CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04934163Updated May 10, 2024

Flow Rates of High-flow Nasal Cannula and Extubation Outcome

An interventional study of Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min) and Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min) in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-10.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula with a flow rate of 60 L/min versus 40 L/min after planned extubationon on a composite outcome of reintubation and use of NIV.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula with a flow rate of 60 L/min versus 40 L/min after planned extubationon on a composite outcome of reintubation and use of NIV in patients who are intubated for hypoxemic respiratory failure.

[Study Procedures] Set flow rates of HFNC The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) are set as 40 L/min and 60 L/min, respectively in the two trial groups. FiO2 was down-titrated to the minimal level to keep SO2 ≥ 92%. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs in the two groups. After that, the flow rate setting in both groups would be tapered to 30 L/min and would be kept for 12 hours. Then, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.

[Outcome Measures] To increase the statistical power of this pilot trial, we used a composite outcome of NIV use and or reintubation in 48 hours for the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include mortality of different time points, physiological parameters(respiratory rate, heart rate), ventilation/oxygenation data(PaO2/FiO2 ratio, pH) and patient comfort. Exploratory endpoints include comparison between different flow rate settings.

[Primary endpoint] We hypothesized that higher flow setting of HFNC can reduce work of breathing and can increase washout of dead space, which could result in lower re-intubation rate and lower NIV use rate after planned extubation in hypoxemic patients. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of NIV use or reintubation in 48 hours between two groups of different flow rates.

[Secondary endpoints] ICU mortality In-hospital mortality 28-day mortality Time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation AUC(area under curve) of respiratory rate (0-24 hours) AUC of heart rate (0-24 hours) PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 4 and 24 hours Change of arterial CO2 level(mmHg) at 4 and 24 hours Proportion of respiratory acidosis (arterial blood gas: pH\<7.35) at 4 and 24 hours Proportion of Intolerance (up titration of flow or/and FiO2; down titration of flow) in 24 hours

[Sample size] The event rate of primary endpoint, defined as a composite outcome of NIV use and or reintubation in 48 hours, was assumed to be 40% in the 40 L/min arms and 20% in the 60 L/min. We estimated that with a sample of 180 patients, the study would have 80% power to detect a 20% absolute reduction in proportion of composite outcomes, at a two-sided type I error rate of 5%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • high-flow nasal cannula
  • hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • oxygen therapy
  • postextubation respiratory failure
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • invasive mechanical ventilation > 48 hours
  • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg) as a main cause of invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • planned extubation \& already passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 20 years of ages
  • refusal to re-intubation
  • with terminal cancer
  • pregnant women
  • with a tracheal stoma or tracheostomy tube in situ
  • not feasible for high-flow nasal cannula(decided by the primary care team)
  • must required to use non-invasive ventilation immediately after extubation (decided by the primary care team)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    60 L/min arm

    The flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60 L/min after extubation.

    Other: Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min)

  • Experimental
    40 L/min arm

    The flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40 L/min after extubation.

    Other: Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min)

Interventions

  • OtherFlow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min)

    The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.

  • OtherFlow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min)

    The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A composite outcome of NIV(non-invasive ventilation) use or reintubation in 48 hours

    Proportion of patients require NIV(non-invasive ventilation) support or reintubation

    Time frame: 48 hours after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. ICU mortality

    Proportion of death in the ICU

    Time frame: ICU stay

  2. In-hospital mortality

    Proportion of death in the hospital

    Time frame: Hospital stay

  3. 28-day mortality

    Proportion of death in 28 days after extubation

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation

    Definition of successful liberation from mechanical ventilation: not requiring mechanical ventilation support for \> 48 hours

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. AUC(area under curve) of respiratory rate (0-24 hours)

    measure respiratory rate every 2 hours during HFNC use

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. AUC of heart rate (0-24 hours)

    measure heart rate every 2 hours during HFNC use

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Change of PaO2/FiO2 ratio between 0 and 24th hour

    PaO2: from arterial blood gas; FiO2:from HFNC setting

    Time frame: 24 hours

  8. Change of arterial CO2 level(mmHg) between 0 and 24th hour

    CO2 level

    Time frame: 24 hours

  9. Proportion of respiratory acidosis (arterial blood gas: pH<7.35) in 24 hours

    Respiratory acidosis

    Time frame: 24 hours

  10. Proportion of Intolerance in 24 hours

    subjective intolerance (Eg. temperature setting, flow setting, interface....)

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ruan SY, Teng NC, Wu HD, Tsai SL, Wang CY, Wu CP, Yu CJ, Chen L. Durability of Weaning Success for Liberation from Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: An Analysis of a Nationwide Database. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 15;196(6):792-795. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2153LE. No abstract available. PubMed 28170290 ↗
  • Saiphoklang N, Auttajaroon J. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation in medical wards at Thammasat University Hospital. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205106. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30286153 ↗
  • Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Helviz Y, Goligher EC, Jaber S, Ricard JD, Rittayamai N, Roca O, Antonelli M, Maggiore SM, Demoule A, Hodgson CL, Mercat A, Wilcox ME, Granton D, Wang D, Azoulay E, Ouanes-Besbes L, Cinnella G, Rauseo M, Carvalho C, Dessap-Mekontso A, Fraser J, Frat JP, Gomersall C, Grasselli G, Hernandez G, Jog S, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Talmor D, Thille AW, Brochard L, Burns KEA. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2226-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y. Epub 2020 Nov 17. PubMed 33201321 ↗
  • Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30888444 ↗
  • Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC. PubMed 27997805 ↗
  • Mauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, Cambiaghi B, Carlesso E, Taccone P, Bottino N, Lissoni A, Spadaro S, Volta CA, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1453-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4890-1. Epub 2017 Jul 31. PubMed 28762180 ↗
  • Mauri T, Galazzi A, Binda F, Masciopinto L, Corcione N, Carlesso E, Lazzeri M, Spinelli E, Tubiolo D, Volta CA, Adamini I, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. Crit Care. 2018 May 9;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4. PubMed 29743098 ↗
  • Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC. PubMed 25003980 ↗
  • Rittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care. 2014 Apr;59(4):485-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02397. Epub 2013 Sep 17. PubMed 24046462 ↗
  • Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711. PubMed 26975498 ↗
  • Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194. Erratum In: JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2047-2048. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16337. JAMA. 2017 Feb 28;317(8):858. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0268. PubMed 27706464 ↗
  • Fernandez R, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Masclans JR, Lesmes A, Panadero L, Hernandez G. High-flow nasal cannula to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0270-9. Epub 2017 May 2. PubMed 28466461 ↗
  • Song HZ, Gu JX, Xiu HQ, Cui W, Zhang GS. The value of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct;72(9):562-567. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)07. PubMed 29069260 ↗
  • Theerawit P, Natpobsuk N, Petnak T, Sutherasan Y. The efficacy of the WhisperFlow CPAP system versus high flow nasal cannula in patients at risk for postextubation failure: A Randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 28. PubMed 33012589 ↗
  • Jing G, Li J, Hao D, Wang T, Sun Y, Tian H, Fu Z, Zhang Y, Wang X. Comparison of high flow nasal cannula with noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia in preventing postextubation respiratory failure: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):217-225. doi: 10.1002/nur.21942. Epub 2019 Mar 18. PubMed 30887549 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04934163
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2023
Completion
Apr 30, 2023
Last update
May 10, 2024

Study contacts

Daniel Fu-Chang Tsai, MD, PhD
study director · Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion