An interventional study of DreamKit in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive and Sleep Apnea, Central, sponsored by Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-31.
Sponsored by Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study has been developed in order to demonstrate diagnostic efficacy of the DreamKit device against polysomnography.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the DreamKit device against the gold-standard comparator, polysomnography (PSG). Data collection will be completed within a single visit, in which participants will undergo simultaneous measurement using the DreamKit device and in-laboratory PSG.
1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 306 is above the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.
Browse Apnea studies →Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.
Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (77%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will wear the DreamKit device (test device) while instrumented with polysomnography sensors (gold standard).
Device: DreamKit
The DreamKit device is a single-use device intended to aid the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the Apnea Hypopnea Index
The primary endpoint is the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement between the polysomnography (PSG) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the DreamKit-AHI. The higher ICC indicates higher correlation/agreement between the PSG AHI and DreamKit AHI. The possible range of ICC values is 0 to 1.0. Number was the best option for the measure type because it was a correlation coefficient.
Time frame: Visit 2 (within six weeks of enrollment)
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the Central Apnea Index
The secondary endpoint is the ICC for absolute agreement between the PSG-central apnea index (CAI) and the DreamKit-CAI. The higher ICC indicates higher correlation/agreement between the PSG CAII and DreamKit CAI. The possible range of ICC values is 0 to 1.0. Number was the best option for the measure type because it was a correlation coefficient.
Time frame: Visit 2 (within six weeks of enrollment)
Total participants that were consented.
| Milestone | DreamKit Device Intervention |
|---|---|
| Started | 306 |
| Completed | 259 |
| Not completed | 47 |
| Withdrew: Screen failure | 3 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 4 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawn by sponsor due to recruitment consideration (csa patients) | 39 |
| Milestone | DreamKit Device Intervention |
|---|---|
| Started | 259 |
| Completed | 200 |
| Not completed | 59 |
| Withdrew: Unusable device data | 58 |
| Withdrew: Unusable psg data | 1 |
The primary endpoint is the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement between the polysomnography (PSG) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the DreamKit-AHI. The higher ICC indicates higher correlation/agreement between the PSG AHI and DreamKit AHI. The possible range of ICC values is 0 to 1.0. Number was the best option for the measure type because it was a correlation coefficient.
| intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the Apnea Hypopnea Index | 0.964 (0.953 to 0.973) |
The secondary endpoint is the ICC for absolute agreement between the PSG-central apnea index (CAI) and the DreamKit-CAI. The higher ICC indicates higher correlation/agreement between the PSG CAII and DreamKit CAI. The possible range of ICC values is 0 to 1.0. Number was the best option for the measure type because it was a correlation coefficient.
| intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of the Central Apnea Index | 0.731 (0.659 to 0.790) |
Collected over Throughout the individual's participation in the study, (Visit 1 and Visit 2) and up to 7 days after completing visit 2. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validation Arm | 0/306 (0%) | 0/306 (0%) | 7/306 (2.3%) |
| Event | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Upper Airway Dryness alleged from not using their CPAP therapyRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2/306 |
| Side Effects from COVID vaccineGeneral disorders | 1/306 |
| Mouth/Tongue DrynessRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 1/306 |
| Struck head during PSGInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/306 |
| Muscle strain due to exerciseMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/306 |
| Left Ear Pain due to Electrode placementEar and labyrinth disorders | 1/306 |
All participants that were consented
| Age, Continuous(years) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Mean | 48.7 ± 15.3 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Female | 123 |
| Male | 174 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 45 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 251 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 |
| Asian | 4 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 |
| Black or African American | 29 |
| White | 262 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Validation Arm |
|---|---|
| United States | 297 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global