ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04766866PE37Updated Feb 19, 2025

SFlt1/PlGF and Planned Delivery to Prevent Preeclampsia At Term.

An interventional study of sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation in Preeclampsia, Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Maternal Hypertension, sponsored by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Recruiting at 21 sites in 9 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.

Sponsored by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2021; still recruiting 5 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9,132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

  • Preeclampsia (PE) affects \~5% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetrical care has significantly diminished associated maternal mortality, PE remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world.
  • Term PE accounts for 70% of all PE and a large proportion of maternal-fetal morbidity related with this condition. Prediction and prevention of term PE remains unsolved.
  • Previously proposed approaches are based on combined screening and/or prophylactic drugs, but these policies are unlikely to be implementable in many world settings.
  • Recent evidence shows that sFlt1-PlGF ratio at 35-37w predicts term PE with 80% detection rate.
  • Likewise, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labor (IOL) from 37w is safe.
  • The investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-37w followed by IOL from 37w would reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.
  • The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a screening of term PE with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in asymptomatic nulliparous women at 35-37w. Women will be assigned to revealed (sFlt-1/PlGF known to clinicians) versus concealed (unknown) arms. A cutoff of >90th centile will be used to define high risk of PE and offer IOL from 37w.
  • If successful, the results of this trial will provide evidence to support a simple universal screening strategy reducing the prevalence of term PE, which could be applicable in most healthcare settings and have enormous implications on perinatal outcomes and public health policies worldwide.
Read the detailed description

Finding an effective prediction and prevention for term PE remains an unsolved challenge. From previous recent evidence it seems clear that prediction very close to term may achieve a high detection rate, but there is no evidence as to which strategy might be effective in preventing PE in high-risk women. The investigators postulate that a solution that would be applicable in most settings worldwide would require a simplified, pragmatic, approach. The rationale of this proposal is that PE could be reduced with a single-step lab test screening followed by induction of labor (IOL).

A single-step lab measure to detect PE. Combined algorithms using angiogenic factors with Doppler ultrasound and maternal features seem to achieve the highest performance in detecting pre-clinical PE. However, the need to train staff and change pregnancy care protocols renders difficult generalization in high-resource and even more low-resource settings. On the contrary, single lab tests can be more easily incorporated into the mainstream clinical practice and provide a widespread solution for high-resource settings and specially sub-optimal healthcare systems heavily affected by the consequences of term PE. Angiogenic factors are the obvious candidate for these purposes. The sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36w predicts term PE with a DR of 82% and is a standardized lab test nowadays, realizable by ELISA with widely available automated lab platforms. Normal values in late pregnancy have been reported and are fairly similar among different populations. As preliminary research for this study, the investigators have confirmed that the gestational-age adjusted normal values of sFlt1/PlGF matched quite remarkably those previously published in different populations across Europe. A one-step screening with sFlt1/PlGF would select a 5-10% of the population with the highest risk for PE.

IOL at 37 weeks as an intervention in women at high-risk for PE. Previous trials based on statins have failed to show a reduction of PE in high-risk women. IOL at 37 weeks is an alternative to avoid PE in those high-risk women. IOL has consistently been demonstrated to be safe ( ) and does not affect long-term maternal quality of life ( ). Both the HYPITAT and the DIGITAT randomized trials showed that IOL did not increase caesarean rates or adverse neonatal outcomes ( ). A recent large randomized trial in the US has shown that even in low-risk women, universal IOL decreased cesarean section rates and was well accepted ( ). While in low-risk pregnancies labour induction has been found to be beneficial from 39 weeks (ARRIVE study), in women with placental-related conditions such as hypertension (HYPITAT) or small-for-gestational age (DIGITAT) it is 37+ weeks when the trade-off between neonatal and maternal benefits makes induction recommendable.

Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36.6 w followed by IOL at 37w in those women found to be at high risk might represent a feasible and reproducible strategy, applicable worldwide, to reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.

Individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form will be available with publication by email addresses after approval of a proposal with a signed data access agreement

02

Conditions studied

  • Preeclampsia
  • Intrauterine Growth Restriction
  • Maternal Hypertension
  • Neonatal Outcome
  • Perinatal Death

Keywords

  • Preeclampsia, angiogenic factors, perinatal death, induction of labour
03

In context

Pre-Eclampsia

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 243 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 9,132 is above the median of 110 across 480 interventional studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau is the lead sponsor of 343 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous women
  • Singleton pregnancies
  • >18 years old
  • 35.0-36.6 weeks of gestation
  • Maternal written consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fetuses/neonates with major malformations or genetic anomalies that could modify the timing of delivery or has an impact on obstetric outcome
  • Suspected fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight \<3 centile or between the 3rd and 10th centile together with abnormal Doppler in the mean uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, or in umbilical artery pulsatility index or in the middle cerebral artery or in the cerebral umbilical index (CPR))
  • Participation in another interventional study that could modify the timing of delivery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
9,132 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Non-intervention or non-reveal group

    Non-intervention or non-reveal (result unknown) group: routine follow-up and spontaneous delivery

  • Experimental
    Intervention group or reveal group

    A ratio cutoff of \>p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation

    Diagnostic Test: sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testsFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation

    A ratio cutoff of \>p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of term Preeclampsia development

    Number of participants with term preeclampsia/total number participants.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal morbidity rate

    Composite including any of the following: (i) HELLP syndrome; (ii) Central nervous system dysfunction (eclampsia, Glasgow Coma Score \<13, stroke, reversible ischemic neurological deficit or cortical blindness); (iii) hepatic dysfunction; (iv) renal dysfunction; (v) respiratory dysfunction; (vi) cardiovascular dysfunction; (vii) placental abruption; or, (viii) a requirement for transfusion of blood products according to the total deliveries.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Maternal Hospital stay

    Days of admission

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Caesarean section rate

    number of c-section / total deliveries

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Perinatal complications rate

    Presence of placental abruptio, severe fetal growth restriction (defined as birth weight \<3rd centile), perinatal mortality, an Apgar score at 5-minute below 7.0, an umbilical artery pH below 7.10, need for respiratory support within 72 hours after birth neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage grade III/IV, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy/total deliveries.

    Time frame: 18 weeks

  5. Neonatal hospital stay

    Days

    Time frame: 18 weeks

  6. Maternal experience

    Satisfaction score (PSS, STAI, WHO and Labor Agentry scale).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Incurred costs

    Calculated costs

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Number of participants with Cardiovascular risk

    Maternal blood pressure and endothelial function 6-months postpartum/ participants

    Time frame: 6 months post-delivery

07

Study locations

8 of 21 sites recruiting
  • CHU Liège
    Liège, Belgium
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Clinica del Prado SAS
    Bogotá, Colombia
    Recruiting
    • Catalina Valencia, MD, PhD · Contact
  • Institute for the Care of Mother and Child
    Prague, Czechia
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Medicina Fetal Quito
    Quito, Ecuador
    Recruiting
    • Belén Nieto, MD, PhD · Contact
    • Eduardo Yepez, MD, PhD · Contact
  • Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC)
    New Delhi, Delhi 110002, India
    Recruiting
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Ansari Nagar
    New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India
    Recruiting
  • Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC)
    New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India
    Recruiting
  • Hospital Gineco-Obstetricia nº4
    Ciudad de mexico, Mexico
    Not yet recruiting
    • Oscar Moreno, MD, PhD · Contact
  • Hospital Santo Tomas
    Panamá, Panama
    Recruiting
    • Ameth Hawkins · Contact
  • Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine
    Warsaw, Poland
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
    Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil
    Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Islas Canarias, Spain
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Virgen de la Arrixaca
    El Palmar, Murcia 30120, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital del Mar
    Barcelona, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital Maternitat del Clínic
    Barcelona, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
    Barcelona, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Hospital La Paz
    Madrid, Spain
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital Son Llatzer
    Palma De Mallorca, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital la Fe
    Valencia, Spain
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Hospital Lozano Blesa
    Zaragoza, Spain
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04766866
Collaborators
Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
Responsible party
Elisa Llurba (Professor of Obstetric and Gynecology Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2021
Start date
Mar 2, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2025

Study contacts

Elisa Llurba, MD; PhD
Contact
ellurba@santpau.cat
0034687743699

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion