CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04773041Updated Nov 1, 2024Results posted

Dementia With Lewy Bodies - Infinitome

An observational study in Dementia With Lewy Bodies, sponsored by HealthPartners Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-01.

Sponsored by HealthPartners Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
91
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of dementia and is associated with parkinsonism, hallucinations, and cognitive fluctuations. Diagnosis is often either missed or delayed due to physician lack of familiarity with characteristic features, the inability of structural MRI to detect a pathological signature for this condition, and the lack of healthcare provider access to "indicative biomarkers" that are either unavailable at community clinics or costly due to lack of insurance coverage. The role of resting state function MRI (rs-fMRI) as a diagnostic biomarker has been underexplored in this disease. We propose using a novel cloud-based automated imaging software processing program that identifies abnormal brain networks or connectomes using resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). Furthermore, the imaging protocol to capture this data is relatively short (15 minutes) and can be performed at most imaging centers, lending potential clinical applicability to this study. We intend to study dysfunctional large scale brain networks (LSBNs) in DLB by comparing rs-fMRI imaging data in this population with cognitively normal (CN) and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)-2/3 database.

Read the detailed description

Omniscient, a for-profit, Sydney, Australia-based company, created the cloud-based software Infinitome, a program that utilizes data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) together with machine learning to analyze diffusion tensor and resting-state fMRI imaging data from remote sites. The foundation for this imaging tool is based upon the HCP atlas, which has also informed prior publications from our group, including the Connectomic Atlas of the Human Cerebrum (Baker, Burks, Briggs, Conner, et al. 2018). The Infinitome program creates a subject specific version of the Human Connectome Project Multimodal Parcellation (HCP-MMP1) atlas using diffusion tractography. Analytics are performed on both diffusion tensor imaging and rs-fMRI. Outlier detection using a tangent space connectivity matrix is performed by comparing results with a subset of 300 normal HCP subject fMRI samples to determine the range of normal correlations for each regions of interest in a large scale brain network which include:

  1. Locus coeruleus vs. Nucleus basalis of Meynert
  2. Locus coeruelus vs. Intralaminar nucleus of the thalamus
  3. Nucleus basalis of Meynert vs. Intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus
  4. FST in the vs. Area PH in the lateral occipital lobe
  5. Substantia nigra vs. Caudate nucleus Clinical Measures will be correlated with functional connectivity scores to identify relationship between clinical symptoms and large scale brain networks in DLB
02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia With Lewy Bodies
03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is below the median of 250 across 482 observational studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

HealthPartners Neurology Clinic in Saint Paul, MN undergoing care for DLB and subjects included in the ADNI database.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-90 years
  • Established DLB diagnosis
  • Mini mental status exam (MMSE) >15

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other forms of dementia including, but not limited to Alzheimer's dementia, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), etc,
  • Inability to tolerate brain function magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
  • Risk of brain fMRI due to implants or metal.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with DLB

    Patients diagnosed with DLB enrolled from the HealthPartners Neuroscience Center.

    Procedure: Infinitome

  • Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD)

    Patients diagnosed with AD age and sex-matched, selected from the ADNI database.

    Procedure: Infinitome

  • Patients with normal cognition (CN)

    Patients diagnosed with normal cognition age and sex-matched, selected from the ADNI database.

    Procedure: Infinitome

Interventions

  • ProcedureInfinitome

    All patients will have rs-FMRI images analyzed with the Infinitome cloud-based software processing program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Connectivity Scores Between Pairs of Large Scale Brain Networks.

    Identify functional connectivity scores between pairs of large scale brain networks as determined by connectomic analysis using rs-fMRI Infinitome software in order to compare functional connectivity scores between groups. Eight parcellation pairs were chosen as primary pairs of interest. For each parcellation pair - Range \[-1,1\]. Higher positive score indicates greater connectivity.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of Clinical Measures and Functional Connectivity Scores

    Clinical Measures will be correlated with functional connectivity scores to identify relationship between clinical symptoms and large scale brain networks in DLB . Range \[-1,1\]. Higher score indicates greater connectivity. Correlation of: 1. Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and Clock Drawing Test 2. Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and ADAS Number Cancellation 3. PH R/FST R and ADAS Construction Praxis 4. PH R/FST R and Clock Drawing Test

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Nov 1, 2024
Limitations and caveats
DLB patients (n=18) were matched 2:1 to two control groups taken from the ADNI database: older adults with AD/CI confirmed by biomarkers and/or PET testing, and older adults who were cognitively normal with negative results from biomarker and/or PET testing. Both groups were matched by age, but only the AD/CI group was matched by MMSE score. Matching by sex was not possible due to the high prevalence of men in the DLB sample (83%) vs ADNI (46% male).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)
Started193636
Completed183636
Not completed100
Withdrew: Unable to data match100

Outcome measures

PrimaryFunctional Connectivity Scores Between Pairs of Large Scale Brain Networks.

Identify functional connectivity scores between pairs of large scale brain networks as determined by connectomic analysis using rs-fMRI Infinitome software in order to compare functional connectivity scores between groups. Eight parcellation pairs were chosen as primary pairs of interest. For each parcellation pair - Range \[-1,1\]. Higher positive score indicates greater connectivity.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · connectivity score
Functional Connectivity Scores Between Pairs of Large Scale Brain Networks.
connectivity scorePatients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)
PH_right and FST_left0.164 ± 0.0080.374 ± 0.0060.344 ± 0.006
PH_right and FST_right0.340 ± 0.0100.517 ± 0.0060.442 ± 0.005
PH_all and FST_left0.307 ± 0.0090.456 ± 0.0060.433 ± 0.006
PH_all and FST_right0.359 ± 0.0110.530 ± 0.0050.493 ± 0.005
SubNigComp_left and Caud_left0.124 ± 0.0120.122 ± 0.0050.132 ± 0.004
SubNigComp_left and Caud_right0.134 ± 0.0060.112 ± 0.0050.144 ± 0.005
SubNigComp_right and Caud_left0.088 ± 0.0120.127 ± 0.0030.130 ± 0.004
SubNigComp_right and Caud_right0.063 ± 0.010.123 ± 0.0040.123 ± 0.004
SecondaryCorrelation of Clinical Measures and Functional Connectivity Scores

Clinical Measures will be correlated with functional connectivity scores to identify relationship between clinical symptoms and large scale brain networks in DLB . Range \[-1,1\]. Higher score indicates greater connectivity. Correlation of: 1. Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and Clock Drawing Test 2. Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and ADAS Number Cancellation 3. PH R/FST R and ADAS Construction Praxis 4. PH R/FST R and Clock Drawing Test

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Clinical Measures and Functional Connectivity Scores
correlation coefficientPatients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)
Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and Clock Drawing Test-0.50-0.230.26
Caudate R/Substantia Nigra R and ADAS Number Cancellation-0.65-0.01-0.06
PH R/FST R and ADAS Construction Praxis-0.31-0.05-0.02
PH R/FST R and Clock Drawing Test-0.170.18-0.03

Adverse events

Collected over 2 months for DLB patients, No adverse event data collected for AD or CN patients.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients With DLB0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)———
Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
Mean75 ± 6.676 ± 7.374 ± 6.375 ± 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
Female15151141
Male3212549
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
Hispanic or Latino0145
Not Hispanic or Latino18353285
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0268
White18322979
More than one race0213
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Education years
Education years(years)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
Mean17 ± 416 ± 3.616 ± .9916 ± 4.1
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)(units on a scale)Patients With DLBPatients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients With Normal Cognition (CN)Total
Mean23 ± 2.223 ± 2.629 ± 2.626 ± 2.5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • HealthPartners Neuroscience Center
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55130, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 18, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04773041
Lead sponsor
HealthPartners Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2021
Start date
Apr 27, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 8, 2023
Completion
Jun 19, 2023
Results posted
Nov 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 1, 2024

Study contacts

Michael H Rosenbloom, MD
principal investigator · HealthPartners Neurology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion