An interventional study of BRFS-18G-S100WH and MINT Lift FINE+ in Nasolabial Folds, sponsored by Hugel. Recruiting at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-22.
Sponsored by Hugel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 'BRFS-18G-S100WH' as Compared to 'MINT Lift FINE+' in Subject With Nasolabial Folds.
This clinical trial was conducted on patients who wanted to improve both nasolabial folds through facial tissue lifting using facial tissue fixing material 'BRFS-18G-S100WH' made of polydioxanone (PDO). Compared to 'MINT Lift FINE+', we want to confirm whether it has a non-inferior temporary wrinkle improvement effect and can be safely applied to the human body.
Hugel is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: BRFS-18G-S100WH
Device: MINT Lift FINE+
A facial tissue fixation material made of polydioxanone (PDO).
A facial tissue fixation material made of polydioxanone (PDO).
Improvement rate (%) at 12 weeks after the procedure compared to baseline.
Improvement rate (%) at 12 weeks after the procedure compared to baseline by an independent evaluator.
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
WSRS evaluation by an independent evaluator
Improvement rate (%): 4, 8, and 24 weeks after treatment. Baseline score change (points): 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure.
Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 24
WSRS evaluation by tester
Improvement rate (%): 4, 8, and 24 weeks after treatment. Baseline score change (points): 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure.
Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 24
Satisfaction level (%) at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure compared to the baseline.
Satisfaction level (%) at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure compared to the baseline by the subject
Time frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 24
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Feb 2024; primary completion for Jul 2025, 17 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hugel