An interventional study of Multi-strain probiotic mixture of four Bifidobacterium, five Lactobacillus and one Streptococcus species or placebo and Maltodextrin in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea and Effects of Probiotics, sponsored by Children's Memorial Health Institute, Poland. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-16.
Sponsored by Children's Memorial Health Institute, Poland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders characterized by recurrent abdominal pain associated with defecation or a change in bowel habits without any structural abnormalities. Despite extensive research, the pathogenesis of IBS has not been clearly elucidated yet. Recent studies have shown that disturbed gut microbiota may promote the development and maintenance of IBS. Significant changes in the microbial communities of healthy controls vs IBS patients have been reported in several studies. These findings promoted the research on probiotics for the treatment of IBS. Probiotics are live microorganisms which, when administered at the right dose, have a positive effect on human health. The currently published systemic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have indicated that probiotics have beneficial clinical effects and can help to reduce global and specific IBS symptoms significantly. However, the effect depends on the specific composition of the probiotic preparation, and some meta-analyzes indicate that multi-strain preparations are more effective than single-strain preparations. Therefore, further research is highly anticipated. The purpose of the current clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of multi-strain probiotic preparation in patients with diarrhea predominant IBS (IBS-D).
877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diarrhea; 76 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 137 across 738 interventional studies indexed under Diarrhea.
Browse Diarrhea studies →Children's Memorial Health Institute, Poland is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Multi-strain probiotic mixture. The daily dose was five billion (2 capsules/day).
Dietary Supplement: Multi-strain probiotic mixture of four Bifidobacterium, five Lactobacillus and one Streptococcus species or placebo
Maltodextrin comparable in color, texture and taste to the probiotic mixture (2 capsules/day).
Dietary Supplement: Maltodextrin
Oral supplementation with multi-strain probiotic preparation
Maltodextrin as placebo
Changes in severity of IBS symptoms using IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS)
IBS-Severity Scoring System is a 5-question survey that asks: 1. the severity of abdominal pain, 2. frequency of abdominal pain, 3. severity of abdominal distention, 4.dissatisfaction with bowel habit, and 5. interference with quality of life over the past 10 days. Subjects respond to each question on a 100-point visual analogue scale. Each of the five question generates a maximum score of 100 point, and total scores can range from 0-500 with higher scores indicating severe symptoms. A decrease of 30 points is associated with a clinically meaningful improvement.
Time frame: From baseline at 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
Improvement or worsening of IBS global symptoms using Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GIS)
IBS-Global Improvement Scale asseses IBS symptoms using a patient-defined 7 point Linkert scale ranging from symptoms substantially worse to substantially improved. Patients answer the question "Have you felt any change in the severity of your symptoms over the past 7 days compared to how you felt before the medicine was given? The answers are recorded based on the 7-point scale: 1. I feel that the symptoms have worsened significantly 2. I feel that the symptoms have moderately worsened 3. I feel that the symptoms have slightly worsened 4. I feel no change 5. I feel a slight improvement 6. I feel moderate improvement 7. I feel significant improvement IBS-GIS score indicates: improvement if is \>4 or worsening if is\<4, no change if is 4
Time frame: From baseline at 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in adequate relief of IBS symptoms (IBS-AR)
IBS-Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) is a dichotomous single item that asks participants "Over the past week (7 days) have you had adequate relief of your IBS symptoms? The answer is YES or NO.
Time frame: From baseline at 4 and 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in type of stools
ype of stool assessed before intervention and then 3 times a week. Type of stools assessed using the Bristol Stool Scale. Bristol Scale is designed to classify faeces into seven groups: type 1-2 indicate constipation, type 3-4 are "normal" stools; type 5-7 indicate diarrhea.
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in number of bowel movements per day
Number of bowel movements per day assessed before intervention and then 3 times a week
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in severity of pain
The severity of pain assessed before intervention and then 3 times a week using a patient-defined 5 point Linkert scale: point 0 - no pain, and 1-4 the severity of pain with higher scores indicating worse pain
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in flatulence
The severity of flatulence assessed before intervention and then 3 times a week using a patient-defined 5 point Linkert scale: point 0 - no flatulence, and points1-4 with higher scores indicating worse flatulence
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in feeling of incomplete evacuation of stool
The severity of incomplete evacuation of stool assessed before intervention and then 3 times a week using a patient-defined 5 point Linkert scale: point 0 - no feeling of incomplete evacuation of stool, and points1-4 with higher scores indicating worse feeling of incomplete evacuation of stool
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
Changes in the occurrence of adverse events
The number and the type of adverse events assessed before intervention and then 3 times a weeks.
Time frame: From baseline for 8 weeks of intervention
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Children's Memorial Health Institute, Poland