ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04878458PVPUpdated Dec 11, 2024

Phacotrabeculectomy Versus Phacogoniotomy (PVP) in Advanced Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma

An interventional study of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with goniosynechialysis and goniotomy and phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy in Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-11.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A multicenter, parallel, open, non-inferior randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of phacotrabeculectomy and phacogoniotomy in the treatment of advanced primary angle closure glaucoma, so as to provide a better surgical alternative.

Read the detailed description

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) accounted for the majority particularly in Asia and China. The preferred treatment method is anti-glaucoma surgery-trabeculectomy (Trab) combined with lens extraction. Phacotrabeculectomy has become the first-line choice of anti-glaucoma suregery in the treatment of advanced PACG. However, it was not an ideal method due to the bleb-related complications and troublesome postoperative nursing, as well as the difficulty for surgeons, caused by trabeculectomy. However, recent studies revealed that the phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation (PEI) combined with goniosynechialysis (GSL) has achieved efficacy in the treatment of PACG.

With the advent of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS), there is an increasing number studies indicating the MIGS performed great efficacy in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. While,there were a few small-sampled retrospective studies which showed therapeutic effects in PACG. The GSL plus goniotomy (GT) could achieve great efficacy in lowering the intraocular pressure of PACG patients. However, there is still a lack of high quality and high-level randomized controlled trials.

Therefore, this study intends to conduct a multicenter, parallel, open, non-inferior randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of PEI+ Trab and PEI+GSL+GT in the treatment of advanced PACG, so as to provide a better surgical treatment for PACG.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

Keywords

  • Glaucoma, Angle-Closure
03

In context

Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

91 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 57 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure.

Browse Glaucoma, Angle-Closure studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,690 studies on the registry; 619 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Inclusion criteria

    1. Aged 40-80 years;
    2. Diagnosed with advanced PACG: meet with (1) (2) (3) or (1) (2) (4)

      1. At least 180-degree PAS under gonioscopy and it should cover the nasal and inferior quadrants for surgical purposes;
      2. IOP >21 mmHg with or without anti-glaucoma medication;
      3. Obvious glaucomatous optic neuropathy (cup-to-disc [C/D] ratio≥0.7, or C/D asymmetry > 0.2, or the rim width at the superior and inferior temporal \< 0.1 vertical diameters of optic disc);
      4. With glaucomatous visual field defects, such as nasal step, arcuate scotoma, and paracentral scotoma on a reliable Humphrey analyzer using SITA-Standard 24-2 or 30-2 algorithm; mean deviation ≤ -12dB;
    3. Clinically obvious cataract and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) \<0.63 (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, [ETDRS] chart), or need lens extraction assessed by a clinician;
    4. Voluntarily participate in study and provide signed .
  • Exclusion criteria a. History of ocular surgery (other than laser iridotomy or laser iriplasty) or trauma; b. With other types of glaucoma; (i.e. open angle glaucoma, secondary angle-closure glaucoma, steroidal glaucoma, angle regression glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, nanophthalmos, pseudoexfoliation syndrome) c. The International Standardized Ratio > 3.0 for patients receiving warfarin or anticoagulant therapy before surgery; d. With retinal disease that affects the collection of ocular parameters; f. Monophthalmia (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] \<0.01 in the non-study eye); g. With other serious systemic diseases; h. Pregnant or lactating women * If both eyes are eligible for the study, the eye with the worse UCVA will be recruited.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEI+GSL+GT

    Sixty-two patients with advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma will receive phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with goniosynechialysis and goniotomy.

    Procedure: phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with goniosynechialysis and goniotomy

  • Experimental
    PEI+Trab

    Sixty-two patients with advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma will receive phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy.

    Procedure: phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy

Interventions

  • Procedurephacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with goniosynechialysis and goniotomy

    The patients enrolled underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with goniosynechialysis and goniotomy.

  • Procedurephacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy

    The patients enrolled underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change of intraocular pressure

    Change from baseline IOP after surgery using Goldmann or non-contact tonometer.

    Time frame: Postoperative 12, 24, 36 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative success rate of surgery

    (i) Complete success is defined as the postoperative IOP between 5 and 18 mmHg, and 20% reduction from baseline with no need for IOP-lowering medication. (ii) Qualified success is defined as the postoperative IOP between 5 and 18 mmHg, and 20% reduction from baseline with or without IOP-lowering medication.

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36 months

  2. Intraoperative and postoperative complications

    For example, shallow anterior chamber, hyphema, persistent hypotony, corneal endothelium decompensation, endophthalmitis, and other filtering bleb-related complications.

    Time frame: 0, 1, 7 day. 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months

  3. Anti-glaucomatous medications

    Numbers and types of anti-glaucomatous medications

    Time frame: 0, 1, 7 day. 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months

Other outcomes

  1. Visual acuity

    Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity will be documented using ETDRS chart.

    Time frame: 0, 1, 7 day. 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months

  2. Degree of peripheral anterior synechia

    The peripheral anterior synechia is checked using gonioscopy.

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 36 months

  3. Corneal endothelial cell counting

    Corneal endothelial cell counting will be documented using specular microscope.

    Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 36 months

  4. Visual field

    Visual field examination is performed using Humphrey analyzer.

    Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 36 months

  5. Optic nerve head morphology and retinal parameters

    Optic nerve head morphology and retinal parameters based on optical coherence tomography (Cirrus 5000, Zeiss, CA, USA or Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany)

    Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 36 months

  6. Measurement of quality of life

    Quality of life is measured with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

    Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 36 months

  7. Filtering bleb classification

    Filtering bleb classification based on Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36 months

  8. Time-consuming of operation and the surgery cost

    Time-consuming of operation and the surgery cost are based on the electronic healthy system.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Husain R, Do T, Lai J, Kitnarong N, Nongpiur ME, Perera SA, Ho CL, Lim SK, Aung T. Efficacy of Phacoemulsification Alone vs Phacoemulsification With Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle-Closure Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 1;137(10):1107-1113. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2493. PubMed 31294768 ↗
  • Barry M, Alahmadi MW, Alahmadi M, AlMuzaini A, AlMohammadi M. The Safety of the Kahook Dual Blade in the Surgical Treatment of Glaucoma. Cureus. 2020 Jan 16;12(1):e6682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6682. PubMed 31976190 ↗
  • Tanito M, Sugihara K, Tsutsui A, Hara K, Manabe K, Matsuoka Y. Midterm Results of Microhook ab Interno Trabeculotomy in Initial 560 Eyes with Glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 17;10(4):814. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040814. PubMed 33671386 ↗
  • Grover DS, Smith O, Fellman RL, Godfrey DG, Gupta A, Montes de Oca I, Feuer WJ. Gonioscopy-assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy: An Ab Interno Circumferential Trabeculotomy: 24 Months Follow-up. J Glaucoma. 2018 May;27(5):393-401. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000956. PubMed 29613978 ↗
  • Dorairaj S, Tam MD, Balasubramani GK. Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification, Goniosynechialysis, and Excisional Goniotomy For Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020 Oct 6;10(2):183-187. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000321. PubMed 33031110 ↗
  • Tham CC, Kwong YY, Baig N, Leung DY, Li FC, Lam DS. Phacoemulsification versus trabeculectomy in medically uncontrolled chronic angle-closure glaucoma without cataract. Ophthalmology. 2013 Jan;120(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 15. PubMed 22986111 ↗
  • Song Y, Li F, Zhang X. Response: Comment on "Phacogoniotomy versus phacotrabeculectomy for advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract: A randomized non-inferiority trial". Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024 May-Jun;13(3):100076. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100076. Epub 2024 May 23. No abstract available. PubMed 38795868 ↗
  • Song Y, Lin F, Lv A, Zhang Y, Lu L, Xie L, Tang G, Yuan H, Yang Y, Xu J, Lu P, Xiao M, Zhu X, Yan X, Song W, Li X, Zhang H, Li F, Wang Z, Jin L, Gao X, Liang X, Zhou M, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Chen W, Wang N, Tham CC, Barton K, Park KH, Aung T, Weinreb RN, Tang L, Fan S, Lam DSC, Zhang X; PVP Study group. Phacogoniotomy versus phacotrabeculectomy for advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract: A randomized non-inferiority trial. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024 Jan-Feb;13(1):100033. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2023.100033. Epub 2023 Dec 26. PubMed 38383075 ↗
  • Song Y, Song W, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Xiao M, Zhao X, Lv A, Yan X, Lu P, Zhu X, Gao X, Hu K, Zhang Y, Liang X, Zhang X, Tang G, Lu L, Zhou M, Fan S, Xie L, Jin L, Tang L, Yuan H, Zhang X; PVP Study group. Efficacy and safety of phacotrabeculectomy versus phacogoniotomy in advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma: study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (PVP Study). BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e056876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056876. PubMed 34880029 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in May 2023, 23 months.

Of 28 interventional studies with no phase under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 43. This study's 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 6, 2021
First posted
May 7, 2021
StartActual
May 31, 2021
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2023
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 11, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04878458
Collaborators
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, West China Hospital, First Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Union hospital of Fujian Medical University, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Handan City Eye Hospital, Chongqing Medical University
Responsible party
Xiulan Zhang (Director of Clinical Research Center, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2021
Start date
May 31, 2021
Primary completion
May 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 11, 2024

Study contacts

Xiulan Zhang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion