CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04789694PHOCUSUpdated Sep 28, 2026

Prehabilitation in Gynaecological Cancer Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Physiological intervention and Psychological intervention in Ovarian Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Stage III and Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic. Recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Prehabilitation refers to interventions aiming to improve patients' resilience and functional capacity before a known stressful event, e.g., scheduled surgery. These interventions usually consist of physical activity and psychological and nutritional support. There is substantial evidence of the positive effect of multimodal prehabilitation among patients treated surgically for non-gynaecological cancers; however, no prospective data are available in gynaecological cancer patients.

PHOCUS trial is a prospective randomised trial aiming to evaluate the role of multimodal prehabilitation in patients with gynaecological cancer. Sixty-four patients will be randomised in single institution within 36 months with a 1:1 ratio into ARM A: control arm which will be provided with a basic information and standard of care support; ARM B: active arm undergoing multimodal prehabilitation composed of physical activity and psychological and nutritional support. All patients will be assessed at standard intervals (three times during the trial) by a spectrum of non-invasive tests, evaluating physical functional capacity, postoperative morbidity, nutritional status, level of stress and anxiety, and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the trial is to evaluate the impact of intensive multimodal prehabilitation protocol on pre-operative functional capacity, postoperative morbidity, and quality of life in patients undergoing surgical treatment for gynaecological cancer.

Two groups of patients scheduled for postponed surgical treatment will be eligible for the trial: i) advanced ovarian cancer patients referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery; ii) stage I-II endometrial cancer patients classifying as frail (according to the validated modified Frailty Index), who will be treated by hormonal therapy for three months, followed by surgical treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer Stage III
  • Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
  • Endometrial Cancer
  • Frailty

Keywords

  • Prehabilitation
  • Epitelial ovarian cancer
  • Functional capacity
  • Quality of life
  • Multimodal prehabilitation
  • Frailty
  • Endometrial cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Two groups of patients will be eligible for the trial:

i) Epithelial ovarian cancer patients referred for NACT: a) FIGO stage III or IV disease; b) Patient is not a candidate for primary debulking surgery; c) Patient is a suitable candidate for standard of care combined chemotherapy; d) Patient is a candidate for interval.debulking surgery

ii) Stage I or II endometrial cancer patients classifying as frail according to the validated modified Frailty Index: a) FIGO stage I or II; b) Patient is classified as frail; c) Patient is suitable candidate for hormonal therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Second malignant tumour (under the treatment)
  2. Patient is not suitable for any surgery delay
  3. Patient is not physically able to meet the prehabilitation intervention plan or is unable to walk
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    A

    Patients will be provided with a basic information and standard of care support.

  • Experimental
    B

    Active prehabilitation will be provided, composed of i) three physical activity-related interventions provided by a physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) specialist; iii) three 30 min consultations regarding nutritional status with physician or nutrition specialist; ii) three sessions with psychologist.

    Other: Physiological intervention · Behavioral: Psychological intervention · Dietary Supplement: Nutritional intervention

Interventions

  • OtherPhysiological intervention

    * Rehabilitation specialist consultation (3x) * Individualized home-based exercise plan * Functional capacity measuring

  • BehavioralPsychological intervention

    * Clinical psychologist consultation (3x) * Anxiety and depression scoring * Psychological support

  • Dietary supplementNutritional intervention

    * Nutritional specialist consultation (3x) * Malnutrition scoring * Dietary supplementation

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional capacity changes

    Six-minute walking test (6MWT)

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative morbidity

    Intraoperative and early postoperative complications until the 30th postoperative day will be classified according to the Clavien-Dindo and the Comprehensive Complication Index. Adverse events occurring after 30th postoperative day will be assessed according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  2. Length of postoperative hospital stay (days)

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  3. Adherence to training program

    Daily step count and number of resistance exercises per week.

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  4. Effects of nutritional support program on body composition (weight of fat and lean body mass in kg)

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  5. Effects of nutritional support program on resting energy expenditure (measured in kcal/kg).

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  6. Effects of nutritional support program on Fatty acids composition of plasmatic and erythrocytes phospholipids (measured in mol%).

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  7. Health-related quality of life

    The analysis of the QoL of both study ARMs will be made based on EORTC validated questionnaires: QLQ-C30 and OV28 (for ovarian cancer patients)/ EN24 (for endometrial cancer patients. QLQ-C30 was developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. The EORTC QLQ-OV28/ EN24 is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provides information on an additional 25 items specifically related to ovarian/ endometrial cancer.

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  8. Psychological health: DEPRESSION

    The Beck Depression Inventory: a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression.

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  9. Psychological health: ANXIETY

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: a psychological inventory consisting of 40 self-report items on a 4-point Likert scale. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety and trait anxiety.

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  10. Psychological health: NONSPECIFIC PERCEIVED STRESS

    Perceived stress scale: psychological instrument for measuring nonspecific perceived stress (stressfulness of situations, the effectiveness of stress-reducing interventions, and the extent to which there are associations between psychological stress and psychiatric and physical disorders).

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

  11. Psychological health: SPECIFIC PERCEIVED STRESS

    Stress profile: questionnaire assessing the severity of stress in nine areas of life: social habits, social relationships, life events, sexual problems, sleep, psychiatric symptoms, old age, menstrual stresses, and 'stress and the heart'.

    Time frame: 9-12weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Gynecologic Oncology Center in Prague
    Prague, 12000, Czechia
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Cook PC, Leit ME. Issues in the pediatric athlete. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Jul;26(3):453-64. PubMed 7609960 ↗
  • Althoff FC, Neb H, Herrmann E, Trentino KM, Vernich L, Fullenbach C, Freedman J, Waters JH, Farmer S, Leahy MF, Zacharowski K, Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S. Multimodal Patient Blood Management Program Based on a Three-pillar Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):794-804. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003095. PubMed 30418206 ↗
  • Peteroy ET, Pirrello PE, Adams N. The relationship between two Wiggins Content Scales and length of hospitalization. J Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;38(2):344-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198204)38:23.0.co;2-z. PubMed 7068871 ↗
  • Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Roca J, Lacy AM, Burgos F, Risco R, Momblan D, Balust J, Blanco I, Martinez-Palli G. Personalised Prehabilitation in High-risk Patients Undergoing Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):50-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002293. PubMed 28489682 ↗
  • Beck A, Vind Thaysen H, Hasselholt Soegaard C, Blaakaer J, Seibaek L. Prehabilitation in cancer care: patients' ability to prepare for major abdominal surgery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):143-155. doi: 10.1111/scs.12828. Epub 2020 Feb 11. PubMed 32043644 ↗
  • Benzo R, Wigle D, Novotny P, Wetzstein M, Nichols F, Shen RK, Cassivi S, Deschamps C. Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies. Lung Cancer. 2011 Dec;74(3):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jun 12. PubMed 21663994 ↗
  • Biglia N, Zanfagnin V, Daniele A, Robba E, Bounous VE. Lower Body Lymphedema in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2017 Aug;37(8):4005-4015. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11785. PubMed 28739682 ↗
  • Blackwell JEM, Doleman B, Boereboom CL, Morton A, Williams S, Atherton P, Smith K, Williams JP, Phillips BE, Lund JN. High-intensity interval training produces a significant improvement in fitness in less than 31 days before surgery for urological cancer: a randomised control trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Dec;23(4):696-704. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0219-1. Epub 2020 Mar 10. PubMed 32157250 ↗
  • Burden S, Todd C, Hill J, Lal S. Pre-operative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008879.pub2. PubMed 23152265 ↗
  • Burke SM, Brunet J, Sabiston CM, Jack S, Grocott MP, West MA. Patients' perceptions of quality of life during active treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: the importance of preoperative exercise. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3345-53. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1908-2. Epub 2013 Aug 3. PubMed 23912669 ↗
  • Carli F, Brown R, Kennepohl S. Prehabilitation to enhance postoperative recovery for an octogenarian following robotic-assisted hysterectomy with endometrial cancer. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):779-84. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9734-4. Epub 2012 May 26. PubMed 22638674 ↗
  • Cianci S, Tarascio M, Rosati A, Caruso S, Uccella S, Cosentino F, Scaletta G, Gueli Alletti S, Scambia G. Sexual function and quality of life of patients affected by ovarian cancer. Minerva Med. 2019 Aug;110(4):320-329. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06080-4. Epub 2019 May 6. PubMed 31081305 ↗
  • Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8. PubMed 23395245 ↗
  • Cortes-Guiral D, Mohamed F, Glehen O, Passot G. Prehabilitation of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PubMed 32063398 ↗
  • Daroszewski C, Stasiewicz M, Jazwinska-Tarnawska E, Rachwalik A, Mura E, Luboch-Kowal J, Drys A, Bogucki ZA, Brzecka A. Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1160:11-18. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_346. PubMed 30825114 ↗
  • Driver JA, Viswanathan AN. Frailty measure is more predictive of outcomes after curative therapy for endometrial cancer than traditional risk factors in women 60 and older. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):526-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 28. PubMed 28359689 ↗
  • Ekici U, Ferhatoglu MF. Perioperative and Postoperative Effects of Preoperative Low-Calorie Restrictive Diets on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):313-319. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04157-5. Epub 2019 Feb 20. PubMed 30788716 ↗
  • Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, Carli F, Gramlich L, Culos-Reed N, Sajobi TT, Fenton TR. Effects of Nutritional Prehabilitation, With and Without Exercise, on Outcomes of Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):391-410.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 8. PubMed 29750973 ↗
  • Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, Awasthi R, Augustin B, Gamsa A, Liberman AS, Stein B, Charlebois P, Feldman LS, Carli F. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):937-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393. PubMed 25076007 ↗
  • Goode PS. Efficacy of an assisted low-intensity programme of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training in improving the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):1010-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11451.x. Epub 2012 Aug 22. No abstract available. PubMed 22909353 ↗
  • Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE. Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 11. PubMed 22245711 ↗
  • Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C, Simpkins S, Seymour MT, Selby PJ, Young J. The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu540. Epub 2014 Nov 17. PubMed 25403592 ↗
  • Cho BC, Serini J, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Scott MJ, Gehrie EA, Frank SM, Grant MC. Impact of Preoperative Erythropoietin on Allogeneic Blood Transfusions in Surgical Patients: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):981-992. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004005. PubMed 30649068 ↗
  • Kei T, Mistry N, Curley G, Pavenski K, Shehata N, Tanzini RM, Gauthier MF, Thorpe K, Schweizer TA, Ward S, Mazer CD, Hare GMT. Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin and iron therapy to reduce red blood cell transfusion in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;66(6):716-731. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01351-6. Epub 2019 Mar 28. PubMed 30924000 ↗
  • Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim DJ, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed 23052535 ↗
  • Li MH, Bolshinsky V, Ismail H, Burbury K, Ho KM, Amin B, Heriot A, Riedel B. A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists' and surgeons' perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;66(4):388-405. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01297-9. Epub 2019 Jan 28. PubMed 30693438 ↗
  • Marshall KM, Loeliger J, Nolte L, Kelaart A, Kiss NK. Prevalence of malnutrition and impact on clinical outcomes in cancer services: A comparison of two time points. Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;38(2):644-651. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 2. PubMed 29789167 ↗
  • Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045. PubMed 21878237 ↗
  • Mazzola M, Bertoglio C, Boniardi M, Magistro C, De Martini P, Carnevali P, Morini L, Ferrari G. Frailty in major oncologic surgery of upper gastrointestinal tract: How to improve postoperative outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1566-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 23. PubMed 28669651 ↗
  • McKenna NP, Bews KA, Al-Refaie WB, Colibaseanu DT, Pemberton JH, Cima RR, Habermann EB. Assessing Malnutrition Before Major Oncologic Surgery: One Size Does Not Fit All. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Feb 26. PubMed 32113029 ↗
  • Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Loiselle SE, Agnihotram RV, Ferri LE, Carli F. Effect of Exercise and Nutrition Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity in Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1645. PubMed 30193337 ↗
  • Minnella EM, Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Carli F. Multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity before and after colorectal surgery for cancer: a five-year research experience. Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):295-300. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1268268. Epub 2017 Jan 12. PubMed 28079430 ↗
  • Ohkura Y, Ichikura K, Shindoh J, Ueno M, Udagawa H, Matsushima E. Relationship between psychological distress and health-related quality of life at each point of the treatment of esophageal cancer. Esophagus. 2020 Jul;17(3):312-322. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00710-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2. PubMed 31897762 ↗
  • Onstad MA, Schmandt RE, Lu KH. Addressing the Role of Obesity in Endometrial Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec 10;34(35):4225-4230. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4638. Epub 2016 Nov 7. PubMed 27903150 ↗
  • Pal N, Broaddus RR, Urbauer DL, Balakrishnan N, Milbourne A, Schmeler KM, Meyer LA, Soliman PT, Lu KH, Ramirez PT, Ramondetta L, Bodurka DC, Westin SN. Treatment of Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):109-116. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002390. PubMed 29215513 ↗
  • Papadia A, Ragni N, Salom EM. The impact of obesity on surgery in gynecological oncology: a review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Mar-Apr;16(2):944-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00577.x. PubMed 16681794 ↗
  • Rabischong B, Larrain D, Canis M, Le Bouedec G, Pomel C, Jardon K, Kwiatkowski F, Bourdel N, Achard JL, Dauplat J, Mage G. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in the obese: a fifteen-year cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):589-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jun 29. PubMed 21719359 ↗
  • Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Bodurka DC, Sun CC, Levenback C. Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.06.045. PubMed 15385122 ↗
  • Schier R, Levett D, Riedel B. Prehabilitation: The next challenge for anaesthesia teams. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr;37(4):259-262. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001167. No abstract available. PubMed 32073409 ↗
  • Silver JK. Cancer prehabilitation and its role in improving health outcomes and reducing health care costs. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015 Feb;31(1):13-30. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 3. PubMed 25636392 ↗
  • Wei J, Zhang W, Feng L, Gao W. Comparison of fertility-sparing treatments in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8034. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008034. PubMed 28906392 ↗
  • West MA, Loughney L, Lythgoe D, Barben CP, Sripadam R, Kemp GJ, Grocott MP, Jack S. Effect of prehabilitation on objectively measured physical fitness after neoadjuvant treatment in preoperative rectal cancer patients: a blinded interventional pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;114(2):244-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu318. Epub 2014 Oct 1. PubMed 25274049 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04789694
Lead sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic
Collaborators
University Hospital Ostrava, University Hospital Olomouc, University Hospital Pilsen, The Faculty Hospital Na Bulovce
Responsible party
David Cibula (professor, Charles University, Czech Republic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 9, 2021
Start date
Mar 25, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Jana Stribrna
Contact
jana.stribrna@vfn.cz
+420 224 967 432
Stefan Lednicky, MD.
Contact
stefan.lednicky@vfn.cz
David Cibula, prof.
principal investigator · Charles University, Czech Republic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion