A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (Botulax®) and Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (BOTOX®, Bao Tuo Shi®) in Glabellar Lines, sponsored by Hugel. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-24.
Sponsored by Hugel · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is a phase 3 clinical trial of multi-center, random, blinded*, parallel control, and positive control to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Botulax® Injection compared to BOTOX® for improving moderate to severe glabellar wrinkles.
The case test of 500 qualified test subjects was conducted in 13 institutions nationwide in China. Those who meet all selection criteria and do not meet any of the exclusion criteria are selected as suitable test subjects. The selected test subjects are blinded and divided into the Botulax test group or the BOTOX test group.
Hugel is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (Botulax®)
Drug: Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (Botulax®)
Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (BOTOX®, Bao Tuo Shi®)
Drug: Botulinum Toxin A type for injection (BOTOX®, Bao Tuo Shi®)
Person in charge of dilution uses 0.9% sodium chloride injection solution to formulate the drug substance into 4U/0.1mL composite solution, and the investigator injects it into the test subjects
Person in charge of dilution uses 0.9% sodium chloride injection solution to formulate the drug substance into 4U/0.1mL composite solution, and the investigator injects it into the test subjects.
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating of line severity
The rate of test subjects receiving 0 or 1 point by the institution evaluator who assesses the glabellar wrinkles (at maximum frown) at the site in week 4.
Time frame: Week 4
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating of line severity
The rate of test subjects receiving 0 or 1 point by the institution evaluator who assesses the glabellar wrinkles (at maximum frown)at the site in weeks 1, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines at rest with Physician's assessment of severity
The rate of test subjects receiving 0 or 1 point by the institution evaluator who assesses the glabellar wrinkles (when at rest) at the site in weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines at maximum frown with investigator's photo assessment
The rate of test subjects receiving 0 or 1 point by the Independent Evaluation Committee based on the photo of the glabellar wrinkles (at maximum frown) in weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines at rest with investigator's photo assessment
The rate of test subjects receiving 0 or 1 point by the Independent Evaluation Committee based on the photo of the glabellar wrinkles (when at rest) in weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment
The rate of test subjects who self-assess that the treatment is effective (by giving a score of "+2" or higher) in weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Subject's satisfaction rate
The rate of test subjects who are satisfied with the treatment effect (test subject's satisfaction rating of 6 - 7) in weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2018, 8 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hugel