An interventional study of Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and Trabeculectomy surgery in Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, sponsored by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-01.
Sponsored by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To compare the effectiveness of lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis and trabeculectomy in treating advanced angle-closure glaucoma.
Advanced angle closure glaucoma (AACG) can result in severe visual function defect or even blindness with or without acute attacks. Different from open angle glaucoma (OAG), the main principle of treatment for AACG is not only to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) but also to protect the anterior chamber angle from closing. Previously, the most common and classical treatment for AACG was trabeculectomy. However, both doctors and patients are not satisfied with this surgery because of its limited success rate due to fibrosis of the filtration pathway. Besides, trabeculectomy has various complications, such as shallow anterior chamber, choroidal effusion, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, malignant glaucoma, and bleb leakage associated endophthalmitis. In addition, patients who underwent trabeculectomy will have decreased visual acuity in a couple of years due to accelerated development of cataract. Since a thickened and anterior-positioned lens could play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AACG, cataract surgery has also been used. Accumulative evidence shows lens extraction alone is an efficient way in treating the early stage of ACG but has limited success rate in AACG. Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis (LEG) has been proved to be better than lens extraction alone in re-opening the anterior chamber angle for ACG patients with extensive peripheral anterior synechia and possibly have better effect than trabeculectomy as well from our preliminary data, which has not been proved yet. Thus, this investigation is designed to compare the effect of LEG and trabeculectomy in AACG patients prospectively in 3 years of follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that LEG could have better IOP control and better visual function than trabeculectomy in long term for AACG patients.
91 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 316 is above the median of 57 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure.
Browse Glaucoma, Angle-Closure studies →Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
One hundred and fifty-eight patients with advanced angle-closure glaucoma underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis.
Procedure: Lens extraction combined with goniosynechialysis
One hundred and fifty-eight patients with advanced angle-closure glaucoma underwent trabeculectomy.
Procedure: Trabeculectomy surgery
The patients enrolled underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis surgery.
The patients enrolled underwent trabeculectomy surgery
Intraocular pressure (IOP) change at one month
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at one month.
Time frame: one month
IOP change at three months
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at three months.
Time frame: three months
IOP change at six months
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at six months.
Time frame: six months
IOP change at one year
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at one year.
Time frame: one year
IOP change at two years
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at two years.
Time frame: two years
IOP change at three years
Change from baseline IOP after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis or trabeculectomy at three years.
Time frame: three years
Best corrected visual acuity at one month
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at one month
Time frame: one month
Best corrected visual acuity at three months
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at three months
Time frame: three months
Best corrected visual acuity at six months
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at six months
Time frame: six months
Best corrected visual acuity at one year
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at one year
Time frame: one year
Best corrected visual acuity at two years
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at two years
Time frame: two years
Best corrected visual acuity at three years
Best corrected visual acuity of participants after surgery at three years
Time frame: three years
Mean deviation
The mean deviation value of Humphery visual filed tests before and after surgery.
Time frame: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years
The thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)
The RNFL thickness measured by optical coherence topography (OCT)
Time frame: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years
The thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC)
The GCC thickness measured by OCT
Time frame: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years
Number of eye drops
The number of eye drops after surgery.
Time frame: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years
Adverse event
Adverse events of each group, such as cornea edma, ocular hypotension, hemorrhage
Time frame: one month, three months, six months, one year, two years, three years
Started Jan 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 47 months after the start.
Of 28 interventional studies with no phase under Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 47 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University →