ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04816799STARTUpdated Feb 22, 2022

Efficacy of START (Startle Rehabilitation Therapy) in the Treatment Stroke-induced Aphasia/Apraxia

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START) in Stroke, Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech, sponsored by Arizona State University. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Arizona State University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2020, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A stratified, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of remotely delivered START treatment to individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke (with recruitment focused on individuals with low SES) will be conducted. Subjects and assessors will be blinded to the condition making the experiment double blind. Specifically, subjects will be told that we are exploring a new therapy that using different sounds to improve therapy. Parallel group design will ensure that subjects in the Control group are unaware that their "sounds" are softer than the START group. Trainers may become aware that a loud sound is present thus a unique Assessor will evaluate clinical performance before and after training making the study double-blind. Fifty-four subjects will undergo baseline testing in the laboratory to establish their capacity for functional and expressive speech as well as their self-reported health-related quality of life (power analysis below). Next, subjects will participate in a high-frequency, word-picture verification/ auditory-repetition treatment, 2 hr/day for 5 consecutive days focusing on expression of words of functional significance (e.g., water, fall). Subjects will either receive training with START or without (Control). Subjects will be re-tested immediately following training as well as one-month post to assess retention. Aim 1 will evaluate capacity of START to enhance SLT outcomes by assessing the % change in clinical assessment of functional and expressive speech. Our preliminary data points to a robust response [details]. Aim 2 will focus on the capacity of these changes to 1) be retained and 2) impact subject's reported quality of life. NOTE: While we are planning in-person baseline, end, and retention testing, in response to COVID, we have established remote clinical screening using peer-reviewed validated techniques for WAB and ABA-2 (see Alternative Solutions). All preliminary data collected for this proposal were collected remotely via no-contact protocols.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Aphasia
  • Apraxia of Speech
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Arizona State University is the lead sponsor of 238 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years old
  • Native English Speakers
  • Capacity to provide
  • Right-handed
  • Corrected to normal vision
  • Left hemisphere cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
  • Presence of severe-to-moderate, non-fluent aphasia, i.e. Aphasia Quotients of 0-50 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PsychCorp, 2007)
  • Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender41,42 NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. Based on our ongoing aphasia studies, we expect that \~30% of participants will use hearing aids; we will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe concurrent uncontrolled medical problems (e.g. cardiorespiratory impairment).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    START

    START (startle adjuvant rehabilitation therapy) will be applied.

    Behavioral: Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START)

  • No intervention
    Control

    Subjects will train but without START

Interventions

  • BehavioralStartle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START)

    Exposure to loud acoustic stimulus during training of motor task (in this case speech).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Aphasia Battery

    (WAB) will be administered to determine aphasia severity via its aphasia quotient, as well as aphasia type. Severe non-fluent aphasia will be defined as an aphasia quotient \< 50 and a classification of Broca's, global, or transcortical motor aphasia.

    Time frame: end of training

  2. Western Aphasia Battery Retention

    (WAB) will be administered to determine aphasia severity via its aphasia quotient, as well as aphasia type. Severe non-fluent aphasia will be defined as an aphasia quotient \< 50 and a classification of Broca's, global, or transcortical motor aphasia.

    Time frame: one month post

  3. Apraxia Battery for adults

    (ABA-2) will be collected to identify presence and severity of apraxia of speech (AOS) via its six subtests: diadochokinetic rate, increasing word length, limb and oral apraxia, and latency and utterance for polysyllabic words, repeated trials, and inventory of articulation characteristics.

    Time frame: end of training

  4. Apraxia Battery for adults Retention

    (ABA-2) will be collected to identify presence and severity of apraxia of speech (AOS) via its six subtests: diadochokinetic rate, increasing word length, limb and oral apraxia, and latency and utterance for polysyllabic words, repeated trials, and inventory of articulation characteristics.

    Time frame: one-month post

  5. Stroke Impact Scale

    (SIS) is a self-report scale of disability and health-related quality of life. We will use the subdomains of Communication, ADL/LDL, Life participation, Quality of life, Social Relationships, Depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of training, one-month post

  6. Stroke Impact Scale Retention

    (SIS) is a self-report scale of disability and health-related quality of life. We will use the subdomains of Communication, ADL/LDL, Life participation, Quality of life, Social Relationships, Depression.

    Time frame: one-month post

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Arizona State University
    Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2022, 20 months after the start.

Of 71 non-industry phase 1 interventional studies under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 97 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 23, 2021
First posted
Mar 25, 2021
StartActual
Jul 22, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2022
CompletionEst.
Aug 2022
Last update
Feb 22, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04816799
Responsible party
Claire Honeycutt (Assistant Professor, Arizona State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 25, 2021
Start date
Jul 22, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Claire F Honeycutt, PhD
Contact
claire.honeycutt@asu.edu
4809658453

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion