An interventional study of Combined HRT and ERP in Chronic Tic Disorder, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-07.
Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Tics are unwanted, repetitive movements or sounds that are either simple or complex in appearance. Tic disorders often have a huge impact on children's life. The investigators have previously shown a positive outcome of tic training combining habit reversal training (HRT) and exposure response prevention (ERP) either as an individual therapy or in a group setting. However, young people and families are often busy, and having to use a full day as to attend to tic training often is difficult both for the young person and their families. Therefore, the present study focuses on the clinical outcome of combining virtual training with training at the hospital
Tics are unwanted, brief, repetitive, non-rhythmic movements or sounds that are classified as either simple or complex. Dependent on duration, tics are divided into transient tics and chronic tics. Tic disorders often have an early age of onset and may have a major impact on a young person's life. Treatment of a chronic tic disorder primarily comprises therapeutic intervention which consists of ERP (Exposure Response Prevention) and/or HRT (Habit Reversal Training).
The purpose of the project is to
When patients are referred to the Tourette outpatient clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, a comprehensive diagnostic assessment is carried out. The assessment is based on a modified version of the Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children - present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL). The K-SADS-PL information is used for confirming the primary diagnosis of chronic tics and for ensuring that none of the exclusion criteria have been met.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria are defined based on the ICD-10 diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems):
Chronic motor/vocal tics (DF95.1) Tourette syndrome (DF95.2), Age spectrum: 9-17 years old
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria are defined as follows:
Patients with comorbidity such as mental retardation (IQ = 70 or less), psychosis, severe depression requiring treatment, suicidal behavior/threats or severe eating disorder.
Participated in tics training based on HRT/ERP treatment within the last six months.
Oral and written consent will be obtained from parents and children/adolescents (age 15 years and older).
The study will be an open, randomized controlled clinical study for children and adolescents with chronic tics disorders. The participants will be randomized using computer-generated randomization based on age and sex.
The participants will either be randomized for tics training with attendance combined with virtual training (group 1) or a combination of attendance and self-instructed training via videos on an app (group 2). Both settings are based on the "Niks til Tics" manual (NISSEN, 2018) that describes training in Habit Reversal Training (HRT) and Exposure Response Prevention (ERP) over nine sessions. Thus, two treatment groups will be set up:
Group 1 (treatment group 1) will consist of nine entire sessions (60 min each), but where four out of the nine sessions will be converted to video consultations. The content of the video consultations is comparable to the information and training the patients would have received if they attended at the clinic and which are defined in the "Niks til Tics" manual.
Group 2 (treatment group 2) will comprise five entire sessions (60 min) with clinic attendance, but where sessions 1 and 2 will be combined into one session with a duration of 120 min, session 4 will be held as usual with attendance after five weeks, session 8 will be held ten weeks after session 4, and session 9 will be held after two months. In addition, patients in group 2 will be given the opportunity to talk to the therapist on the phone. For the group 2 training sessions, an app has been developed for teaching patients the tics training method. A new app session will be released at each new treatment session, and the content of the app videos will follow the information and training, which the patients would have received if they had attended at the clinic and which are defined in the "Niks til Tics" manual.
All tic training sessions will be individual. The primary outcome goal includes the Yale Global Tics Severity Scale (YGTSS) in session 8. In order to follow the treatment, a parent report questionnaire and a self-report questionnaire will be used and evaluated in accordance with YGTSS (Golden standard). The questionnaires are based on Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ). Secondary outcome measures are Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ), Premonitory Urge Scale (PUTS), Beliefs About Tics Scale (BATS), NJR-C (not just right experiences), CATS (thoughts about experiences children may be exposed to), W-tc (worrying thoughts) and motivation questionnaire, and the parents are asked to fill in CBCL, BQ (general information) as well as a sensory profile (about hypersensitivity).
Statistical analyses The primary analysis will comprise a comparison of effect sizes within the treatment group, that is, an assessment of the reduction in tic intensity during the eight sessions. The difference in tic intensity between baseline and session 8 will be assessed at t-test. Effect sizes will be calculated by a ratio of the mean difference and the standard deviation of the difference between baseline and session 8 (SD diff). The confidence interval for effect sizes will be calculated using non-parametric bootstrap with 100 replications. At group sizes of 30 with an expected uniform YGTSS baseline of 25 (randomized) and with an expected SD of 6.2 (from a previous study (NISSEN 2018)), and a strength of 0.8 it should be possible to detect a decrease of point 3.4 (from baseline to session 8), which is statistically significant.
Responder level will be defined as a 25% reduction of the YGTSS total tics score.
The secondary analyses will study the reduction in tic intensity between the two treatment groups using unpaired t-test. At a group size of 30 and expected end YGTSS of 15 (SD 6.2) and strength of 0.80 (from a previous study (NISSEN 2018)), a difference of 4.6 between the two groups will be statistically significant.
Predictor analysis: baseline characteristics and baseline tic severity between the two groups will be compared using univariate Chi test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
Tic severity will be assessed by independent raters.
Using benchmarking, the results of this treatment study will be compared with the results from a previous treatment study on HRT/ERP (NISSEN, 2018).
102 studies on the registry are indexed under Tic Disorders; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 50 across 83 interventional studies indexed under Tic Disorders.
Browse Tic Disorders studies →Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria: based on ICD-10 diagnosen (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems):
Exclusion Criteria:
Comorbidity including
A combination of treatment using virtual tic training and training at the hospital. In total nine sessions using a combined training of HRT and ERP. In four of the nine sessions (session 3, 5, 6, 7) training is performed as a virtual training. All sessions last 60 minutes
Behavioral: Combined HRT and ERP
A combination of treatment using self-instructive videos and training at the hospital. In total nine sessions using a combined training of HRT and ERP. Four of the nine sessions are completed at the hospital (session 1 and 2 are combined 120 minutes, session 4: 60 minutes, session 8: 60 minutes and session 9: 60 minutes). For all sessions, self-instructive videos have been recorded instructing the child and their families how they should perform the training
Behavioral: Combined HRT and ERP
tic training using the principles of HRT and ERP as to reduce tic intensity
Change of baseline Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) at 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
YGTSS - a clinician-administered semi-structured interview including a checklist of all tics present in the past week. It covers five dimensions divided into ten items including the number, frequency, intensity, complexity and interference of motor and vocal tics. Furthermore, it includes a separate evaluation of the functional impairment. Measures the change in total tic score and functional impairment. Interval 0-100, high score means a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline,16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of baseline Premonitory Urge Scale (PUTS) 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
PUTS is a short self-reporting scale with nine items. It measures the tic-related premonitory urge. Measures the change of baseline premonitory urge score at different end points. Interval 1-4, high score means a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of baseline Beliefs About Tics Scale (BATS) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
BATS is a self-reporting scale with 20 items developed to assess the different beliefs children and adolescent experience in relation to tic symptoms and to suppressing their tic symptoms. Measures the change of baseline premonitory urge score at different end points. Interval 1-4, high score means a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of baseline Parent and child self-evaluating questionnaire at 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Based on the PTQ a self-evaluating questionnaire have been developed for the children and their parents. Interval 1-4, high score means a worse outcome. The results will be compared to the golden standard YGTSS
Time frame: Baseline,16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of baseline Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
SCARED includes separate versions for parents and the child/adolescent. Using 41 items rated on a three-point scale, the questionnaire assesses the occurrence of anxiety symptoms based on DSM-IV. Interval 0-2, high score means worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of baseline Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
MFQ assesses the occurrence of depressive symptoms, using 13 items rated on a three-point scale. Interval 0-2, high score means worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of NJR-C (not just right) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
NJR-C is a self-reporting questionnaire with 19 items. The questionnaire focuses on the not-just experiences that are often encountered in patients with tic disorders or OCD. Interval questions 1-10: 0-1, question 12: 1-4, questions 13-19: 1-7, high score means worse measure
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Change of Children automatic thought scale (CATS) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
CATS is a 40-item questionnaire focusing on children's negative self-statements across both internalizing and externalizing problems. Interval 0-4, high score means worse measure
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Baseline Motivation of treatment questionnaire
Motivation of treatment questionnaire is a 15-item questionnaire evaluated on a four-point likert-scale. The questionnaire focusses on the motivation of the child to participate in the training,. Interval 0-2
Time frame: Baseline
Change of baseline Sensory profile at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Sensory Profile is a collection of questionnaires for different age groups. The aim of the questionnaires is to assess children's responses to commonly occurring sensory events and to evaluate the ability to process the sensorimotor impressions. Interval 1-5
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, 68 weeks
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jan 2021 to primary completion in Apr 2022, 15 months.
Of 39 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tic Disorders, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 64. This study's 15 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 39 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 64.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.