An observational study in Crohn Disease and Rectal Fistula, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 5 sites in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-05.
Sponsored by Takeda · Observational
The main aim of the study is to assess the quality of life of people with Crohn's disease after treatment for complex perianal fistulas (CPF) in a standard clinic setting.
Study doctors will review the participants' medical records in the last 3 years. Participants will also be asked to visit the clinic once to complete 1 questionnaire on their quality of life.
This is a national, observational, cross-sectional study. The study will assess the general QoL among CD participants with CPFs in the Portuguese routine clinical practice.
This study will enroll approximately 80 participants. All participants will be enrolled in one observational cohort.
The data will be collected retrospectively, from the medical records, on healthcare resource utilization and on the pharmacological and surgical treatments used for the management of CPFs in the three years prior to the inclusion visit.
This multi-center trial will be conducted in Portugal. The overall duration of this study is approximately 8 months.
1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 461 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 162 across 608 observational studies indexed under Crohn Disease.
Browse Crohn Disease studies →Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,002 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.
Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 149 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants diagnosed with CD and CPFs in the Portuguese routine clinical practice will be assessed.
Presence of CPF(s), defined as >=1 of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants diagnosed with CD and CPF in the Portuguese routine clinical practice were assessed. Retrospective data on healthcare resource utilization related with CPF management in the previous three years was obtained from the medical records.
Meta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12]
SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), of which the PCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The PCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Meta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12])
SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the PCS and the MCS, of which the MCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The MCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better mental functioning.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score
The SIBDQ is an instrument used to assess QoL and is a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, that consists of 10 questions, each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor quality of life) to 7 (good quality of life). The total score is reported and ranges from 10 to 70 with a higher score indicating a better health-related QoL.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Sexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants
SQOL-M assessed the relationship between male sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It contains 11 items, each items are scored from 1 to 6 points (worst to best), completely agree = 1 to completely disagree = 6. The total score can range from 11 to 66 points. Higher scores indicate better male sexual quality of life.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants
SQOL-F assessed the relationship between female sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It consists of 18 items, rated using a six-point scale (completely agree to completely disagree). The total score can range from 18 to 108 points. Higher scores indicate better female sexual quality of life.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Fecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score
Fecal incontinence is measured by Wexner score. It consists of five questions to assess the degree of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration). The frequency of each type of incontinence is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to once a day) so that the sum of the frequencies add up to a total score that ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse fecal incontinence.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) as Assessed by WPAI Questionnaire Score
WPAI score was used to describe the indirect healthcare resources. It is self-administered 6-item questionnaire (scale of 0-10) which assesses the effect of disease on work productivity in the past 7 days obtained for absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment / disability. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), Domain scores are expressed as a percentage, with a range of scores form 0-100%, with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Number of Participants Characterized Based on Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Within Previous 3 Years
Number of participants characterized based on HCRU associated with complex perianal fistulas (CPFs) management within the three years prior to the inclusion visit were collected. HCRU includes gastroenterology and other medical specialty appointments for the management of CPF; emergency room visits due to CPF; hospitalizations (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) due to CPF, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Only categories with at least one participant with event are reported.
Time frame: Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
Sociodemographic and anthropometric variables included age (in years), sex (male or female), and body mass index (BMI).
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CD) Stratified by Clinical Characteristics
The Montreal classification index for CD is used to classify the extent of the disease activity. It consists of two parameters: location and behavior of the disease activity. There are four different disease locations presented: Location 1 (L1) is ileum, Location 2 (L2) is colonic disease, Location 3 (L3) is ileocolon and Location 4 (L4) is isolated upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease. The first three categories (L1-L3) is combined with L4 where disease sites coexisted. There are 4 different categories for the behavior of the disease activity: Behavior 1 (B1) is non stenosing or non penetrating; Behavior 2 (B2) was stenosing; Behavior 3 (B3) is penetrating and p as perianal disease (p). The first 3 categories (B1 to B3) could be added with p to indicate coexisting perianal disease. Perianal disease (p) is defined as the presence of perianal abscesses or fistulae.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Number of Participants Characterized Based on Pharmacological Treatments and Surgeries for CPF
For each pharmacological treatment (antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies, immunosuppressants, and others), participants were divided into three categories (current users, past users, and non-users) considering the three years prior to the inclusion visit. Surgical treatment in the last three years for the management of CPF was also recorded. A participant may be included in more than one category.
Time frame: Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1
Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as PCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables
The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. PCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as MCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables
The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. MCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables
The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables
The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, PDAI score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.
Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Data from participants were collected for this cross-sectional, observational study with a retrospective component at two investigative sites in Portugal from 9 July 2021 to 27 May 2022.
| Milestone | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Started | 15 |
| Completed | 15 |
| Not completed | 0 |
SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), of which the PCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The PCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Meta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12] | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the PCS and the MCS, of which the MCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The MCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better mental functioning.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Meta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12]) | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
The SIBDQ is an instrument used to assess QoL and is a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, that consists of 10 questions, each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor quality of life) to 7 (good quality of life). The total score is reported and ranges from 10 to 70 with a higher score indicating a better health-related QoL.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score | 45.00 ± 10.72 |
SQOL-M assessed the relationship between male sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It contains 11 items, each items are scored from 1 to 6 points (worst to best), completely agree = 1 to completely disagree = 6. The total score can range from 11 to 66 points. Higher scores indicate better male sexual quality of life.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Sexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants | 44.57 ± 14.59 |
SQOL-F assessed the relationship between female sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It consists of 18 items, rated using a six-point scale (completely agree to completely disagree). The total score can range from 18 to 108 points. Higher scores indicate better female sexual quality of life.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants | 72.80 ± 25.54 |
Fecal incontinence is measured by Wexner score. It consists of five questions to assess the degree of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration). The frequency of each type of incontinence is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to once a day) so that the sum of the frequencies add up to a total score that ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse fecal incontinence.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Fecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score | 7.43 ± 5.50 |
WPAI score was used to describe the indirect healthcare resources. It is self-administered 6-item questionnaire (scale of 0-10) which assesses the effect of disease on work productivity in the past 7 days obtained for absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment / disability. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), Domain scores are expressed as a percentage, with a range of scores form 0-100%, with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Absenteeism | 3.80 ± 6.85 |
| Presenteeism | 57.78 ± 29.91 |
| Work Productivity Loss | 58.89 ± 30.28 |
| Activity Impairment | 52.67 ± 31.27 |
Number of participants characterized based on HCRU associated with complex perianal fistulas (CPFs) management within the three years prior to the inclusion visit were collected. HCRU includes gastroenterology and other medical specialty appointments for the management of CPF; emergency room visits due to CPF; hospitalizations (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) due to CPF, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Only categories with at least one participant with event are reported.
| Participants | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Any Medical Specialty Appointments for the Management of CPF | 15 |
| Emergency Room Visits due to CPF | 3 |
| Hospitalizations (>= 24 Hours) due to CPF | 5 |
Sociodemographic and anthropometric variables included age (in years), sex (male or female), and body mass index (BMI).
| Participants | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Age: 22 to 64 Years | 15 |
| Sex: Female | 8 |
| Sex: Male | 7 |
| BMI: Underweight | 0 |
| BMI: Normal range | 9 |
| BMI: Overweight | 4 |
| BMI: Obese | 2 |
The Montreal classification index for CD is used to classify the extent of the disease activity. It consists of two parameters: location and behavior of the disease activity. There are four different disease locations presented: Location 1 (L1) is ileum, Location 2 (L2) is colonic disease, Location 3 (L3) is ileocolon and Location 4 (L4) is isolated upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease. The first three categories (L1-L3) is combined with L4 where disease sites coexisted. There are 4 different categories for the behavior of the disease activity: Behavior 1 (B1) is non stenosing or non penetrating; Behavior 2 (B2) was stenosing; Behavior 3 (B3) is penetrating and p as perianal disease (p). The first 3 categories (B1 to B3) could be added with p to indicate coexisting perianal disease. Perianal disease (p) is defined as the presence of perianal abscesses or fistulae.
| Participants | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Disease Location 1: Terminal Ileum | 4 |
| Disease Location 1 + 4: Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal | 1 |
| Disease Location 2: Colon | 3 |
| Disease Location 3: Ileocolon | 5 |
| Disease Location 3 + 4: Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal | 2 |
| Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B1p: Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal | 8 |
| Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B2p: Stricturing + Perianal | 5 |
| Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B3p: Penetrating + Perianal | 2 |
For each pharmacological treatment (antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies, immunosuppressants, and others), participants were divided into three categories (current users, past users, and non-users) considering the three years prior to the inclusion visit. Surgical treatment in the last three years for the management of CPF was also recorded. A participant may be included in more than one category.
| Participants | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Current Users: Antibiotics | 2 |
| Current Users: Monoclonal Antibodies | 13 |
| Current Users: Immunosuppressants | 7 |
| Past Users: Antibiotics | 10 |
| Past Users: Monoclonal Antibodies | 2 |
| Past Users: Immunosuppressants | 2 |
| Non-users: Antibiotics | 5 |
| Non-users: Monoclonal Antibodies | 2 |
| Non-users: Immunosuppressants | 7 |
| Non-users: Others | 15 |
| Surgical Treatment in the Last Three Years for the Management of CPF- Yes | 11 |
| Surgical Treatment in the Last Three Years for the Management of CPF- No | 1 |
The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. PCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| PCS-12: Sex- Male | 48.63 ± 8.16 |
| PCS-12: Sex- Female | 42.50 ± 6.15 |
| PCS-12: Employment Status- Employed | 44.01 ± 7.33 |
| PCS-12: Employment Status- Unemployed | 48.22 ± 12.30 |
| PCS-12: Employment Status- Retired | 48.18 ± 3.49 |
| PCS-12: Employment Status- Student | 43.25 ± NA |
| PCS-12: Smoking Status- Never | 47.90 ± 7.66 |
| PCS-12: Smoking Status- Former | 45.08 ± 0.42 |
| PCS-12: Smoking Status- Current | 41.40 ± 8.12 |
| PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - At or Below 16 Years | 45.37 ± NA |
| PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - Between 17 and 40 Years | 45.22 ± 9.06 |
| PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - Above 40 Years | 45.70 ± 4.70 |
| PCS-12: Disease Location 1- Terminal Ileum | 54.14 ± 4.46 |
| PCS-12: Disease Location 1 + 4- Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal | 43.25 ± NA |
| PCS-12: Disease Location 2- Colon | 41.14 ± 4.28 |
| PCS-12: Disease Location 3- Ileocolon | 43.64 ± 6.87 |
| PCS-12: Disease Location 3 + 4- Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal | 39.47 ± 8.34 |
| PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal | 44.25 ± 7.33 |
| PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Stricturing + Perianal | 47.61 ± 9.16 |
| PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Penetrating + Perianal | 44.15 ± 7.40 |
| PCS-12: Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- Yes | 49.37 ± 12.60 |
| PCS-12: Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- No | 44.74 ± 7.13 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- Yes | 50.72 ± 7.52 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- No | 44.02 ± 7.29 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- Yes | 41.58 ± 3.37 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- No | 46.30 ± 8.14 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- Yes | 38.08 ± 1.18 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- No | 46.48 ± 7.54 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- Yes | 39.64 ± 8.58 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- No | 46.24 ± 7.39 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Superficial Type- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- Yes | 54.65 ± 3.94 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- No | 43.93 ± 7.02 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- Yes | 42.89 ± 7.61 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- No | 45.98 ± 7.78 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- Yes | 46.12 ± 8.04 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- No | 43.26 ± 6.71 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- Yes | 43.77 ± 6.43 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- No | 46.42 ± 8.46 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Seton- Yes | 43.71 ± 4.71 |
| PCS-12: Fistula With Seton- No | 47.25 ± 10.02 |
| PCS-12: Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) Category- Remission | 46.62 ± 7.93 |
| PCS-12: HBI Category- Mild Activity | 38.85 ± 2.28 |
| PCS-12: HBI Category- Moderate Activity | 43.25 ± NA |
| PCS-12: Treatment-naïve- Yes | 34.51 ± NA |
| PCS-12: Treatment-naïve- No | 46.13 ± 7.23 |
| PCS-12: Surgery-naïve- Yes | 37.93 ± 6.75 |
| PCS-12: Surgery-naïve- No | 47.22 ± 6.79 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- Yes | 45.08 ± 0.42 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- No | 45.40 ± 8.19 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Advancement Flap- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - LIFT- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Fibrin Glue- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Anal Fistula Plug- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Defunctioning Stoma- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Cutting Seton- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- Yes | 46.56 ± 6.98 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- No | 43.56 ± 8.76 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Other- Yes | 47.28 ± 6.77 |
| PCS-12: Surgery - Other- No | 44.66 ± 8.05 |
| PCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- Yes | 47.57 ± 7.88 |
| PCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- No | 43.88 ± 7.47 |
| PCS-12: Presence of Anorectal Stricture- No | 45.36 ± 7.58 |
The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. MCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
| score on a scale | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| MCS-12: Sex- Male | 36.27 ± 5.60 |
| MCS-12: Sex- Female | 39.51 ± 10.56 |
| MCS-12: Employment Status- Employed | 35.84 ± 9.17 |
| MCS-12: Employment Status- Unemployed | 41.22 ± 7.89 |
| MCS-12: Employment Status- Retired | 45.19 ± 3.63 |
| MCS-12: Employment Status- Student | 33.45 ± NA |
| MCS-12: Smoking Status- Never | 38.54 ± 10.94 |
| MCS-12: Smoking Status- Former | 31.97 ± 2.62 |
| MCS-12: Smoking Status- Current | 39.55 ± 4.37 |
| MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- At or Below 16 Years | 30.11 ± NA |
| MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- Between 17 and 40 Years | 36.73 ± 8.55 |
| MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- Above 40 Years | 43.16 ± 7.43 |
| MCS-12: Disease Location 1- Terminal Ileum | 34.08 ± 13.03 |
| MCS-12: Disease Location 1 + 4- Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal | 33.45 ± NA |
| MCS-12: Disease Location 2- Colon | 46.18 ± 4.86 |
| MCS-12: Disease Location 3- Ileocolon | 39.58 ± 4.32 |
| MCS-12: Disease Location 3 + 4- Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal | 31.89 ± 2.52 |
| MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal | 39.35 ± 7.19 |
| MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Stricturing + Perianal | 34.05 ± 11.26 |
| MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Penetrating + Perianal | 42.51 ± 2.35 |
| MCS-12: Presence of any Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- Yes | 38.80 ± 2.74 |
| MCS-12: Presence of any Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- No | 37.88 ± 9.12 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- Yes | 37.64 ± 4.63 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- No | 38.09 ± 9.36 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- Yes | 37.23 ± 6.16 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- No | 38.20 ± 9.19 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- Yes | 45.46 ± 6.53 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- No | 36.85 ± 8.35 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- Yes | 40.71 ± 9.96 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- No | 37.58 ± 8.62 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Superficial Type- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- Yes | 40.10 ± 14.47 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- No | 37.68 ± 8.11 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- Yes | 38.15 ± 5.38 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- No | 37.96 ± 9.29 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- Yes | 39.59 ± 7.05 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- No | 33.63 ± 11.63 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- Yes | 36.33 ± 9.95 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- No | 39.12 ± 7.78 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Seton- Yes | 36.36 ± 9.36 |
| MCS-12: Fistula With Seton- No | 39.87 ± 7.63 |
| MCS-12: HBI Category- Remission | 37.15 ± 8.66 |
| MCS-12: HBI Category- Mild Activity | 45.40 ± 6.60 |
| MCS-12: HBI Category- Moderate Activity | 33.45 ± NA |
| MCS-12: Treatment-naïve- Yes | 36.47 ± NA |
| MCS-12: Treatment-naïve- No | 38.11 ± 8.79 |
| MCS-12: Surgery-naïve- Yes | 39.30 ± 7.45 |
| MCS-12: Surgery-naïve- No | 37.68 ± 9.00 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- Yes | 31.97 ± 2.62 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- No | 38.93 ± 8.74 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Advancement Flap- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - LIFT- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Fibrin Glue- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Anal Fistula Plug- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Defunctioning Stoma- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Cutting Seton- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- Yes | 39.81 ± 9.46 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- No | 35.28 ± 6.60 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Other- Yes | 46.80 ± 3.98 |
| MCS-12: Surgery - Other- No | 34.80 ± 7.34 |
| MCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- Yes | 35.59 ± 10.91 |
| MCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- No | 39.61 ± 6.65 |
| MCS-12: Presence of Anorectal Stricture- No | 38.00 ± 8.48 |
The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.
| correlation coefficient | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| PCS- 12: Age | -0.072 |
| PCS- 12: BMI | 0.210 |
| PCS- 12: Time Between CD Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit | -0.014 |
| PCS- 12: Total Number of CPFs per Participant | -0.270 |
| PCS- 12: Time Since Seton Placement | -0.185 |
| PCS- 12: Time Between First CPF Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit | 0.071 |
| PCS- 12: PDAI Score | -0.707 |
| PCS - 12: Number of Internal Fistula Openings per Participant | -0.450 |
| PCS- 12: Number of External Fistula Openings per Participant | -0.442 |
| PCS- 12: SIBDQ Score | 0.525 |
| PCS- 12: SQoL-M Score | 0.690 |
| PCS- 12: SQoL-F Score | 0.046 |
| PCS- 12: Wexner Score | -0.259 |
The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, PDAI score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.
| correlation coefficient | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| MCS- 12: Age | 0.484 |
| MCS- 12: BMI | 0.022 |
| MCS- 12: Time Between CD Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit | -0.132 |
| MCS- 12: Total Number of CPFs per Participant | 0.077 |
| MCS- 12: Time Since Seton Placement | -0.323 |
| MCS- 12: Time Between First CPF Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit | -0.018 |
| MCS- 12: PDAI Score | 0.067 |
| MCS- 12: Number of Internal Fistula Openings per Participant | -0.207 |
| MCS- 12: Number of External Fistula Openings per Participant | -0.048 |
| MCS- 12: SIBDQ Score | 0.404 |
| MCS- 12: SQoL-M Score | 0.266 |
| MCS- 12: SQoL-F Score | 0.039 |
| MCS- 12: Wexner Score | -0.182 |
Collected over Up to 10 months 18 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD Participants With CPF | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 44.40 ± 12.39 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Female | 8 |
| Male | 7 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Portugal | 15 |
| Height(centimeter) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 168.60 ± 8.28 |
| Weight(kilogram (kg)) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 68.45 ± 12.05 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/meter^2) | CD Participants With CPF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 24.11 ± 4.11 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Takeda