ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04741932InDePendentUpdated Aug 7, 2024

Interprofessional Dementia Care

An interventional study of Dementia Care Management (DCM) in Dementia, Nurse's Role and Nurse Physician Relations, sponsored by German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE). Completed at 5 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-07.

Sponsored by German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
471
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 96 studies in Dementia with a site in Germany — 13 open to participants now, 18 under way, 8 of them phase 3. Dementia · Germany.

Enrollment
28th of 77
471 · median 327
Started
2021
with 1 other
No phase
28 of 96
2 open now
Registered
76th of 96
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 96
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)

Among the 96 studies in Dementia with a site in Germany, this one is the 28th largest by enrollment of the 77 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2021, is one of 28 with no phase, and was the 76th registered.

Dementia

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 574 are open to participants now.

Browse Dementia studies →

Open to participants now

13 of the 96 studies in Dementia with a site in Germany are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

8 more — sign in →

All 13 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 383 Dementia studies recruiting now, 244 (64%) set no upper age limit and 25 (7%) stop at 75 or younger; 16 take children under 18; 164 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 70 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 96 studies in Dementia with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Currently, around 1.7 million people with dementia live in Germany. The number of new cases per year is estimated to be around 244,000. At this time, no curative treatment for dementia exists. The progression of the disease results in high needs for care. Only a minority among People with Dementia (PwD) receive needs-based treatment and directive-compliant care. Previous studies found that more than 95% of PwD have an open need for care. The increase in chronically and multimorbid impaired patients leads to an increased number of patients in primary care. Particularly in rural regions, innovative care concepts based on a redistribution of tasks between specialized nurses and doctors could help to guarantee high-value care at all times. Nursing care can be expanded with regards to tasks and competencies, which is thought to increase the attractiveness of the nursing profession. Unfortunately, there are currently no scientific studies on the effectiveness and impact of such care concepts in Germany.

The Aim of this study is to implement a structured care concept for the reallocation of tasks between general practitioners (GPs) and nurses and to evaluate its effectiveness on the living and care situation of people with dementia living at home. "InDePendent" is a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled intervention study with a waiting-control group. Randomization is carried out at the level of the participating GPs in a ratio of 1:2 (intervention group : waiting-control group).

Read the detailed description

Previous studies found that PwD treated by primary care physicians on average have 8.8 (± 5.04; range = 0-31) unmet care needs, mainly related to nursing care (38%) and drug therapy (15%). PwD had additional needs for daily activities, social participation and showed a high level of psychological stress. The number of unmet care needs is more dependent on the physical limitations than on the cognitive impairments. The progression of dementia is therefore associated with an increase in open and unmet care needs and a reduced opportunity to recognize these needs in the primary care setting and to address them appropriately. At this time, no curative treatment for dementia exists. Thus, innovative models of high-value care have to be found in order to enable PwD to live an independent, self-determined life with a high quality of life for as long as possible. The increasing burden of disease associated with an increase in prevalence of dementia is associated with high health expenditures, which puts additional pressure on health care systems. From a health economical perspective the minimization of supply deficits and open needs of care are crucial aspects to avoid or delay a cost-intensive transfer to an inpatient facility. The overall goal of the InDePendent project is to improve the living and care situation of PwD and their relatives at home. Following this aim, an innovative redistribution of tasks between general practitioners and specialized nurses for dementia patients will be implemented and evaluated. In addition, the specialized nurses will be trained for cross-sector as well as cross-professional dementia care management (DCM), by acquisition of specific competencies to carry out medical tasks in delegation and substitution. Collaborating Dementia Networks and GP clinics will serve as the units of randomization and determine the patients' group status (control or intervention group). The GPs will systematically screen the patients for eligibility to participate in the study during routine care (eligibility criteria for screening: age ≥70 years, living at home). Patients will be screened using the validated DemTect questionnaire (eligibility for study participation: \<9 points). In case of a positive screening or an existing dementia diagnosis, potential participants will receive detailed information about the study including a study-information sheet from their GP, be invited to participate and asked to provide written informed consent.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dementia
  • Nurse's Role
  • Nurse Physician Relations

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Dementia Care
  • Caregiver of people with dementia
  • Unmet needs
  • Medical management
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 70+ years
  • PwD lives at home
  • existing dementia diagnosis or screening result of DemTect \<9
  • caregiver: main caregiver of a PwD (Hauptversorgungsperson)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not able to provide written consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
471 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Care as usual
  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Other: Dementia Care Management (DCM)

Interventions

  • OtherDementia Care Management (DCM)

    A computerized "Information and Care Management System" (IMS) will identify unmet nursing, medical, psychosocial and social needs of the PwD and its informal caregiver. Based on this data, the IMS generates suggestions for interventions: The DCM in cooperation with the general practitioner (GP) develops an individual treatment and care plan that is tailored to the needs of the PwD and its caregiver. The DCM will initiate the implementation of respective actions and monitor the status of implementation. Therefore, the DCMs are supposed to take on activities that were previously usually performed by doctors (redistribution of tasks between physicians and qualified nurses in primary care).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of unmet needs (CANE)

    The CANE questionnaire (Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly, Stein et al., 2019) will be used to assess participants' and their relatives' unmet needs in group comparison between IG compared to the CG. The CANE comprises 27 areas of daily life for assessing the physical, psychological, social and environmental needs of older people. There are two versions of the CANE for both participant and caregiver.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life (Qol-AD)

    The Quality of life in Alzheimer's Disease (Qol-AD; Logsdon et al. 2002) will be used to assess participants' quality of life. The instrument contains 13 items. Each item is rated on a four point likert scale, in which 1 stands for being poor and 4 being excellent. Result is a sum of all 13 items from 13 to 52. Higher numbers indicate higher quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

  2. Health status (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L instrument (Janssen et al. 2013) will be used to assess participants' health status, quality of life and for the health economic evaluation. The instrument contains 5 dimensions and one score from 0 to 100 to assess participants' current health status. Each of the 5 dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression) are rated on a five point likert scale. Result of the EQ-5D-5L is an individual health index.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

  3. Costs of informal care (Resource Utilization in Dementia)

    Informal care is an essential part of society's resource consumption and the costs of dementia care. For the health economic evaluation the RUD (Resource Utilization in Dementia Questionnaire, Wimo, Jonsson \& Zbrozek, 2010) will be used to determine the supply costs and the informal care provided. The RUD instrument was developed to capture the use of resources by demented patients in a clinical trial setting, which in a further step can be calculated into costs.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

  4. Costs of formal care (Utilization of Medical and Nursing services)

    For the health economic evaluation the FIMA (Questionnaire for Health-Related Resource Use in an Elderly Population, Seidl et al. 2015) will be used to determine the supply costs and the formal care provided.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

  5. Caregiver Burden (Zarit)

    Caregiver burden will be assessed by using the Zarit Burden Inventory (Zarit, 1980). The instrument consists of 22 items. The result of the instrument is a sum between 22 and 88 - higher results indicate a higher subjective level of burden.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline assessment

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • MEDIS Ärztenetz medizinischer Versorgung Südbrandenburg
    Elsterwerda, Brandenburg 04910, Germany
  • GNEF Gesundheitsnetz Frankfurt am Main
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60528, Germany
  • Demenz-Netzwerk Uckermark e.V.
    Prenzlau, Mecklenburg- Western Pommerania 17291, Germany
  • HaffNet Management GmbH
    Ueckermünde, Mecklenburg- Western Pommerania 17373, Germany
  • DZNE
    Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Western-Pomerania 17487, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eichler T, Thyrian JR, Hertel J, Richter S, Wucherer D, Michalowsky B, Teipel S, Kilimann I, Dreier A, Hoffmann W. Unmet Needs of Community-Dwelling Primary Care Patients with Dementia in Germany: Prevalence and Correlates. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(3):847-55. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150935. PubMed 26890767 ↗
  • van der Roest HG, Meiland FJ, Comijs HC, Derksen E, Jansen AP, van Hout HP, Jonker C, Droes RM. What do community-dwelling people with dementia need? A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):949-65. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990147. Epub 2009 Jul 15. PubMed 19602305 ↗
  • Michalowsky B, Eichler T, Thyrian JR, Hertel J, Wucherer D, Laufs S, Flessa S, Hoffmann W. Medication cost of persons with dementia in primary care in Germany. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(3):949-58. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140804. PubMed 25125471 ↗
  • Reynolds T, Thornicroft G, Abas M, Woods B, Hoe J, Leese M, Orrell M. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE). Development, validity and reliability. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 May;176:444-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.5.444. PubMed 10912220 ↗
  • Logsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L. Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):510-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016. PubMed 12021425 ↗
  • Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649. No abstract available. PubMed 7203086 ↗
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. PubMed 21479777 ↗
  • Wimo A, Jonsson L, Zbrozek A. The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community-living patients with dementia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0316-2. PubMed 20922346 ↗
  • Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, Swinburn P, Busschbach J. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4. Epub 2012 Nov 25. PubMed 23184421 ↗
  • Kleinke F, Michalowsky B, Radke A, Platen M, Muhlichen F, Scharf A, Mohr W, Penndorf P, Bahls T, van den Berg N, Hoffmann W. Advanced nursing practice and interprofessional dementia care (InDePendent): study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, controlled, interventional trial. Trials. 2022 Apr 11;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06249-1. PubMed 35410437 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2021 to primary completion in Aug 2023, 31 months.

Of 858 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dementia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's 31 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 904 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2021
First posted
Feb 5, 2021
StartActual
Jan 13, 2021
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Aug 7, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04741932
Lead sponsor
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
Collaborators
University Medicine Greifswald, University Medicine Rostock, GNEF Gesundheitsnetz Frankfurt am Main eG, Haffnet Management GmbH, Demenznetzwerk Uckermark e.V., Techniker Krankenkasse, AOK Nordost, Federal Joint Committee
Responsible party
Wolfgang Hoffmann (Group Leader and Site Speaker, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2021
Start date
Jan 13, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Aug 7, 2024

Study contacts

Wolfgang Hoffmann, MD, MPH, Prof.
principal investigator · German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion