for the duration of the treatment period of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) Basal systolic blood pressure \< 100 mm Hg;

(ii) Basal heart rate \< 50 BPM;

(iii) Medical conditions contraindicating the administration of propranolol or beta blockers

(iv) A known to propranolol or any of the study product or placebo ingredients;

(v) lactose intolerance;

(vi) Use of medication that involves unwanted interactions with propranolol including but not limited to other beta-blockers, anti-arrhythmic medications, and calcium channel blockers;

(vii) Current use of propranolol;

(viii) Pregnant or breast-feeding women;

(ix) Individuals with borderline personality, bipolar disorder, psychosis;

(x) Current substance dependence;

(xi) Active suicidal ideations, as demonstrated by a response of 2 or 3 on item 7 of the Beck Depression Inventory - Short Form;

(xii) A score below 'moderately ill' on the severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression scale;

(xiii) Participating in active litigation related to the traumatic event (Veterans Affairs Canada claims are permitted, excluding judicial claims);

(xiv) Strong dissociative tendencies, as evidenced by the Dissociative Experience Scale (8-item version, DES-T);

(xv) Suspected or confirmed traumatic brain injury during the last 24 months;

(xvi) Understanding neither English nor French;

(xvii) Participants who receive exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy during the treatment phase of the study;

(xviii) Presence of any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Propranolol and standard trauma memory reactivation group

    Oral propranolol will be administered 60 minutes prior to writing (Treatment 1) or reading aloud a trauma narrative.

    Drug: Propranolol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo and standard trauma memory reactivation group

    Oral placebo will be administered 60 minutes prior to writing (Treatment 1) or reading aloud a trauma narrative.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Propranolol and mismatch trauma memory reactivation group

    Oral propranolol will be administered 60 minutes prior to a memory reactivation procedure involving variations in the contexts where the trauma memory reactivations occur.

    Drug: Propranolol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo and mismatch trauma memory reactivation group

    Oral placebo will be administered 60 minutes prior to a memory reactivation procedure involving variations in the contexts where the trauma memory reactivations occur.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Oral propranolol hydrochloride capsules, dosed per participant weight

    Also known as: Teva propranolol

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral placebo capsules, dosed per participant weight

    Also known as: Placebo capsules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-traumatic Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders - 5th edition (PCL-5) scores

    Change from baseline (week 0) to week 7 in PCL-5 scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0 and 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-traumatic Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders - 5th edition (PCL-5) scores

    Changes from baseline in PCL-5 scores during treatment and at weeks 13 and 26

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13 and 26

  2. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores

    Changes from baseline in BDI scores during treatment and at week 26

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 6, 7, 13 and 26

  3. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores

    Absolute CGI-I scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 7 and 26

  4. Mini Psychiatric Interview, version 7 (MINI-7)

    Proportion of participants who no longer meet PTSD diagnostic criteria at Weeks 7 and 26.

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 7 and 26

  5. Social Functioning Questionnaire (QFS)

    Changes from baseline in QFS scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 7, and 26

  6. World Health Organization - Quality of Life BREF

    Changes from baseline in World Health Organization - Quality of Life BREF scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at weeks 0, 7, and 26

  7. Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-T)

    Changes from baseline in DES-T scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at week 0.

  8. International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)

    Changes from baseline in ITQ scores

    Time frame: Questionnaire administered at baseline and weeks 0, 7, and 26

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute
    Montréal, Quebec H4H1R3, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brunet A, Saumier D, Liu A, Streiner DL, Tremblay J, Pitman RK. Reduction of PTSD Symptoms With Pre-Reactivation Propranolol Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;175(5):427-433. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050481. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PubMed 29325446 ↗
  • Ecker B. Memory reconsolidation understood and misunderstood. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy. 2015; 3(1): 2-46.
  • Cheymol G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs in obesity. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Aug;25(2):103-14. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199325020-00003. PubMed 8403734 ↗
  • Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M. Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced amnesia for learned fear. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):830-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1231357. PubMed 23413355 ↗
  • Bradley R, Greene J, Russ E, Dutra L, Westen D. A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;162(2):214-27. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.214. Erratum In: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;162(4):832. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;163(2):330. PubMed 15677582 ↗
  • Fliess JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley,1986.
  • Desmeules J. Interations médicamenteuses et cytochromes P450. Pharma-Flash, 2002. 29(4): 13-16.
  • Mackinnon A. The use and reporting of multiple imputation in medical research - a review. J Intern Med. 2010 Dec;268(6):586-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02274.x. Epub 2010 Sep 10. PubMed 20831627 ↗
  • Benjamini, Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.1995; Series B (Methodological): 289-300.
  • Pedreira ME, Perez-Cuesta LM, Maldonado H. Mismatch between what is expected and what actually occurs triggers memory reconsolidation or extinction. Learn Mem. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):579-85. doi: 10.1101/lm.76904. PubMed 15466312 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04982211
Lead sponsor
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Alain Brunet, Ph.D. (Primary Investigator and Full Professor, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University., Douglas Mental Health University Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2021

Study contacts

Alain Brunet, Ph.D.
Contact
alain.brunet@mcgill.ca
514-761-6131 ext. 4348
Daniel Saumier, Ph.D.
Contact
saumierd@gmail.com
514-761-6131 ext. 4349
Alain Brunet, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Douglas Mental Health University Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Propranolol

Start the discussion