ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04683172STIMPALUpdated Sep 14, 2023

Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation (tDCS) Efficacy in Refractory Cancer Pain.

An interventional study of Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Cancer Pain and Refractory Pain, sponsored by Elsan. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-14.

Sponsored by Elsan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2021; still recruiting 5 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain is a common symptom in palliative care cancer patients and is often insufficiently relieved. The 2010 INCA report showed that France is not an exception to this worldwide observation (synopsis of the 2010 national survey). This report shows that pain is the symptom that these patients fear the most and that it dramatically impacts their quality of life. These patients may experience nociceptive pain related to stimulation of sensory nerve endings by the tumour. When tumour resection is impossible, a symptomatic analgesic treatment is generally proposed, mainly consisting of administration of opioid analgesics. At high doses, this treatment induces adverse effects, especially drowsiness and psychomotor retardation that impair the patient's quality of life.

They may also experience neuropathic pain, secondary to anatomical lesions or functional impairment of nerve structures (peripheral nerves or cerebral or spinal tracts) related to repeated surgical procedures and/or radiotherapy. This type of pain may respond to antiepileptic or antidepressant drugs. At high doses, these treatments also induce adverse effects fairly similar to those observed during treatment of nociceptive pain. As these two types of treatment often need to be coprescribed, these patients frequently present an almost permanent state of drowsiness at the end of life, preventing all normal activities of daily living.

In recent years, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques (transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS)) have been successfully used to treat chronic pain. It was shown that these NIBS techniques can improve pain in cancer patients in the palliative care setting.

Read the detailed description

tDCS appears to be more suitable than rTMS for the treatment of palliative care patients, who are often difficult to mobilize, as tDCS can be delivered at the patient's bedside and possibly even at home, which is not the case with rTMS. tDCS also appears to be rapidly effective (after 5 sessions) in the context of cancer pain, and this effect lasts longer than that of rTMS.

The proposed treatment of refractory cancer pain by tDCS in palliative care patients is a new treatment modality that is well adapted to hospitalised patients. Each patient will receive 20 minutes of transcranial direct-current stimulation daily for 5 consecutive days.

One arm will receive active stimulation and the control arm will receive sham stimulation. Patients and investigators will be blinded to the type of tDCS.

By improving the patient's activities of daily living, this treatment will enable the patient to return home under good conditions for both the patient and the caregivers. This treatment can also be continued at home. This strategy is consistent with current guidelines in this field, in which the priorities are improvement of quality of life, return home and decreased workload for caregivers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer Pain
  • Refractory Pain
03

In context

Cancer Pain

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Cancer Pain; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 62 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Cancer Pain.

Browse Cancer Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Elsan is the lead sponsor of 68 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient with a confirmed cancer at a palliative stage
  2. Pain whose mean intensity is greater than or equal to 4/10 in the 48 hours preceding inclusion
  3. Pain present on a daily or almost daily basis (at least 4 days out of 7)
  4. Pain that has been present for at least 48 hours before inclusion
  5. Patients aged 18 or over
  6. Patients who can be followed for the duration of the study (i.e. 3 weeks)
  7. Patients affiliated to a health insurance plan or entitled
  8. estimated at more than 3 weeks
  9. Agreeing to participate in the study and having signed an

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Inability to self-assess pain and complete self-questionnaires
  2. History of head trauma or neurosurgical injury
  3. Symptomatic intracranial hypertension (HTIC)
  4. Uncontrolled epilepsy
  5. Impossibility to correctly positioning the medical device
  6. Abuse of drugs or psychoactive substances, at the discretion of the investigator
  7. Current major depression or psychosis
  8. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  9. Patient already included in a research protocol on pain
  10. Patient under legal protection
  11. Absence of affiliation to a social security scheme
  12. Specific to tDCS (intracerebral metal implant)
  13. Patients deprived of liberty
  14. Patients undergoing psychiatric care.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active tDCS

    Active tDCS will be delivered daily for 5 consecutive days with the patient either sitting or lying down.A tDCS session generally lasts 20 minutes.

    Device: Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS

    Sham tDCS will be delivered daily for 5 consecutive days with the patient either sitting or lying down.A tDCS session generally lasts 20 minutes.

    Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    tDCS consists of delivering a low-intensity (1 to 2 milliamperes) direct electrical current by means of a pair of electrodes (anode and cathode) applied to the scalp. Electrodes generally have a diameter (round electrode) or a diagonal (rectangular electrodes) ranging from 2 to 3.5 cm. To stimulate a given cortical zone, the anode is placed over of the selected zone, generally identified by means of an EEG headset (10/20 System Positioning). For the treatment of pain, the anode is placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) on the contralateral side to the pain or on the left side in patients with diffuse pain. The cathode is placed over a supposedly neutral cortical zone, usually the contralateral supraorbital cortex with respect to the anode. In this study, the stimulation intensity will be 1.5 mA using round sponge electrodes 3.5 cm in diameter.

    Also known as: Active tDCS

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    The tDCS device has a "Sham" mode that allows for true placebo stimulation. A simulated session is thus designed as a real stimulation session without its effects. Sensations similar to tDCS are created by generating currents only at the start of the session. Same modalities as for the Active tDCS procedure will therefore be put in place: a pair of electrodes (anode and cathode) are applied to the scalp.To stimulate a given cortical zone, the anode is placed over of the selected zone, generally identified by means of an EEG headset (10/20 System Positioning). For the treatment of pain, the anode is placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) on the contralateral side to the pain or on the left side in patients with diffuse pain. The cathode is placed over a supposedly neutral cortical zone, usually the contralateral supraorbital cortex with respect to the anode.

    Also known as: Sham tDCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale

    Pain intensity will be scored from 0 to 10 (0=No pain, 10 = worst pain) on the Numerical Rating Scale, 3 times daily. Mean variation of the pain NRS between the baseline assessment (Day -3 to Day -1) and the Day 8 assessment will be calculated and compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immediate impact of each tDCS session on pain intensity

    Change in Pain Numerical Rating Scale score measured before and after each tDCS session.

    Time frame: Day 0 up to Day 4

  2. Response rate at the end of treatment

    Efficacy of treatment, defined by a ≥ 20% reduction of the mean Numerical Rating Scale score between Baseline and Day 8.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 8

  3. Residual analgesic effect

    Pain Numerical Rating Scale scores will be measured 3 times daily. Mean Numerical Rating Scale score will be calculated and compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 14

  4. Residual analgesic effect

    Pain Numerical Rating Scale scores will be measured 3 times daily. Mean Numerical Rating Scale score will be calculated and compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 21

  5. Effects of tDCS on pain

    Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire, short form (BPI). Mean variations of scores will be compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 21

  6. Effects of tDCS on general symptoms

    Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Mean variations of scores will be compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 21

  7. Effects of tDCS on anxiety and depression

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean variations of scores will be compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 21

  8. Effects of tDCS on anxiety

    (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (STAI-Y). Mean variations of scores will be compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 21

  9. Analgesic treatments consumption

    Medication Quantification Scale (MQS). Mean variations of scores will be compared between arms.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 8

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04683172
Lead sponsor
Elsan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2020
Start date
May 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2023

Study contacts

Shahnaz KLOUCHE, MD
Contact
klouche@elsan.care
(0)1 58 56 41 71 ext. +33
Marine ROYER
Contact
royer@elsan.care
Jean-Paul NGUYEN, MD
study director · Clinique Brétéché - Nantes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion