ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04944953Updated May 24, 2022

To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of "HG-102" With Botox® in the Improvement of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

A Phase 1 interventional study of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox] and Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102] in Glabellar Lines, sponsored by Hugel. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-24.

Sponsored by Hugel · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the safety and efficacy of "HG-102" with Botox® in the improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Read the detailed description

Double-blinded, Randomized, Active control, Single center-designed, Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy for improvement of Glabellar Lines of "HG-102" compared to Botox® in subjects with moderate to severe Glabellar Lines

02

Conditions studied

  • Glabellar Lines
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hugel is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged between 19 and 65 at screening visit.
  • Patients who voluntarily sign the .
  • Patients who can comply with the study procedures and visit schedule.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with infection, skin disorders, or scars at the glabellar region.
  • Patients with facial palsy or the symptoms of blepharoptosis.
  • Fertile women and men who have plans to conceive during pregnancy, breastfeeding and clinical trials or who do not agree to appropriate .
  • Subjects who are not eligible for this study based on investigator's judgement.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®)

    Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®) 100 Unit

    Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox]

  • Experimental
    Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102)

    Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102) 100 Unit

    Drug: Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102]

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence rates

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  2. Clinically-relevant changes in vital signs, physical exam, and laboratory testing assessed by medical personnel

    Time frame: 16 weeks (during the clinical trial)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating line severity

    Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown with Physician's rating line severity at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  2. Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with investigator's photo assessment

    Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown with investigator's photo assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  3. Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating line severity

    Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with Physician's rating line severity at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  4. Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with investigator's photo assessment

    Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with investigator's photo assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  5. Changes in grade by physician's rating line severity for glabellar lines

    Changes in grade(range from 0(None) to 3(Severe)) by physician's rating line severity for glabellar lines at each visit compared to baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  6. Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment

    Improvement rate of glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  7. Subject's satisfaction rate

    Subject's satisfaction rate of improvement in glabellar lines at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

  8. The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS)

    The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS) at immediately and about 30 minutes post injection (severity range is from 1(no pain) to 5(unbearable pain))

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea 05030, Korea, Republic of
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2021 to primary completion in Sep 2021, 2 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2021
First posted
Jun 30, 2021
StartActual
Jun 11, 2021
Primary completionActual
Sep 2, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 16, 2021
Last update
May 24, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04944953
Lead sponsor
Hugel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 30, 2021
Start date
Jun 11, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 2, 2021
Completion
Dec 16, 2021
Last update
May 24, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Botulinum toxin type A

Start the discussion