CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04750837Updated Feb 11, 2021

Platelet Rich Plasma and Diabetic Foot Ulcer

A Phase 2 interventional study of debridement of the wound and platelet rich plasma in Platelet Rich Plasma, sponsored by Zagazig University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-11.

Sponsored by Zagazig University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Feb 2021).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In chronic diabetic foot ulcer, if the conventional dressing fails, new therapeutic options such as recombinant human growth factors and bioengineered skin substitutes may be beneficial, but the cost is a limiting factor. Autologous platelet rich plasma is a cost-effective method that enhances wound healing by promoting the healing process by local release of growth factors.

Read the detailed description

The term "chronic wound" was first used in literature in the 1950s to refer to wounds that were difficult to heal or did not follow a normal healing process. However, the term has met criticism for its uncertainty regarding the duration of chronicity. Martin \& Nunan, 2015, defined a "chronic wound" as a barrier defect that has not healed in 3 months, and Leaper \& Durani, 2008, defined it as a wound that lacks a 20-40% reduction in its size after 2-4 weeks of optimal treatment or when there is no complete healing after 6 weeks. Recent reviews have highlighted the lack of consensus regarding the definition of a "chronic wound" and the need for further researches in this area.

Diabetic foot ulcer is a major complication of diabetes mellitus and is the major component of diabetic foot syndrome. This medical condition affects 15% of all patients with diabetes mellitus. Alvarsson et al. in 2012 reported that up to 88% of all lower leg amputations were related to diabetic foot ulcers.

The impact of chronic wounds on the health and quality of patients' life and their families should not be underestimated. Patients with chronic wounds may experience chronic pain, loss of function and mobility, depression, and anxiety, increased social stress and isolation, prolonged hospitalization, increased financial burden, and increased morbidity and mortality.

Growth factors (GFs) play an essential role in the process of wound healing and tissue regeneration. Each GF has more than one effect on the healing process and acts by binding to specific cell membrane receptors on the target cells. Growth factors' effects include promoting chemotaxis, inducing cell migration and proliferation, and stimulate cells to upregulate protein production. These growth factors not only regulate cell migration and proliferation but also promote angiogenesis and remodel the extracellular matrix, creating an ideal environment that favors the cutaneous wound healing process.

Over the last decades, the use of emerging cellular therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has more attention in a variety of diseases and settings for its potential use in the regenerative medicine as a therapeutic agent and can have an adjunctive role in a standardized, quality treatment plan.

PRP is defined as plasma containing above-baseline concentrations of platelets, which is from 140 000-400 000/μl. PRP is isolated through the centrifugation of whole blood. Simply, its actions are based on the infusion of elevated platelets, thereby theoretically enhancing the biological healing capacity and tissue generation in the wound bed. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay studies of PRP have quantified the presence of increases in GFs such as transforming GF β, epidermal GF, and platelet-derived GF. Through degranulation of the alpha granules in platelets, PRP can secrete various GFs, which have been documented to initiate the wound healing process

02

Conditions studied

  • Platelet Rich Plasma
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers more than 1 cm in diameter that failed to heal in three months after wound debridement and dressing by a surgeon.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with evident local infection or gangrene (no redness, no hotness, no purulent discharge, no osteomyelitis in X-ray with a negative probe to bone test, and negative C-reactive protein).
  2. Patients with end-stage organ failure, hepatic, or renal failure.
  3. Patients on anticoagulants.
  4. Patients on antiplatelet agents.
  5. Patients with thrombocytopenia.
  6. Patients on steroid therapy.
  7. Ulcers less than 1cm or greater than 8 cm in diameter.
  8. Deep ulcers more than 2 cm in depth.
  9. Patients with lower limb ischemia (acute or chronic). Limb ischemia was excluded by the detection of the distal limb pulsations with ankle-brachial index>0.9.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Platelet rich plasma group

    chronic diabetic foot ulcer was treated by platelet rich plasma

    Procedure: debridement of the wound · Biological: platelet rich plasma · Procedure: conventional dressing

  • Sham comparator
    conventional dressing group

    chronic diabetic foot ulcer was treated by conventional dressing

    Procedure: debridement of the wound · Procedure: conventional dressing

Interventions

  • Proceduredebridement of the wound

    The edges and the floor of the wound were firstly debrided, and any callosities around the wound were removed. This was repeated if needed when callosities around the wound reappeared. By this technique, the chronic wound was transformed into an acute one

  • Biologicalplatelet rich plasma

    Part of activated PRP was injected around the wound and under the base of the wound, while another portion of PRP was left over the floor of the wound and let to coagulate and form a gel.

  • Procedureconventional dressing

    The wound was irrigated by normal saline, covered by vaseline gauze then sterile dressing. Repeated dressing every two days till 20 weeks, if the wound failed to heal at that time

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. size of the ulcer reduce to zero cm

    complete coverage of the ulcer base by healthy tissue

    Time frame: 20 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zagazig University Faculty of Human Medicine
    Zagazig, Sharqia 44519, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • GREELEY PW. Plastic surgical closure of chronic open wounds of the leg. Ind Med Surg. 1953 Jan;22(1):22-3. No abstract available. PubMed 13022118 ↗
  • CARLESON R, GARSTEN P. [Wound therapy with septofyllin, with special consideration of its effect on chronic leg ulcers]. Nord Med. 1952 Mar 28;47(13):412-6. No abstract available. Undetermined Language. PubMed 14941406 ↗
  • Martin P, Nunan R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2015 Aug;173(2):370-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13954. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PubMed 26175283 ↗
  • Leaper DJ, Durani P. Topical antimicrobial therapy of chronic wounds healing by secondary intention using iodine products. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(2):361-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00406.x. PubMed 18494641 ↗
  • Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, Carter M, Conner-Kerr T, Davidson J, DiPietro L, Falanga V, Fife C, Gardner S, Grice E, Harmon J, Hazzard WR, High KP, Houghton P, Jacobson N, Kirsner RS, Kovacs EJ, Margolis D, McFarland Horne F, Reed MJ, Sullivan DH, Thom S, Tomic-Canic M, Walston J, Whitney J, Williams J, Zieman S, Schmader K. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12245. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PubMed 25486905 ↗
  • Baba M, Davis WA, Norman PE, Davis TM. Temporal changes in the prevalence and associates of foot ulceration in type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Apr;29(3):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 19. PubMed 25670409 ↗
  • Jarbrink K, Ni G, Sonnergren H, Schmidtchen A, Pang C, Bajpai R, Car J. Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 8;5(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y. PubMed 27609108 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04750837
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Responsible party
Yasser Ali Orban (principal investigator, Zagazig University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 11, 2021
Start date
Jan 16, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2020
Completion
Jan 20, 2021
Last update
Feb 11, 2021

Study contacts

Yasser A. Orban, Lecturer
principal investigator · zagazig university faculty of human medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion