CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04876690CONFLICTUpdated Aug 5, 2024Results posted

A Study of the Quality of Life in Adults With Crohn's Disease With Complex Perianal Fistulas

An observational study in Crohn Disease and Rectal Fistula, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 5 sites in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-05.

Sponsored by Takeda · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
15
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of the study is to assess the quality of life of people with Crohn's disease after treatment for complex perianal fistulas (CPF) in a standard clinic setting.

Study doctors will review the participants' medical records in the last 3 years. Participants will also be asked to visit the clinic once to complete 1 questionnaire on their quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This is a national, observational, cross-sectional study. The study will assess the general QoL among CD participants with CPFs in the Portuguese routine clinical practice.

This study will enroll approximately 80 participants. All participants will be enrolled in one observational cohort.

The data will be collected retrospectively, from the medical records, on healthcare resource utilization and on the pharmacological and surgical treatments used for the management of CPFs in the three years prior to the inclusion visit.

This multi-center trial will be conducted in Portugal. The overall duration of this study is approximately 8 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn Disease
  • Rectal Fistula

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 162 across 608 observational studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,002 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 149 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants diagnosed with CD and CPFs in the Portuguese routine clinical practice will be assessed.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosed with CD.
  2. Presence of CPF(s), defined as >=1 of the following criteria:

    • High intersphincteric, high transsphincteric, extrasphincteric, or suprasphincteric location;
    • >=2 external openings;
    • Associated collections.
  3. Attending routine gastroenterology appointments at the participating hospitals.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with ulcerative colitis or indeterminate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  2. With non-complex fistulas or with fistulas types other than perianal (example, rectovaginal).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • CD Participants With CPF

    Participants diagnosed with CD and CPF in the Portuguese routine clinical practice were assessed. Retrospective data on healthcare resource utilization related with CPF management in the previous three years was obtained from the medical records.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Meta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12]

    SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), of which the PCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The PCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  2. Meta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12])

    SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the PCS and the MCS, of which the MCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The MCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better mental functioning.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score

    The SIBDQ is an instrument used to assess QoL and is a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, that consists of 10 questions, each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor quality of life) to 7 (good quality of life). The total score is reported and ranges from 10 to 70 with a higher score indicating a better health-related QoL.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  2. Sexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants

    SQOL-M assessed the relationship between male sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It contains 11 items, each items are scored from 1 to 6 points (worst to best), completely agree = 1 to completely disagree = 6. The total score can range from 11 to 66 points. Higher scores indicate better male sexual quality of life.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  3. Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants

    SQOL-F assessed the relationship between female sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It consists of 18 items, rated using a six-point scale (completely agree to completely disagree). The total score can range from 18 to 108 points. Higher scores indicate better female sexual quality of life.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  4. Fecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score

    Fecal incontinence is measured by Wexner score. It consists of five questions to assess the degree of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration). The frequency of each type of incontinence is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to once a day) so that the sum of the frequencies add up to a total score that ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse fecal incontinence.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  5. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) as Assessed by WPAI Questionnaire Score

    WPAI score was used to describe the indirect healthcare resources. It is self-administered 6-item questionnaire (scale of 0-10) which assesses the effect of disease on work productivity in the past 7 days obtained for absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment / disability. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), Domain scores are expressed as a percentage, with a range of scores form 0-100%, with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  6. Number of Participants Characterized Based on Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Within Previous 3 Years

    Number of participants characterized based on HCRU associated with complex perianal fistulas (CPFs) management within the three years prior to the inclusion visit were collected. HCRU includes gastroenterology and other medical specialty appointments for the management of CPF; emergency room visits due to CPF; hospitalizations (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) due to CPF, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Only categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

    Time frame: Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1

  7. Number of Participants Categorized Based on Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Characteristics

    Sociodemographic and anthropometric variables included age (in years), sex (male or female), and body mass index (BMI).

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  8. Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CD) Stratified by Clinical Characteristics

    The Montreal classification index for CD is used to classify the extent of the disease activity. It consists of two parameters: location and behavior of the disease activity. There are four different disease locations presented: Location 1 (L1) is ileum, Location 2 (L2) is colonic disease, Location 3 (L3) is ileocolon and Location 4 (L4) is isolated upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease. The first three categories (L1-L3) is combined with L4 where disease sites coexisted. There are 4 different categories for the behavior of the disease activity: Behavior 1 (B1) is non stenosing or non penetrating; Behavior 2 (B2) was stenosing; Behavior 3 (B3) is penetrating and p as perianal disease (p). The first 3 categories (B1 to B3) could be added with p to indicate coexisting perianal disease. Perianal disease (p) is defined as the presence of perianal abscesses or fistulae.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  9. Number of Participants Characterized Based on Pharmacological Treatments and Surgeries for CPF

    For each pharmacological treatment (antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies, immunosuppressants, and others), participants were divided into three categories (current users, past users, and non-users) considering the three years prior to the inclusion visit. Surgical treatment in the last three years for the management of CPF was also recorded. A participant may be included in more than one category.

    Time frame: Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1

  10. Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as PCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables

    The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. PCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  11. Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as MCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables

    The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. MCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  12. Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables

    The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

  13. Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables

    The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, PDAI score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.

    Time frame: At inclusion visit (Day 1)

07

Results

Posted Aug 5, 2024

Participant flow

Data from participants were collected for this cross-sectional, observational study with a retrospective component at two investigative sites in Portugal from 9 July 2021 to 27 May 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCD Participants With CPF
Started15
Completed15
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMeta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12]

SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), of which the PCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The PCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Meta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12]
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Meta-Scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire's Physical Component Score [PCS-12]45.36 ± 7.58
PrimaryMeta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12])

SF-12 is 12-item self-report that assesses physical and mental health related general quality of life (QoL) whose results are expressed in terms of two meta-scores: the PCS and the MCS, of which the MCS component is presented in this outcome measure. The MCS score has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better mental functioning.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Meta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12])
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Meta-Scores of the SF-12 Questionnaire's Mental Component Score [MCS-12])38.00 ± 8.48
SecondaryShort Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score

The SIBDQ is an instrument used to assess QoL and is a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, that consists of 10 questions, each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor quality of life) to 7 (good quality of life). The total score is reported and ranges from 10 to 70 with a higher score indicating a better health-related QoL.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score45.00 ± 10.72
SecondarySexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants

SQOL-M assessed the relationship between male sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It contains 11 items, each items are scored from 1 to 6 points (worst to best), completely agree = 1 to completely disagree = 6. The total score can range from 11 to 66 points. Higher scores indicate better male sexual quality of life.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Sexual Quality of Life-Male (SQOL-M) Questionnaire Score for Male Participants44.57 ± 14.59
SecondarySexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants

SQOL-F assessed the relationship between female sexual dysfunction and quality of life. It consists of 18 items, rated using a six-point scale (completely agree to completely disagree). The total score can range from 18 to 108 points. Higher scores indicate better female sexual quality of life.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire Score for Female Participants72.80 ± 25.54
SecondaryFecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score

Fecal incontinence is measured by Wexner score. It consists of five questions to assess the degree of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration). The frequency of each type of incontinence is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to once a day) so that the sum of the frequencies add up to a total score that ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse fecal incontinence.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Fecal Incontinence as Assessed by Wexner Score7.43 ± 5.50
SecondaryWork Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) as Assessed by WPAI Questionnaire Score

WPAI score was used to describe the indirect healthcare resources. It is self-administered 6-item questionnaire (scale of 0-10) which assesses the effect of disease on work productivity in the past 7 days obtained for absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment / disability. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), Domain scores are expressed as a percentage, with a range of scores form 0-100%, with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) as Assessed by WPAI Questionnaire Score
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
Absenteeism3.80 ± 6.85
Presenteeism57.78 ± 29.91
Work Productivity Loss58.89 ± 30.28
Activity Impairment52.67 ± 31.27
SecondaryNumber of Participants Characterized Based on Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Within Previous 3 Years

Number of participants characterized based on HCRU associated with complex perianal fistulas (CPFs) management within the three years prior to the inclusion visit were collected. HCRU includes gastroenterology and other medical specialty appointments for the management of CPF; emergency room visits due to CPF; hospitalizations (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) due to CPF, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Only categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

Time frame:
Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Characterized Based on Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Within Previous 3 Years
ParticipantsCD Participants With CPF
Any Medical Specialty Appointments for the Management of CPF15
Emergency Room Visits due to CPF3
Hospitalizations (>= 24 Hours) due to CPF5
SecondaryNumber of Participants Categorized Based on Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Characteristics

Sociodemographic and anthropometric variables included age (in years), sex (male or female), and body mass index (BMI).

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
ParticipantsCD Participants With CPF
Age: 22 to 64 Years15
Sex: Female8
Sex: Male7
BMI: Underweight0
BMI: Normal range9
BMI: Overweight4
BMI: Obese2
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CD) Stratified by Clinical Characteristics

The Montreal classification index for CD is used to classify the extent of the disease activity. It consists of two parameters: location and behavior of the disease activity. There are four different disease locations presented: Location 1 (L1) is ileum, Location 2 (L2) is colonic disease, Location 3 (L3) is ileocolon and Location 4 (L4) is isolated upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease. The first three categories (L1-L3) is combined with L4 where disease sites coexisted. There are 4 different categories for the behavior of the disease activity: Behavior 1 (B1) is non stenosing or non penetrating; Behavior 2 (B2) was stenosing; Behavior 3 (B3) is penetrating and p as perianal disease (p). The first 3 categories (B1 to B3) could be added with p to indicate coexisting perianal disease. Perianal disease (p) is defined as the presence of perianal abscesses or fistulae.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CD) Stratified by Clinical Characteristics
ParticipantsCD Participants With CPF
Disease Location 1: Terminal Ileum4
Disease Location 1 + 4: Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal1
Disease Location 2: Colon3
Disease Location 3: Ileocolon5
Disease Location 3 + 4: Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal2
Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B1p: Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal8
Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B2p: Stricturing + Perianal5
Disease Behavior, Perianal Disease B3p: Penetrating + Perianal2
SecondaryNumber of Participants Characterized Based on Pharmacological Treatments and Surgeries for CPF

For each pharmacological treatment (antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies, immunosuppressants, and others), participants were divided into three categories (current users, past users, and non-users) considering the three years prior to the inclusion visit. Surgical treatment in the last three years for the management of CPF was also recorded. A participant may be included in more than one category.

Time frame:
Up to 3 years prior to the inclusion visit at Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Characterized Based on Pharmacological Treatments and Surgeries for CPF
ParticipantsCD Participants With CPF
Current Users: Antibiotics2
Current Users: Monoclonal Antibodies13
Current Users: Immunosuppressants7
Past Users: Antibiotics10
Past Users: Monoclonal Antibodies2
Past Users: Immunosuppressants2
Non-users: Antibiotics5
Non-users: Monoclonal Antibodies2
Non-users: Immunosuppressants7
Non-users: Others15
Surgical Treatment in the Last Three Years for the Management of CPF- Yes11
Surgical Treatment in the Last Three Years for the Management of CPF- No1
SecondaryCorrelation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as PCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables

The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. PCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as PCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
PCS-12: Sex- Male48.63 ± 8.16
PCS-12: Sex- Female42.50 ± 6.15
PCS-12: Employment Status- Employed44.01 ± 7.33
PCS-12: Employment Status- Unemployed48.22 ± 12.30
PCS-12: Employment Status- Retired48.18 ± 3.49
PCS-12: Employment Status- Student43.25 ± NA
PCS-12: Smoking Status- Never47.90 ± 7.66
PCS-12: Smoking Status- Former45.08 ± 0.42
PCS-12: Smoking Status- Current41.40 ± 8.12
PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - At or Below 16 Years45.37 ± NA
PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - Between 17 and 40 Years45.22 ± 9.06
PCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis - Above 40 Years45.70 ± 4.70
PCS-12: Disease Location 1- Terminal Ileum54.14 ± 4.46
PCS-12: Disease Location 1 + 4- Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal43.25 ± NA
PCS-12: Disease Location 2- Colon41.14 ± 4.28
PCS-12: Disease Location 3- Ileocolon43.64 ± 6.87
PCS-12: Disease Location 3 + 4- Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal39.47 ± 8.34
PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal44.25 ± 7.33
PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Stricturing + Perianal47.61 ± 9.16
PCS-12: Disease Behavior- Penetrating + Perianal44.15 ± 7.40
PCS-12: Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- Yes49.37 ± 12.60
PCS-12: Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- No44.74 ± 7.13
PCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- Yes50.72 ± 7.52
PCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- No44.02 ± 7.29
PCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- Yes41.58 ± 3.37
PCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- No46.30 ± 8.14
PCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- Yes38.08 ± 1.18
PCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- No46.48 ± 7.54
PCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- Yes39.64 ± 8.58
PCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- No46.24 ± 7.39
PCS-12: Fistula With Superficial Type- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- Yes54.65 ± 3.94
PCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- No43.93 ± 7.02
PCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- Yes42.89 ± 7.61
PCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- No45.98 ± 7.78
PCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- Yes46.12 ± 8.04
PCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- No43.26 ± 6.71
PCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- Yes43.77 ± 6.43
PCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- No46.42 ± 8.46
PCS-12: Fistula With Seton- Yes43.71 ± 4.71
PCS-12: Fistula With Seton- No47.25 ± 10.02
PCS-12: Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) Category- Remission46.62 ± 7.93
PCS-12: HBI Category- Mild Activity38.85 ± 2.28
PCS-12: HBI Category- Moderate Activity43.25 ± NA
PCS-12: Treatment-naïve- Yes34.51 ± NA
PCS-12: Treatment-naïve- No46.13 ± 7.23
PCS-12: Surgery-naïve- Yes37.93 ± 6.75
PCS-12: Surgery-naïve- No47.22 ± 6.79
PCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- Yes45.08 ± 0.42
PCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- No45.40 ± 8.19
PCS-12: Surgery - Advancement Flap- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - LIFT- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - Fibrin Glue- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - Anal Fistula Plug- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - Defunctioning Stoma- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - Cutting Seton- No45.36 ± 7.58
PCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- Yes46.56 ± 6.98
PCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- No43.56 ± 8.76
PCS-12: Surgery - Other- Yes47.28 ± 6.77
PCS-12: Surgery - Other- No44.66 ± 8.05
PCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- Yes47.57 ± 7.88
PCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- No43.88 ± 7.47
PCS-12: Presence of Anorectal Stricture- No45.36 ± 7.58
Statistical analysis
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.1217
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.8241ANOVA=Analysis of variance
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.3471
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.9951
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.0631
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.7473
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.4422
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.1796
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.3535
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.1508
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.2671
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.0594
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.5484
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.5387
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.5270
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.3863
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.4206
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.0538
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.9572
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.4742
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.5735
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.3760
SecondaryCorrelation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as MCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables

The following qualitative variables were considered for the bivariate analysis: sex, smoking status, employment status, extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease, Montreal classification for CD disease (age at onset, disease location, and disease behavior), fistula type and position, CD disease activity, treatment-naïve, surgery-naïve, type of surgery, and presence of seton, perianal abscess and anorectal stricture. MCS-12 scores were transformed to a 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as MCS Score Stratified Based on Qualitative Variables
score on a scaleCD Participants With CPF
MCS-12: Sex- Male36.27 ± 5.60
MCS-12: Sex- Female39.51 ± 10.56
MCS-12: Employment Status- Employed35.84 ± 9.17
MCS-12: Employment Status- Unemployed41.22 ± 7.89
MCS-12: Employment Status- Retired45.19 ± 3.63
MCS-12: Employment Status- Student33.45 ± NA
MCS-12: Smoking Status- Never38.54 ± 10.94
MCS-12: Smoking Status- Former31.97 ± 2.62
MCS-12: Smoking Status- Current39.55 ± 4.37
MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- At or Below 16 Years30.11 ± NA
MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- Between 17 and 40 Years36.73 ± 8.55
MCS-12: Age at Onset of CD Diagnosis- Above 40 Years43.16 ± 7.43
MCS-12: Disease Location 1- Terminal Ileum34.08 ± 13.03
MCS-12: Disease Location 1 + 4- Terminal Ileum + Upper Gastrointestinal33.45 ± NA
MCS-12: Disease Location 2- Colon46.18 ± 4.86
MCS-12: Disease Location 3- Ileocolon39.58 ± 4.32
MCS-12: Disease Location 3 + 4- Ileocolon + Upper Gastrointestinal31.89 ± 2.52
MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Nonstricturing, Nonpenetrating + Perianal39.35 ± 7.19
MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Stricturing + Perianal34.05 ± 11.26
MCS-12: Disease Behavior- Penetrating + Perianal42.51 ± 2.35
MCS-12: Presence of any Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- Yes38.80 ± 2.74
MCS-12: Presence of any Extraintestinal Manifestation of CD- No37.88 ± 9.12
MCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- Yes37.64 ± 4.63
MCS-12: Fistula With High Intersphincteric Type- No38.09 ± 9.36
MCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- Yes37.23 ± 6.16
MCS-12: Fistula With High Transsphincteric Type- No38.20 ± 9.19
MCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- Yes45.46 ± 6.53
MCS-12: Fistula With Suprasphincteric Type- No36.85 ± 8.35
MCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- Yes40.71 ± 9.96
MCS-12: Fistula With Extrasphincteric Type- No37.58 ± 8.62
MCS-12: Fistula With Superficial Type- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- Yes40.10 ± 14.47
MCS-12: Fistula With Low Intersphincteric Type- No37.68 ± 8.11
MCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- Yes38.15 ± 5.38
MCS-12: Fistula With Low Transsphincteric Type- No37.96 ± 9.29
MCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- Yes39.59 ± 7.05
MCS-12: Fistula With Midline Position- No33.63 ± 11.63
MCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- Yes36.33 ± 9.95
MCS-12: Fistula With Lateral Position- No39.12 ± 7.78
MCS-12: Fistula With Seton- Yes36.36 ± 9.36
MCS-12: Fistula With Seton- No39.87 ± 7.63
MCS-12: HBI Category- Remission37.15 ± 8.66
MCS-12: HBI Category- Mild Activity45.40 ± 6.60
MCS-12: HBI Category- Moderate Activity33.45 ± NA
MCS-12: Treatment-naïve- Yes36.47 ± NA
MCS-12: Treatment-naïve- No38.11 ± 8.79
MCS-12: Surgery-naïve- Yes39.30 ± 7.45
MCS-12: Surgery-naïve- No37.68 ± 9.00
MCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- Yes31.97 ± 2.62
MCS-12: Surgery - Fistulotomy- No38.93 ± 8.74
MCS-12: Surgery - Advancement Flap- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - LIFT- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - Fibrin Glue- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - Anal Fistula Plug- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - Defunctioning Stoma- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - Cutting Seton- No38.00 ± 8.48
MCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- Yes39.81 ± 9.46
MCS-12: Surgery - Loose Seton- No35.28 ± 6.60
MCS-12: Surgery - Other- Yes46.80 ± 3.98
MCS-12: Surgery - Other- No34.80 ± 7.34
MCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- Yes35.59 ± 10.91
MCS-12: Presence of Perianal Abscess- No39.61 ± 6.65
MCS-12: Presence of Anorectal Stricture- No38.00 ± 8.48
Statistical analysis
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.4814
  • CD Participants With CPF · Kruskal-Wallis · p = =0.3136
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.5808
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.2965
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.2874
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.4269
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.8931
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.9384
  • CD Participants With CPF · Mann-Whitney · p = =0.8286
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.1919
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.6452
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.7218
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.9738
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.2419
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.5524
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.4443
  • CD Participants With CPF · ANOVA · p = =0.4106
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.7795
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.2964
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.3287
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.0091
  • CD Participants With CPF · t-test for Independent Samples · p = =0.3889
SecondaryCorrelation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables

The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation Between General QoL PCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables
correlation coefficientCD Participants With CPF
PCS- 12: Age-0.072
PCS- 12: BMI0.210
PCS- 12: Time Between CD Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit-0.014
PCS- 12: Total Number of CPFs per Participant-0.270
PCS- 12: Time Since Seton Placement-0.185
PCS- 12: Time Between First CPF Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit0.071
PCS- 12: PDAI Score-0.707
PCS - 12: Number of Internal Fistula Openings per Participant-0.450
PCS- 12: Number of External Fistula Openings per Participant-0.442
PCS- 12: SIBDQ Score0.525
PCS- 12: SQoL-M Score0.690
PCS- 12: SQoL-F Score0.046
PCS- 12: Wexner Score-0.259
Statistical analysis
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.8001
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.4532
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.9597
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.3304
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.6333
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.8003
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0032
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0923
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0994
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0444
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0860
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.9415
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.3709
SecondaryCorrelation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables

The following quantitative variables were considered for bivariate analysis: age, BMI, time between CD diagnosis date and date of study visit, total number of CPFs per participant, time between first CPF diagnosis date and date of study visit, PDAI score, number of internal and external fistula openings, time since seton placement, SIBDQ score, SQoL-M score (for male participants) and SQoL-F score (for female participants), and Wexner score. Data was collected and reported as number for all the quantitative variables as the associations (correlation coefficient) between general QoL and the quantitative variables was calculated using Spearman Correlation Coefficients.

Time frame:
At inclusion visit (Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation Between General QoL MCS-12 and the Participants Socio-demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Characteristics Assessed as Correlation Coefficient Stratified Based on Quantitative Variables
correlation coefficientCD Participants With CPF
MCS- 12: Age0.484
MCS- 12: BMI0.022
MCS- 12: Time Between CD Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit-0.132
MCS- 12: Total Number of CPFs per Participant0.077
MCS- 12: Time Since Seton Placement-0.323
MCS- 12: Time Between First CPF Diagnosis Date and Date of Study Visit-0.018
MCS- 12: PDAI Score0.067
MCS- 12: Number of Internal Fistula Openings per Participant-0.207
MCS- 12: Number of External Fistula Openings per Participant-0.048
MCS- 12: SIBDQ Score0.404
MCS- 12: SQoL-M Score0.266
MCS- 12: SQoL-F Score0.039
MCS- 12: Wexner Score-0.182
Statistical analysis
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.0674
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.9392
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.6387
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.7846
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.3972
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.9496
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.8130
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.4588
  • CD Participants With CPF · Spearman Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.8663
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.1349
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.5647
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.9509
  • CD Participants With CPF · Pearson Correlation Coefficient · p = =0.5328

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 10 months 18 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CD Participants With CPF0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CD Participants With CPF
Mean44.40 ± 12.39
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CD Participants With CPF
Female8
Male7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)CD Participants With CPF
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)CD Participants With CPF
Portugal15
Height
Height(centimeter)CD Participants With CPF
Mean168.60 ± 8.28
Weight
Weight(kilogram (kg))CD Participants With CPF
Mean68.45 ± 12.05
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/meter^2)CD Participants With CPF
Mean24.11 ± 4.11
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra (CHUC)
    Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central (CHULC)
    Lisboa, 1169-050, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitario Lisboa Norte - Hospital de Santa Maria (CHULN-HSM)
    Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao (CHUSJ)
    Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu (CHTV)
    Viseu, 3504-509, Portugal
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 25, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 4, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04876690
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2021
Start date
Jul 9, 2021
Primary completion
May 27, 2022
Completion
May 27, 2022
Results posted
Aug 5, 2024
Last update
Aug 5, 2024

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion