An interventional study of Experimental: RF Device Arm in Acne Scars, sponsored by Cynosure, Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-07.
Sponsored by Cynosure, Inc. (part of Cynosure Lutronic, Inc.) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The intended use of the Alexandrite laser device used in this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Alexandrite laser device for the treatment of acne scars on skin types V and VI.
Subjects are to be enrolled in this clinical study if they are 18-65 years old. A maximum of 25 subjects will be enrolled at 1 study center. Subjects will receive up to 6 treatments (minimum of 4 treatment visits with an optional 5th and 6th treatment) on the face. Subjects will return for follow up visits at 30 and 90 days post last treatment. All subjects will receive a phone call 1 week after each treatment.
611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 39 is close to the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.
Browse Cicatrix studies →Cynosure, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Of its 21 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (76%) have results posted.
First submitted before Cynosure, Inc. became part of Cynosure Lutronic, Inc..
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cautionary Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Single arm, self-controlled
Device: Experimental: RF Device Arm
Non-invasive radiofrequency Alexandrite laser
Photographic Evaluation of Changes in Treatment Areas
Photographic evaluation with ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading comparing pre-treatment images to the 90 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. This scale gives higher scores based on the number of scars, with the description of the scars determining the weighting factor. The scale ranges from 0 to 540, with a lower score meaning less severe scarring.
Time frame: Baseline and 90 day follow up
Photographic Evaluation of Treatment Areas
Photographic evaluation with ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading comparing pre-treatment images to the 30 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. This scale gives higher scores based on the number of scars, with the description of the scars determining the weighting factor. The scale ranges from 0 to 540, with a lower score meaning less severe scarring.
Time frame: Baseline and 30 day follow up
Blinded evaluation of pre-treatment images vs. follow up images to determine which image is which
Blind identification of pre-treatment images vs. 30 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers.
Time frame: Baseline and 30 day follow up
Blinded evaluation of pre-treatment images vs. follow up images to determine which image is which
Blind identification of pre-treatment images vs. 90 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers.
Time frame: Baseline and 90 day follow up
Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS)
Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) at the 30 day follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse."
Time frame: Baseline and 30 day follow up
Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS)
Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) at the 90 day follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse."
Time frame: Baseline and 90 day follow up
Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS)
Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at the 30 follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse."
Time frame: Baseline and 30 day follow up
Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS)
Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at the 90 follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse."
Time frame: Baseline and 90 day follow up
Subject satisfaction
Subject satisfaction rates at the 30 day follow up visit. The subject satisfaction scale ranges from 1 to 6, with 1 being extremely unsatisfied, 2 being dissatisfied, 3 being slightly unsatisfied, 4 being slightly satisfied, 5 being satisfied, and 6 being extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 30 day follow up
Subject satisfaction
Subject satisfaction rates at the 90 day follow up visit. The subject satisfaction scale ranges from 1 to 6, with 1 being extremely unsatisfied, 2 being dissatisfied, 3 being slightly unsatisfied, 4 being slightly satisfied, 5 being satisfied, and 6 being extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 90 day follow up
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Mar 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2024, 40 months after the start.
Of 33 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Cicatrix, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 20. This study's planned 40 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 206 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.