ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04850612CODE-CSDHUpdated Jun 17, 2025

Defining Core Outcomes and Data Elements (CODE) in Chronic Subdural Haematoma

An observational study in Chronic Subdural Hematoma, sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-17.

Sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
184
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is aimed at improving reporting in Chronic Subdural Haematoma (CSDH) research studies, through development of a standardised Core Outcome Set (COS), a unified CSDH Definition and set of Data Elements (DE) for reporting.

The study design includes a Delphi survey process from two main stakeholder groups: Health-Care Professionals or Researchers (HCPR) and Patients or carers. HCPR, patients and carers will all be invited to complete the survey on the COS, only the HCPR survey will include questions on definition and DE. Results of the Delphi Survey will be discussed at a final consensus meeting before results are confirmed and published.

Read the detailed description

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a collection of blood and fluid surrounded by membranes that accumulates on the brain surface over weeks to months. It predominately affects older people and often has a delayed association with a preceding head trauma.

There has been significant growth in the number of CSDH publications in recent years mirroring progress in potential management options but there is wide variation in how and when patient outcome is measured amongst studies. Much could be gained by agreeing a minimum set of standardized outcomes that should be measured and reported in all CSDH studies, known as a Core Outcome Set (COS).

The overall study design includes a Delphi survey process.This is a process whereby all outcomes and data elements from the CSDH literature and expert opinion are presented to a large group of patients, carers and HCPR via a survey. Each survey participant has the opportunity to rank the elements and outcomes in levels of importance to them, and the survey is then repeated including presentation of the results from the first round, in order to attempt to gain agreement between participants on what is important. All elements are then reviewed at a final "consensus" meeting

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Keywords

  • head injury
  • core outcome set
  • elderly
03

In context

Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 184 is below the median of 210 across 20 observational studies indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.

Browse Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthcare Professionals, Researchers, patients and carers.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

All invited participants who provide consent to take part in 2 rounds of survey

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
184 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthcare professionals and researchers (HCPR)

    All researchers and healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients with CSDH

    Other: Survey

  • Patients and carers

    Patients who have previously had a diagnosis of CSDH, and their carers

    Other: Survey

Interventions

  • OtherSurvey

    Delphi Survey on core outcomes, CSDH definition and data elements

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CSDH Core Outcome Set (COS)

    Definition of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for reporting in all future CSDH studies through a Delphi survey process including all relevant stakeholders.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. CSDH Definition and Data Elements

    Identify a unified CSDH definition and data elements (DE) for reporting in future CSDH studies, through a Delphi survey process including healthcare profession and research (HCPR) stakeholders.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Plymouth, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Protocol submitted for open publication prior to commencing study. Final study report will be published at end of study including full anonymised survey responses.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 42 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2021
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
StartActual
Apr 30, 2021
Primary completionActual
Nov 1, 2024
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04850612
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Responsible party
Ellie Edlmann (Clinical Lecturer in Neurosurgery, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
Start date
Apr 30, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2024
Completion
Feb 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 17, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion