An interventional study of Root canal irrigation in Endodontically Treated Teeth, sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-15.
Sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Post-operative pain values of the participants will be recorded and evaluated with the VAS scale.
Postoperative pain values of the techniques will be compared with statistical evaluation.
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Materials and Methods: The study will be carried out on 140 patients with molar teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. After the root canal preparation is completed, the patients will be divided into 4 groups according to the irrigation activation system; Conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), EDDY, EndoActivator (EA) and Xp-endo Finisher (XPF). After the irrigation process is completed, the root canals will be filled using gutta-percha and canal sealer and the treatment will be completed in one session. Pain values at 6, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after treatment will be evaluated at a 0.05% significance level using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
113 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth, Nonvital; 19 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 50 across 103 interventional studies indexed under Tooth, Nonvital.
Browse Tooth, Nonvital studies →Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
During the final irrigation procedure, a 30 - G side vented needle was placed 2 mm shorter than the working length and was applied without agitation. 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel. Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
Device: Root canal irrigation
Xp Endo Finisher file was used with VDW Silver (VDW) endomotor at 800 rpm speed and 1 Ncm torque according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Xp Endo Finisher file was placed in the canal, 2 mm shorter than the working length, and was used with slow movements of 7-8 mm amplitude in the canal during activation. 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel. Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
Device: Root canal irrigation
An EDDY tip of size 25/04 was used for sonic activation. The EDDY was placed in the duct 2 mm shorter than the working length and the activation process was performed with slow movements with an amplitude of 2-4 mm. In the irrigation process, 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCI was applied for 1 minute for each channel. Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
Device: Root canal irrigation
Medium Endoactivator tip of 25 / .04 size was used for irrigation activation. Medium type was placed in the canal 2 mm shorter than the working length and activation was performed by making short strokes of 2-3 mm. 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel. Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
Device: Root canal irrigation
Devices used during root canal irrigation
Also known as: EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK)-XP-endo Finisher (XPF; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)- EDDY (EDDY; VDW, Munich, Germany)-
Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures Based On Different İrrigation Activation Tecniques: A Randomized, Clinical Trial
Preoperative pain of the patients before the treatment was recorded with the VAS scale. Pain levels were classified as 0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain .After the treatment of the patients, a pain assessment form was given to the patient in order to evaluate the postoperative pain. Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on the VAS scale. The marking procedure was taught to the patients by a blinded researcher from the groups. When the patients came to the control appointment, VAS scales were collected and the data were analyzed.
Time frame: one week(7 days)
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University