CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04972955PREDISPOSEUpdated Aug 3, 2025

Predicting Dysglycemia in Individuals With Gestational Diabetes Immediately Postpartum Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring

An observational study in Gestational Diabetes, Prediabetes; Complicating Pregnancy and Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by University of Manitoba. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-03.

Sponsored by University of Manitoba · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Gestational diabetes is one of the most common medical disorders in pregnancy and is a major risk factor for the postpartum development of dysglycemia. Despite the high risk of developing dysglycemia, 50-80% of women with gestational diabetes are not receiving testing within a year postpartum. The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study to examine the use of continuous glucose monitoring immediately postpartum to estimate the risk of maternal dysglycemia postpartum.

Read the detailed description

Gestational diabetes is one of the most common medical disorders in pregnancy and affects up to 18% of pregnancies. It is associated with an increased risk of both maternal and neonatal complications. Importantly, gestational diabetes is a major risk factor for the postpartum development of pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes (together referred to as dysglycemia). Specifically, half of people with gestational diabetes will develop dysglycemia within 10 years of delivery. Despite the high risk of developing dysglycemia, 50-80% of women with recent gestational diabetes are not receiving testing within a year postpartum.

There are likely many factors contributing to this low screening rate. These include individual factors such as socioeconomic status and maternal age, as well as the nature of the guideline recommended test itself. The Diabetes Canada 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend screening for maternal dysglycemia between "6 weeks to 6 months postpartum" with a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This recommendation is based on expert opinion. While the 75g OGTT is thought to be the "gold-standard" for screening for dysglycemia postpartum, it has many pitfalls. First, the OGTT is widely disliked by women as it is time consuming and inconvenient. It requires consuming a sugary drink in addition to two separate venipunctures. Second, the 75g OGTT is notoriously unreproducible. Finally, it takes only a "snap shot" of a woman's glucose and insulin response with only two measurements over two-hours.

Emerging technologies are changing the landscape of diabetes care. Continuous glucose monitoring (Freestyle Libre 2) is one such technology. People easily insert a small cannula just under the skin using an applicator. While the device is in place, it measures interstitial glucose concentrations every 15 minutes. It is a small disc (\~size of a quarter) and it can be worn during typical daily activities such as sleeping, showering, and exercising. The sensor can store up to 8 hours of glucose readings in 15-minute intervals. People scan the sensor using a smartphone or reader to upload glucose readings to the Freestyle Libre 2 app, which can be viewed by a clinician and/or researcher. Continuous glucose monitoring gives a detailed picture of glycemic excursions throughout the day including both fasting and postprandial states.

There are currently no published studies examining the use of continuous glucose monitoring postpartum. Furthermore, no studies have examined continuous glucose monitoring's potential role in diagnosis of maternal dysglycemia postpartum. There is an unmet need to improve postpartum screening for individuals with gestational diabetes so that high risk individuals do not miss the opportunity for early treatment. To address this, the investigators will perform a study examining the use of continuous glucose monitoring immediately postpartum to estimate the risk of maternal dysglycemia postpartum. This is an observational study which aims to see if CGM can be used to diagnose diabetes. The CGM device in this study will be used for diagnosis and not as an intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gestational Diabetes
  • Prediabetes; Complicating Pregnancy
  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Pregnancy Related
  • Glucose Metabolism Disorders
  • Metabolic Disease
  • Endocrine System Diseases

Keywords

  • Gestational Diabetes
  • Pregnancy
  • Prediabetes
  • Prospective Cohort Study
  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • CGM
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Flash Glucose Monitoring
  • Screening
03

In context

Diabetes, Gestational

842 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes, Gestational; 198 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 240 is above the median of 200 across 269 observational studies indexed under Diabetes, Gestational.

Browse Diabetes, Gestational studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manitoba is the lead sponsor of 542 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

People who are currently pregnant and have been diagnosed with gestational diabetes during the current pregnancy

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant individuals age 18 and older
  • Diagnosed with gestational diabetes by the Diabetes Canada guidelines (including both the preferred or alternate testing approaches) or have an HbA1c of 6.0-6.4% during pregnancy
  • Have any of the following: have an elevated fasting glucose (≥ 5.3 mmol/L) on the diagnostic 75g OGTT in pregnancy; required insulin or metformin for treatment during pregnancy; body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25kg/m\^2, yes/no (\<27 weeks gestation BMI of ≥25 kg/m\^2 or ≥27 weeks gestation predicted BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m\^2 using (current weight in kg - 10kg)/height in meters\^2)
  • Planned in-hospital delivery
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Willingness to use the study device and complete assessments postpartum
  • Have access to email in order to complete participant questionnaire through REDCap

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of non-gestational diabetes (i.e., pre-existing type 1 or 2 diabetes) prior to or during pregnancy
  • Planned x-ray, MRI or CT within 3 weeks postpartum
  • Has an implantable medical device (ex. pacemaker)
  • On medications known to affect glucose metabolism (for example glucocorticoids, metformin etc.) while wearing the CGM postpartum
  • On medications which may interfere with the Freestyle Libre 2 accuracy (for example Vitamin C >1000mg/day) while wearing the CGM postpartum
  • Unable to speak and understand French or English
  • Unable to consent or declined informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes

    Pregnant individuals who have been diagnosed with gestational diabetes during the current pregnancy

    Device: Freestyle Libre 2

Interventions

  • DeviceFreestyle Libre 2

    Participants will wear a continuous glucose monitoring device, the Freestyle Libre 2, for two weeks following delivery.

  • DeviceFreestyle Libre 2

    Participants will wear a second continuous glucose monitoring device, the Freestyle Libre 2, for two weeks at 4-6 months postpartum and before their standard of care postpartum bloodwork after having gestational diabetes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The diagnostic accuracy of CGM as a screening test for postpartum dysglycemia.

    Diagnostic accuracy will be measured as sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio.

    Time frame: 1-14 days postpartum; 4-6 months postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. New diagnosis of maternal diabetes or prediabetes based on HbA1c alone, and a combination of the 75-gram OGTT and the HbA1c.

    Diabetes or prediabetes based on the postpartum 75-gram OGTT will be evaluated as fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or 2-hour plasma glucose of ≥11.1 mmol/L or fasting plasma glucose 6.1-6.9 mmol/L or 2-hour plasma glucose of 7.8-11.1 mmol/L, respectively. Diabetes or prediabetes based on the postpartum HbA1c will be evaluated as ≥6.5 and ≥6.0%, respectively. Diabetes and prediabetes will be analyzed separately and together.

    Time frame: 4-6 months postpartum

  2. Acceptability of CGM based on an acceptability questionnaires after device return and after final testing.

    The Acceptability Questionnaires for the Freestyle Libre 2 Postpartum will be completed at two points throughout the study. "Strongly agree/painless" and "agree/almost painless" will be considered as "rated favorably" in planned analyses.

    Time frame: 15-17 days postpartum; 4-6 months postpartum

  3. Dyslipidemia at time of postpartum bloodwork.

    Dyslipidemia is defined as abnormal levels of lipids in the bloodstream, which elevate cardiovascular risk. Lactation state will be recorded given impacts on lipid levels.

    Time frame: 4-6 months postpartum

  4. Glycemic variability reflected by coefficients of variation and standard deviations of blood glucose data.

    Blood glucose data will be collected using the Freestyle Libre 2 continuous glucose monitoring system.

    Time frame: 1-14 days postpartum; 4-6 months postpartum

  5. Cardiometabolic and related health outcomes diagnosed by regular healthcare team.

    Information on dysglycemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and additional health outcomes will be obtained through administrative provincial databases and chart review.

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 5 years postpartum

  6. Cost component analysis of CGM vs. 75g OGTT.

    Costs of assessing blood glucose via CGM versus lab-derived OGTT results will be compared.

    Time frame: 4-6 months to 5 years postpartum

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of Calgary
    Calgary, Alberta T2N1N4, Canada
  • University of Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E3P4, Canada
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T3L9, Canada
  • Universite Laval
    Québec, Quebec G1V4G2, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group; Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943. PubMed 18463375 ↗
  • Sellers EA, Dean HJ, Shafer LA, Martens PJ, Phillips-Beck W, Heaman M, Prior HJ, Dart AB, McGavock J, Morris M, Torshizi AA, Ludwig S, Shen GX. Exposure to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Impact on the Development of Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in Canadian First Nations and Non-First Nations Offspring. Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2240-2246. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1148. Epub 2016 Oct 4. PubMed 27703026 ↗
  • Lowe WL Jr, Scholtens DM, Lowe LP, Kuang A, Nodzenski M, Talbot O, Catalano PM, Linder B, Brickman WJ, Clayton P, Deerochanawong C, Hamilton J, Josefson JL, Lashley M, Lawrence JM, Lebenthal Y, Ma R, Maresh M, McCance D, Tam WH, Sacks DA, Dyer AR, Metzger BE; HAPO Follow-up Study Cooperative Research Group. Association of Gestational Diabetes With Maternal Disorders of Glucose Metabolism and Childhood Adiposity. JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):1005-1016. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11628. PubMed 30208453 ↗
  • Ferrara A, Peng T, Kim C. Trends in postpartum diabetes screening and subsequent diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus: A report from the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb;32(2):269-74. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1184. Epub 2008 Nov 4. PubMed 18984776 ↗
  • McGovern A, Butler L, Jones S, van Vlymen J, Sadek K, Munro N, Carr H, de Lusignan S. Diabetes screening after gestational diabetes in England: a quantitative retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e17-23. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676410. PubMed 24567578 ↗
  • Butalia S, Donovan L, Savu A, Johnson J, Edwards A, Kaul P. Postpartum Diabetes Testing Rates after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Canadian Women: A Population-Based Study. Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 May 12. PubMed 28506815 ↗
  • Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee; Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan L, Godbout A, Kader T, Keely E, Sanghera R. Diabetes and Pregnancy. Can J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;42 Suppl 1:S255-S282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.038. No abstract available. PubMed 29650105 ↗
  • Neiger R, Coustan DR. The role of repeat glucose tolerance tests in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90418-q. PubMed 1951534 ↗
  • Meltzer SJ, Snyder J, Penrod JR, Nudi M, Morin L. Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis: a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing costs of one-step and two-step methods. BJOG. 2010 Mar;117(4):407-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02475.x. Epub 2010 Jan 26. PubMed 20105163 ↗
  • Sigurdson SM, Bernier KJ, Donovan LE, Feig DS, Lemieux P, Pylypjuk C, Shen GX, Jiang D, Nerenberg K, Chrisp MM, Katz PM, Benham JL, Yamamoto JM. Predicting dysglycaemia in individuals with gestational diabetes immediately postpartum using continuous glucose monitoring (PREDISPOSE) in a multicentre prospective cohort study in Canada: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e103771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103771. PubMed 40738649 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04972955
Lead sponsor
University of Manitoba
Responsible party
Jennifer Yamamoto (MD, University of Manitoba) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2021
Start date
Jul 4, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 25, 2025
Completion
Dec 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer Yamamoto, MD
principal investigator · University of Manitoba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion