An interventional study of ERA-C70,ERA-C30 and ERA-G5 and ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™ in Varicose Veins of Lower Limb, sponsored by Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-18.
Sponsored by Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of the RCT trial is to determine whether endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter and endovenous radiofrequency closure generator is not inferior to ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™ in treating varicose veins of lower extremity.
This trial is a prospective, multi-center, 1:1 randomized using endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter and endovenous radiofrequency closure generator versus ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™ to treat varicose veins of lower extremity. And parimary endpoint is Complete closure rate of great saphenous vein at 6 months post-procedure.
253 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Veins; 35 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 188 is above the median of 104 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Veins.
Browse Varicose Veins studies →Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
use endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter (ERA-C70,ERA-C30) and endovenous radiofrequency closure generator (ERA-G5) made by Acotec Scientific Co.,Ltd.
Device: ERA-C70,ERA-C30 and ERA-G5
use the ClosureRFG™ and ClosureFast™ made by Medtronic Inc.
Device: ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™
use endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter (ERA-C70,ERA-C30) and endovenous radiofrequency closure generator (ERA-G5) to treat varicose veins of lower extremity
use ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™ which has the indication of the treatment of varicose veins of lower extremity approved by NMPA
Complete closure rate of great saphenous vein
Closure is defined as Doppler ultrasound examination (including color flow, compression, and pulsed Doppler) showing closure along the entire treated target vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Recanalization is defined as openings along the treated segment exceeding 5 cm in length as detected by duplex ultrasound. Complete closure rate = the number of subjects with closure of target vein in the group / the total number of subjects in the group x100%
Time frame: at 6 months post-procedure
Device success rate
Device success is defined as the catheter could be advanced to the target position and retrieved successfully in the radiofrequency treatment procedure. Device success rate = the number of subjects with successful device in this group/the total number of subjects in this group x100%
Time frame: during procedure
Immediate technical success rate
The technical success is defined as target vein closure. And closure is defined as Doppler ultrasound examination (including color flow,compression, and pulsed Doppler) showing closure along the entire treated target vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Recanalization is defined as openings along the treated segment exceeding 5 cm in length as detected by duplex ultrasound. Immediate technical success rate = the number of subjects successfully operated in this group/the total number of subjects in this group x100%
Time frame: during procedure (Instantly after the catheter retrieved)
venous clinical severity score
Changes from baseline in venous clinical severity score (VCSS) (0-30, higher scores mean a worse outcome) in outpatient services. the VCSS was derived by the American Venous Forum from the CEAP classification and provides means by which clinical outcomes in venous disease can be monitored in time.Compared to the CEAP, VCSS is said to be more responsive to changes in disease severity, thus making it great for progressive rankings. It proved good inter and intra observer reproducibility and is often cited in quality of life assessments.
Time frame: at 6 months post-procedure
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire
Changes from baseline in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) (0-33,higher scores mean a worse outcome) scores in outpatient services. The Aberdeen Varicose Vein questionnaire (AVVQ) with 14-question survey was used to determine the quality of life of patients with varicose veins both before and after surgery.
Time frame: at 6 months post-procedure
Evaluation of the use of devices
For endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter: evaluation on the degree of device flexibility, crossability, accuracy, usability (subjective evaluation scale: excellent, good and poor) For endovenous radiofrequency closure generator: evaluation on applicability,accuracy of identifying catheter version, stability in the procedure(subjective evaluation: yes or no)
Time frame: during procedure
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd