ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07912203Updated Nov 3, 2026

Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol (Astra-Zeneca) in Chronic Subdural Hematoma, sponsored by National Institute of Neurology, Tunisia. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by National Institute of Neurology, Tunisia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic subdural hematoma is a collection of old blood on the surface of the brain that mainly affects older adults. It is often treated by draining the blood through a small hole in the skull (burr hole), under local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation while the patient keeps breathing spontaneously. Propofol and dexmedetomidine are the two sedatives most commonly used for this purpose.

This randomized pilot study will compare how well each drug maintains a moderate and stable level of sedation during surgery. Sixty adults will be randomly assigned to receive either propofol by target-controlled infusion or dexmedetomidine. The main outcome is the percentage of surgical time spent at the target sedation level, defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -2 and -3.

The study will also compare the time needed to reach the target sedation, breathing and cardiovascular side effects, sedation failures, recovery time, and surgeon and anesthesiologist satisfaction. The results will be used to estimate the sample size of a future confirmatory trial.

Read the detailed description

Design: single-center, prospective, randomized (1:1), controlled, parallel-group pilot trial.

Randomization: computer-generated list in fixed blocks of 4, prepared by a person not involved in the study. Allocations are concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes opened in strict order in the operating room immediately before sedation starts.

Masking: the patient, the surgeon, and the postoperative outcome assessor are blinded to group allocation; the syringe and infusion line are covered with an opaque sleeve. The anesthesiologist, who administers the sedative and scores the intraoperative RASS, is not blinded.

Standardized sequence (identical in both arms): T0 start of sedative and sufentanil 5 µg IV; T0 + 10 min lidocaine 2% with epinephrine infiltration by the surgeon (maximum 5 mg/kg); T1 skin incision; T2 burr hole drilling; T3 end of skin closure and discontinuation of the sedative in both arms; T4 modified Aldrete score ≥ 9.

Sedation monitoring: RASS scored before sedation and every 5 minutes using a standardized procedure. Target sedation: RASS -2 to -3. If RASS ≥ +1, a cause (pain, hypoxia, bladder distension, position) is sought and treated before increasing the sedative.

Sedation failure: dose ceiling reached for at least 10 min with RASS > -2 on two consecutive assessments; persistent agitation (RASS ≥ +2 on two consecutive assessments); rescue with a non-protocol sedative; conversion to general anesthesia or intubation; persistent desaturation (SpO2 \< 92% for ≥ 30 s despite oxygen and airway maneuvers); or major hemodynamic instability requiring discontinuation of the sedative or continuous vasopressors.

Statistical analysis: modified intention-to-treat population (all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study drug), with a supportive per-protocol analysis. After a sedation failure, all remaining time until T3 is counted as outside the target. Comparisons are exploratory and reported with 95% confidence intervals. Hemodynamic changes are analyzed using summary measures per patient.

Sample size: no data exist on the primary outcome in this setting; 30 patients per group were chosen according to published recommendations for pilot trials (Julious 2005; Whitehead 2016). Feasibility criteria: recruitment of ≥ 8 patients per month, ≥ 70% of eligible patients randomized, titration algorithm followed in ≥ 80% of patients, and complete primary outcome data in ≥ 90%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Keywords

  • dexmedetomidine
  • propofol
  • Target-controlled infusion
  • Conscious sedation
  • Monitored anesthesia care
  • Burr hole
  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale
03

In context

Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 167 across 90 interventional studies indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.

Browse Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurology, Tunisia is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of unilateral chronic subdural hematoma scheduled for burr-hole surgery under local anesthesia with sedation
  • Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥ 13
  • Baseline Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of 0 or -1 before any sedation
  • ASA physical status I to III
  • Written informed consent signed by the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Allergy or contraindication to propofol or dexmedetomidine
  • Major cognitive impairment preventing understanding of instructions
  • Receptive aphasia preventing RASS assessment
  • Baseline heart rate \< 50 beats per minute
  • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block without a pacemaker
  • ASA III with decompensated respiratory disease (COPD on long-term oxygen therapy, severe asthma)
  • Body mass index > 35 kg/m²
  • Inability to understand the language without an available interpreter
  • Participation in another clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    dexmedetomidine

    Dexmedetomidine sedation titrated to a RASS of -2 to -3, combined with lidocaine 2% with epinephrine infiltration and a single dose of sufentanil 5 µg IV, for burr-hole surgery under local anesthesia with spontaneous breathing.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Active comparator
    propofol

    Propofol sedation by target-controlled infusion titrated to a RASS of -2 to -3, combined with lidocaine 2% with epinephrine infiltration and a single dose of sufentanil 5 µg IV, for burr-hole surgery under local anesthesia with spontaneous breathing.

    Drug: Propofol (Astra-Zeneca)

Interventions

  • Loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, then 0.6 µg/kg/h. Increased by 0.2 µg/kg/h every 10 minutes if RASS \> -2; decreased by 0.2 µg/kg/h if RASS = -4; temporarily stopped if RASS = -5, apnea or airway obstruction, and restarted at a rate reduced by 0.2 µg/kg/h once RASS ≥ -3. Range 0.2 to 1.0 µg/kg/h. Stopped at the end of skin closure.

    Also known as: Precedex

  • Target-controlled infusion (Schnider model, effect-site mode) started at an effect-site concentration of 1.0 µg/mL. Increased by 0.3 µg/mL every 5 minutes if RASS \> -2; decreased by 0.3 µg/mL if RASS = -4 and by 0.5 µg/mL if RASS = -5, apnea, or airway obstruction. Maximum 3.0 µg/mL. No manual boluses. Stopped at the end of skin closure.

    Also known as: diprivan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of time within target sedation

    Percentage of the time between skin incision and end of skin closure spent with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -2 and -3 (scale range -5 \[unarousable\] to +4 \[combative\]). RASS is scored every 5 minutes; each score is assumed valid until the next one. After a sedation failure, all remaining time is counted as outside the target.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, from skin incision to end of skin closure (approximately 1 hour)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to target sedation

    Time from the start of the sedative to the first RASS score between -2 and -3, in minutes.

    Time frame: From start of sedation until target sedation is first reached (up to 1 hour)

  2. Surgeon and anesthesiologist satisfaction

    Satisfaction rated by the surgeon and by the anesthesiologist on a 5-point Likert scale (from very satisfied to very dissatisfied).

    Time frame: Immediately after the end of skin closure

  3. Recovery time

    Time from discontinuation of the sedative to a modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 (or return to baseline neurological status in patients with hemiparesis), in minutes.

    Time frame: From end of surgery until recovery, assessed up to 2 hours

  4. Incidence of respiratory adverse events

    Number of patients with apnea (\> 20 s), hypoventilation (respiratory rate \< 8/min or loss of the capnography waveform), desaturation (SpO2 \< 92% for ≥ 30 s), upper airway obstruction or need for ventilatory assistance.

    Time frame: From start of sedation until discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (up to 4 hours)

  5. Incidence of hemodynamic adverse events

    Number of patients with bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 bpm), hypotension (mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg or decrease \> 25% from baseline) or hypertension (systolic pressure \> 160 mmHg or increase \> 20% from baseline), and need for corrective treatment.

    Time frame: From start of sedation until end of surgery (approximately 1 hour)

  6. Sedation failure rate

    Proportion of patients with efficacy failure (dose ceiling with RASS \> -2, persistent agitation, non-protocol rescue sedative) or procedural failure (conversion to general anesthesia, persistent desaturation, major hemodynamic instability).

    Time frame: Intraoperative (approximately 1 hour)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly; anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable request to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07912203
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Neurology, Tunisia
Responsible party
Hammami Rabeb (Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Institute of Neurology, Tunisia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Rabeb Hammami, Assistant Professor
Contact
hammamirabeb2@gmail.com
56442412 ext. +216

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexmedetomidine

Start the discussion