ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04850664CBOT-OUDUpdated Aug 6, 2021

Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex (CBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder

A Phase 2 interventional study of CBOT + TAU and Sham + TAU in Opioid Use Disorder, Moderate, Opioid Use Disorder, Severe and Withdrawal Symptoms, sponsored by Evon Medics LLC. Status unknown at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-06.

Sponsored by Evon Medics LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Opioid Use Disorders (OUD) cause significant burden to individuals, families, and the society. Our product - Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT) - offers a cost-saving, home-based, user-friendly brain stimulation system that increased 6-month treatment retention of OUDs in a pilot study; and also, acutely reduced opioid withdrawal severity and negative affect during induction into opioid maintenance therapy. This study will establish its effectiveness in a broad category of OUD subjects at different stages of OUD care continuum.

Read the detailed description

Evon Medics proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT), as an alternative strategy for relapse prevention in patients with Opioid Use (OUD) and other substance use disorders (SUD). This treatment leverages the overlap in brain regions that process smell and mediate decision making. The CBOT is portable and can be used at home. This clinical trial is being conducted to demonstrate its utility for home application by nontreatment seeking and treatment-seeking OUD populations, to engage in long-term, successful opioid recovery.

Key objectives of this project are to: (1) establish the effectiveness of CBOT for improved retention and relapse prevention in a large sample of OUD subjects; (2) establish its effectiveness for acute reduction of withdrawal severity and negative affect early in recovery; and (3) evaluate its safety, user-friendliness and acceptability. Accomplishment of these goals would lead to larger clinical trials for OUD and wider applications of CBOT in other addictive disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use Disorder, Moderate
  • Opioid Use Disorder, Severe
  • Withdrawal Symptoms
  • Craving
  • Negative Affectivity

Keywords

  • Opioid Use Disorders
  • Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment
  • Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)
  • CBOT
  • Relapse Prevention
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 291 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 190 is above the median of 62 across 1,145 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Evon Medics LLC is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18- 70years
  • Diagnosis of current moderate or severe OUD in the past 6 months, including the past one month
  • Willing to receive study interventions and buprenorphine during the study
  • Do not meet criteria for current moderate or severe use of other substance use disorders (except nicotine use disorder)
  • Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety disorders, and Post-traumatic Stress disorders will be included as long as the symptoms are stable, no suicidal ideas or plans and there are no recent changes in treatment of these conditions in the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment
  • No intranasal disease
  • Willing to participate by signing the informed consent form and
  • Have a place to stay when receiving the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any significant neurologic disease such as stroke, dementia, meningitis, neurosyphilis, cerebral palsy, encephalitis, epilepsy or seizures
  • Mental retardation
  • Schizophrenia or bipolar disorders
  • Experiencing current suicide ideas or plans
  • Any unstable medical condition such as uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, and liver cirrhosis, as determined by site PI
  • History of severe traumatic nose injury that affects ability to smell, as determined by site PI
  • Allergies or intolerance to aromas from plant essential oils (e.g. orange and lemon)
  • Breastfeeding or Pregnancy test positive.
  • On parole or probation mandated to receive treatment for OUD.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CBOT + TAU

    CBOT consists of 40 cycles of olfactory stimulation and OFC training tasks, lasting \~45 minutes, once daily over 3 months. Treatment-as-usual (TAU) is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).

    Drug: CBOT + TAU

  • Sham comparator
    Sham + TAU

    Sham is a CBOT device that uses artificially-scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has no OFC cognitive tasks. Similar to the CBOT, sham will be used daily for 45 minutes. TAU is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).

    Drug: Sham + TAU

Interventions

  • DrugCBOT + TAU

    The CBOT with proprietary odorant molecules is designed to stimulate olfactory neural activity over long periods of time. It is paired with OFC-dependent cognitive tasks.

    Also known as: plant based essential oils

  • DrugSham + TAU

    Sham CBOT device uses artificially scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has control cognitive tasks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after baseline

  2. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after baseline

  3. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after baseline

  4. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline

  5. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 10 weeks after baseline

  6. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline

  7. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 14 weeks after baseline

  8. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 16 weeks after baseline

  9. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 18 weeks after baseline

  10. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 20 weeks after baseline

  11. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 22 weeks after baseline

  12. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 24 weeks after baseline

  13. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 26 weeks after baseline

  14. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 28 weeks after baseline

  15. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 30 weeks after baseline

  16. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 32 weeks after baseline

  17. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 34 weeks after baseline

  18. 6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention

    6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.

    Time frame: 36 weeks after baseline

  19. Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at week

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.

    Time frame: Screening to Week 12 Treatment

  20. Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at Week 24

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.

    Time frame: Screening to Week 24

  21. Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 12 severity rating measures over 1 month

    he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 12

  22. Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 24 severity rating measures over 1 month

    he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 24

  23. Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 12

  24. Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Relapse

    Relapse is defined as presence of self-reported repeated (i.e. 2 or more) use after the first two weeks for stabilization of buprenorphine dose, and/or presence of positive urine drug test for opiates. Ascertainment of opioid relapse is through: (a) Survey question administered 2-weekly, inquiring how days in the past did the subject use heroin, prescription opiates and/or other drugs; the dates of drug use; and the quantity (or dose) of drugs used; and (b) Biochemical verification of drug use, through urine samples will be collected and tested every two weeks.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 12

  2. Pre-Intervention changes in SOWS from Screening at Week 2

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 2

  3. Post-Intervention changes in SOWS from Week 12 at Week 13

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).

    Time frame: Week 12 to Week 13

  4. Pre-Intervention changes in OCS from Screening to Week 2

    a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 2

  5. Post-Intervention changes in OCS from Week 12 to Week 13

    a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.

    Time frame: Week 12 to Week 13

  6. Pre-Intervention changes in PANAS negative affect from Screening visit to Week 2

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: Screening visit to Week 2

  7. Post-Intervention changes in PANAS negative affect from Week 12 at Week 13

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: Week 12 to Week 13

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Clinics of Dr. Edwin Chapman @ MHDG
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20002, United States
    • Settles-Reaves · Contact
    • Adenuga · Contact
    • Edwin Chapman, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20020, United States
    • Serlin · Contact
    • Jackson · Contact
    • Michael Serlin, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Howard University
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20060, United States
    • Rai · Contact
    • Hipolito · Contact
    • Tanya N Alim, MD · Principal investigator
    • Mark Johnson, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Maryland Treatment Centers @ Avery Road Treatment Center
    Rockville, Maryland 20853, United States
    • Wenzel · Contact
    • Machineni · Contact
    • Marc Fishman, MD · Principal investigator
    • Kevin Wenzel, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jackson C, Rai N, McLean CK, Hipolito MMS, Hamilton FT, Kapetanovic S, Nwulia EA. Overlapping Risky Decision-Making and Olfactory Processing Ability in HIV-Infected Individuals. Clin Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;3(3):160. doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000160. Epub 2017 Aug 15. PubMed 29057388 ↗
  • Volkow ND, Fowler JS. Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):318-25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.318. PubMed 10731226 ↗
  • Lucantonio F, Takahashi YK, Hoffman AF, Chang CY, Bali-Chaudhary S, Shaham Y, Lupica CR, Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal activation restores insight lost after cocaine use. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Aug;17(8):1092-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3763. Epub 2014 Jul 20. PubMed 25042581 ↗
  • Temple DM. Isolation techniques for pharmacologically active substances (animal). Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:407-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.09.040169.002203. No abstract available. PubMed 4894805 ↗
  • Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20101. PubMed 19235739 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04850664
Lead sponsor
Evon Medics LLC
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Howard University, Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc, Maryland Treatment Centers, Inc., Clinics of Dr. Edwin Chapman, MD, PC @ MHDG
Responsible party
Evaristus Awele Nwulia (Chief Scientific Officer, Evon Medics LLC) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
Start date
Mar 26, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 6, 2021

Study contacts

Evaristus A Nwulia, MD, MHS
Contact
enwulia@evonmedics.org
410-227-2005
Maria M Hipolito, MD
Contact
mhipolito@evonmedics.org
571-241-2766
Evaristus A Nwulia, MD
principal investigator · Evon Medics LLC
Tanya Alim, MD
principal investigator · Howard University
Mark Johnson, MD
principal investigator · Howard University
Marc Fishman, MD
principal investigator · Maryland Treatment Centers, Inc.
Michael Serlin, MD
principal investigator · Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
Edwin Chapman, MD
principal investigator · Clinics of Dr. Edwin C. Chapman, MD, PC @ MHDG

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion