ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07428460TMSNSUpdated Aug 20, 2026

Accelerated Neuromodulation Therapy for Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

An interventional study of Neuronavigated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and BEAM-F3 Intermittent theta burst stimulation in Schizophrenia and Predominant Negative Symptoms, sponsored by Douglas Mental Health University Institute. Recruiting at 3 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by Douglas Mental Health University Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an accelerated form of neuromodulation therapy can help improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms can include low motivation, reduced emotional expression, and difficulty with social interaction. The study will also look at how safe and tolerable this treatment is when given over a short period of time.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active neuromodulation therapy or sham (placebo) stimulation. The study will also compare two different ways of choosing where to place the stimulation.

The investigators want to learn whether this accelerated treatment approach is safe and feasible for people with schizophrenia, whether negative symptoms improve after treatment, and whether the way the stimulation site is chosen affects outcomes

Participants will be asked to complete clinical interviews and questionnaires, undergo a brain scan, receive neuromodulation therapy or sham stimulation over five consecutive days, and attend follow-up visits after treatment

This study is being conducted at three hospitals in Canada and is designed to help plan larger studies in the future.

Read the detailed description

Negative symptoms of schizophrenia, including diminished motivation, reduced emotional expression, and impaired social functioning, are a major contributor to long-term disability and remain inadequately treated by existing interventions. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has demonstrated potential benefit for negative symptoms, but conventional treatment schedules often require multiple weeks of daily sessions, which may limit feasibility in this population.

Accelerated neuromodulation therapy delivers multiple stimulation sessions per day over a condensed time period and may improve accessibility, adherence, and tolerability. This pilot study evaluates an accelerated iTBS protocol delivered over five consecutive days in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who exhibit clinically significant negative symptoms.

Participants are randomized to receive either active neuromodulation therapy or sham stimulation. In addition, the study evaluates two approaches to stimulation targeting. Targeting approach is assigned according to study procedures designed to preserve participant and rater blinding.

All participants undergo baseline clinical, behavioral, and functional assessments, followed by the accelerated treatment protocol and post-treatment follow-up assessments. Primary outcomes focus on changes in negative symptom severity, while secondary outcomes assess depressive symptoms, functional outcomes, and task-based behavioral measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia and Predominant Negative Symptoms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Negative symptoms
  • Neuromodulation therapy
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation
  • Accelerated treatment
  • Schizophrenia spectrum disorders
  • TMS
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Outpatient treatment
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,563 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 491 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 71 across 2,944 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Douglas Mental Health University Institute is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder
  • Duration of illness ≥ 6 months
  • negative symptoms
  • Must have been on a stable pharmacological treatment for at least 4 weeks before entering the study
  • Clinicians will confirm that patients' negative and positive symptoms have been stable per their clinical opinion for at least 3 months.
  • Participants must be able to provide
  • Ability to undergo MRI scanning

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, lactation, or an intrauterine device
  • History of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the past 6 months
  • Use of licit or illicit substances (excluding cannabis) during the week of treatment and in the 24 hours prior to fMRI scans
  • for TMS
  • Previous treatment with rTMS
  • Documented history of significant intellectual disability
  • Primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder secondary to a medical condition or substance-induced psychosis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active iTBS (Neuronavigated Targeting)

    Participants receive iTBS over five consecutive days (ten sessions/day) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using neuronavigation-guided targeting.

    Device: Neuronavigated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

  • Experimental
    Active iTBS (BEAM-F3 Targeting)

    Participants receive iTBS over five consecutive days (ten sessions/day) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using BEAM-F3 targeting.

    Device: BEAM-F3 Intermittent theta burst stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham iTBS

    Participants receive sham iTBS over five consecutive days (ten sessions/day) using the same session structure and procedures as active treatment.

    Device: Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceNeuronavigated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Neuronavigated intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is delivered using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device with a figure-of-eight coil targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Individualized stimulation targets are identified using functional MRI data and are imported into a neuronavigation system to guide coil positioning and orientation throughout treatment. Treatment is delivered over five consecutive days using an accelerated schedule consisting of ten stimulation sessions per day. Each iTBS session is delivered at an intensity corresponding to 110% of the participant's resting motor threshold, with stimulation intensity adjusted for individual cortical depth.

  • DeviceBEAM-F3 Intermittent theta burst stimulation

    BEAM-F3 intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is delivered using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device with a figure-of-eight coil targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Stimulation targets are identified according to the BEAM-F3 procedure. Treatment is delivered over five consecutive days using an accelerated schedule consisting of ten stimulation sessions per day. Each iTBS session is delivered at an intensity corresponding to 110% of the participant's resting motor threshold, with stimulation intensity adjusted for individual cortical depth.

  • DeviceSham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation is delivered using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device with a figure-of-eight coil positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Coil placement, session structure, and treatment schedule are identical to those used for active stimulation. Treatment is delivered over five consecutive days using an accelerated schedule consisting of ten stimulation sessions per day. Sham stimulation is administered using procedures designed to mimic the experience of active iTBS without producing therapeutic cortical stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Avolition/Apathy Subscale Score

    Change in score on the Avolition/Apathy subscale of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). The SANS Avolition/Apathy subscale ranges from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater negative symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  2. Change in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms Total Score

    Change in total score on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Total scores range from 0 to 125, with higher scores indicating greater negative symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  3. Change in Brief Negative Symptom Scale Total Score

    Change in total score on the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Total scores range from 0 to 78, with higher scores indicating greater negative symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  4. Effect of Targeting Method on Negative Symptoms

    Difference in change in negative symptom severity between targeting methods, as measured by negative symptom outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Affective Processing

    Change in affective processing as measured by performance on a behavioural task assessing conditioned hallucinations related to valenced auditory information.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  2. Change in Social Appraisal

    Change in social appraisal and belief updating as measured by performance on a behavioral task assessing social inference and valuation.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  3. Change in Cognitive Performance

    Change in cognitive performance as measured by an automated cognitive battery assessing attention, processing speed, working memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency, and executive function.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  4. Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Score

    Change in score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  5. Change in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia Score

    Change in score on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

  6. Change in Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale Score

    Change in score on the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal
    Montreal, Quebec H1N 3M5, Canada
    Not yet recruiting
  • Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec - Centre de recherche CERVO
    Québec, Quebec G1J 2G3, Canada
    Not yet recruiting
    • Olivier Roy Roy, MD, MSc, PhD, FRCPC · Contactolivier.roy@cervo.ulaval.ca · 418-663-5000
    • Olivier Roy, MD, MSc, PhD, FRCPC · Principal investigator
  • McGill Lab for Computational Psychiatry and Translation - Burland Pavilion 6875 Boulevard LaSalle Montreal, QC
    Verdun, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07428460
Lead sponsor
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Collaborators
Centre de recherche CERVO, Magnus Medical, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de Montréal
Responsible party
David Benrimoh (NeuroPsychiatrist, Douglas Mental Health University Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Ashley S. Choucroun
Contact
ashley.choucroun.comtl@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
5146593488
David Benrimoh, MD.CM., MSc., MSc., FRCPC
principal investigator · McGill University, Department of Psychiatry
Olivier Roy, MD
principal investigator · Centre de recherche CERVO - Université Laval
Stéphane Potvin, PhD
principal investigator · Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal
Lena Palaniyappan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Douglas Mental Health Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion