ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04912232Updated May 24, 2024Results posted

Trauma Study: Early Warning of Progression Toward Hemodynamic Deterioration After Trauma

An interventional study of Detection of Occult Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients in Occult Bleeding and Hemorrhage, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-24.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
Grant funding for the study ended.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is Phase 3 of a three-phase DOD CDMRP funded project for the development of a multi-technology poly-anatomic noninvasive system for early detection of occult hemorrhage.

Early detection of ongoing hemorrhage (OH) before onset of shock is a universally acknowledged great unmet need, and particularly important after trauma. Delays in the detection of OH are associated with a "failure to rescue" and a dramatic deterioration in prognosis once the onset of clinically frank shock has occurred. An early alert to the presence of OH with an acceptable rate of false-positives and false-negatives would save countless lives. Additionally, such technology would save significant time, money and effort by allowing medical resources to be applied more accurately - the essence of precision medicine. An automated system would monitor currently stable patients continuously, leaving clinicians free to care for patients in need of attention.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will enroll 480 trauma patients in a "no significant risk" prospective clinical trial to 1) evaluate the performance of a Mark I prototype, 2) validate the performance of the Phase II algorithm, and 3) re-train the algorithm to Phase III iteration.

This is not a therapeutic study. The main outcome variables are non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning, not real-time patient management. The data generated will be used later for discovery and validation in traditional and innovative machine learning.

As a minimal risk study, there will be no change from standard of care for patients undergoing surgery. The surgical procedures and pharmacotherapies will proceed as per standard clinical management.

Enrolled patients will undergo standard preoperative, anesthetic, and postoperative physiological monitoring that includes:

Electrocardiogram: Heart rate and electrical activity of the heart will be recorded via a 3-lead ECG.

Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2): Pulse oximetry will be recorded using a commercially available finger pulse oximeter.

Finger Photoplethysmography: waveforms will be obtained non-invasively from either the SpO2 photoplethysmography or alternatively a Flashback Technologies Compensatory Reserve Index (CRI™) device.

In addition to these standard physiologic measurements, as a part of the research, the investigators will also acquire the following non-invasive optical and impedance measurements. All of these devices have been previously validated as non-invasive and safe in humans. The impedance electrodes and optical emitter/detectors will be incorporated into easily applied latex-free based "belts" that will be applied to anatomic locations along the thorax, abdomen and thigh. Application of these belts will be as soon as practical after patient arrival.

The clinicians providing care to the patient will be blind with respect to the measurements from these devices.

Continuous-wave Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (CW-NIRS) Device, custom built:

The device is built on an Ocean Optics FLAME USB Spectrometers, with two OSRAM 4736 NIR LEDs in plastic holders meant to be taped or strapped to the patient on the chest/torso and thigh locations. An Oceans Optics tungsten-halogen light source is used for an additional probe location on the forehead. Probe holders are designed to collect light from surface of skin by means of a mirror and collimator. The device will collect data on light attenuation of muscle in models of shock/trauma. The light output for all locations is below the ANSI limits for maximum permissible skin exposure.

SwissTom Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) System:

Name of device: Pioneer Set (Electrical Impedance Tomography System) Device Manufacturer: SwissTom AG (Parent company SenTec AG)

This device monitors dynamically changing perfusion physiology. To record multiplexed impedance signature a belt of 16-32 electrodes is placed around the thorax above the nipple line and thigh and impedances are recorded between multiple sets of electrodes.

SwissTom develops a clinical EIT system that is approved for pulmonary imaging. This Pioneer system is their research platform that has similar functionality and safety performance to their clinical system but provides research teams with access to raw data and additional functionality for specifying imaging parameters (e.g. control of frame rates, signal frequency acquisition, electrode drive patterns).

ScioSpec MultiChannel Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) System:

Name of device: ISX-Mini (MultiChannel Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy System) Device Manufacturer: ScioSpec

To record multiplexed impedance signatures- an array of 4 electrodes is placed around the cranium and thorax of the patient and impedance spectroscopy signatures are recorded at each anatomic location. This device monitors dynamically changing intracranial, intrathoracic and intra-abdominal physiology.

General Approach to Minimize Risk:

This protocol will be minimal risk to patients as there is little risk associated with the placement of these devices and they can be removed at any time. They don't interfere with standard equipment used in clinical management of trauma patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Occult Bleeding
  • Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Occult Bleeding
  • Hemorrhage
  • Hemorrhagic Shock
  • Trauma Injury
  • Precision Medicine
  • Triage
  • Bioimpedance
  • Electrical Impedance Tomography
  • Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy
  • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,011 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 466 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 100 across 1,990 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 486 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Awake and alert GCS >14
  2. Admission systolic blood pressure greater than 90 and heart rate less than 120
  3. Without signs of clinically significant ongoing external hemorrhage with no active bleeding documented on radiology/ultrasound and stable vital signs (no signs of hemodynamic deterioration) during initial evaluation (approximately 15 minutes post admission)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Altered mental status GCS \< 13
  2. Systolic blood pressure less than 90 or heart rate greater than 120
  3. Need for ongoing fluid or pressor support (standard local fluid resuscitation only)
  4. Clinically significant ongoing external hemorrhage
  5. Respiratory distress with O2 saturation \<96%
  6. Pre-existing systemic illness, likely to alter systemic cardiovascular response to hemorrhage (overt clinical heart failure). Including congestive heart failure, and a paced cardiac rhythm.
  7. Pregnant
  8. Prisoner status
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trauma Patients

    Patients suffering blunt and/or penetrating trauma but without physiologic criteria suggestive of ongoing hemorrhage: 1. Awake and alert GCS \>14 2. Admission systolic blood pressure greater than 90 and heart rate less than 120 3. Without signs of clinically significant ongoing external hemorrhage with no active bleeding documented on radiology/ultrasound and stable vital signs (no signs of hemodynamic deterioration) during initial evaluation (approximately 15 minutes post admission)

    Device: Detection of Occult Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients

Interventions

  • DeviceDetection of Occult Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients

    Non-invasive monitoring of trauma patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Algorithm Performance: Time of Alarm Before Onset of Deterioration

    Time frame: patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours

  2. Algorithm Performance: Sensitivity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome

    Time frame: patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours

  3. Algorithm Performance: Specificity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome

    Time frame: patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours

  4. Algorithm Performance: Positive Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome

    Time frame: patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours

  5. Algorithm Performance: Negative Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome

    Time frame: patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTrauma Patients
Started1
Completed1
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryAlgorithm Performance: Time of Alarm Before Onset of Deterioration
Time frame:
patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours
Reported as:
Number · minutes
Algorithm Performance: Time of Alarm Before Onset of Deterioration
minutesTrauma Patients
Algorithm Performance: Time of Alarm Before Onset of DeteriorationNA
PrimaryAlgorithm Performance: Sensitivity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
Time frame:
patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours
Reported as:
Number · percent
Algorithm Performance: Sensitivity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
percentTrauma Patients
Algorithm Performance: Sensitivity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm OutcomeNA
PrimaryAlgorithm Performance: Specificity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
Time frame:
patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours
Reported as:
Number · percent
Algorithm Performance: Specificity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
percentTrauma Patients
Algorithm Performance: Specificity as Measured by for Alarm/no Alarm OutcomeNA
PrimaryAlgorithm Performance: Positive Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
Time frame:
patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours
Reported as:
Number · percent
Algorithm Performance: Positive Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
percentTrauma Patients
Algorithm Performance: Positive Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm OutcomeNA
PrimaryAlgorithm Performance: Negative Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
Time frame:
patient data will be collected over 3-6 hours
Reported as:
Number · percent
Algorithm Performance: Negative Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm Outcome
percentTrauma Patients
Algorithm Performance: Negative Predictive Value for Alarm/no Alarm OutcomeNA

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Trauma Patients0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Trauma Patients
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Trauma Patients
Female1
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Trauma Patients
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Trauma Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White1
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Trauma Patients
United States1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Baystate Medical Center
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shackelford SA, Colton K, Stansbury LG, Galvagno SM Jr, Anazodo AN, DuBose JJ, Hess JR, Mackenzie CF. Early identification of uncontrolled hemorrhage after trauma: current status and future direction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Sep;77(3 Suppl 2):S222-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000198. No abstract available. PubMed 24770559 ↗
  • Parks JK, Elliott AC, Gentilello LM, Shafi S. Systemic hypotension is a late marker of shock after trauma: a validation study of Advanced Trauma Life Support principles in a large national sample. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.034. PubMed 17161083 ↗
  • Wo CC, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, Hardin E. Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med. 1993 Feb;21(2):218-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199302000-00012. PubMed 8428472 ↗
  • Convertino VA, Moulton SL, Grudic GZ, Rickards CA, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Gerhardt RT, Blackbourne LH, Ryan KL. Use of advanced machine-learning techniques for noninvasive monitoring of hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S25-32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182211601. PubMed 21795890 ↗
  • Convertino VA. Blood pressure measurement for accurate assessment of patient status in emergency medical settings. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jun;83(6):614-9. doi: 10.3357/asem.3204.2012. PubMed 22764618 ↗
  • Kim SH, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, Rinehart J, Yu Z, Canales C, Cannesson M. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014 May;120(5):1080-97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000226. PubMed 24637618 ↗
  • Soller BR, Yang Y, Soyemi OO, Ryan KL, Rickards CA, Walz JM, Heard SO, Convertino VA. Noninvasively determined muscle oxygen saturation is an early indicator of central hypovolemia in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):475-81. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00600.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 15. PubMed 18006869 ↗
  • Belle A, Ansari S, Spadafore M, Convertino VA, Ward KR, Derksen H, Najarian K. A Signal Processing Approach for Detection of Hemodynamic Instability before Decompensation. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148544. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26871715 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 18, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Oct 13, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At this time, there are no plans to share IPD.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04912232
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense, Dartmouth College, Baystate Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2021
Start date
Dec 8, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2022
Completion
Dec 8, 2022
Results posted
May 24, 2024
Last update
May 24, 2024

Study contacts

Noman Paradis, MD
principal investigator · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion