ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04637815Updated Oct 22, 2024Results posted

A Social Network AOD Intervention for Homeless Youth Transitioning to Housing

A Phase 1 interventional study of Motivational Network Intervention and Usual Care in Substance Use, sponsored by RAND. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-22.

Sponsored by RAND · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project will pilot test a computer-assisted social network intervention, using motivational interviewing techniques, that can help case managers work with formerly homeless young adults who recently transitioned to supportive housing to reduce substance use and increase permanent supportive connections during this critical transitional period.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to conduct a pilot evaluation of a motivational network intervention (MNI) to reduce substance use and strengthen supportive connections for recently homeless 18-25 year-olds who have transitioned to a housing program. The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate, through a small randomized controlled trial (Stage 1b), the added benefit of incorporating the MNI into case management for transitional age youth (TAY) residents of housing programs. We hypothesized that residents receiving the MNI as part of case management would show more positive changes in their substance use behaviors and the composition and structure of their personal networks (i.e., greater proportion of network members who are low-risk) over a 3-month follow-up period compared to residents receiving usual case management only.

02

Conditions studied

  • Substance Use
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,181 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 399 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 108 across 1,770 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

RAND is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-25
  • In a housing program for homeless transition age youth
  • Past month substance use
  • Screen positive for past-year harmful substance use

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to speak/understand English
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    The intervention will consist of four sessions spaced two weeks apart that will last approximately 30 minutes each and consist of two parts: a network interview to capture network data about the time period since their last interview and a discussion of a resulting network visualization conducted in a motivational interviewing style. Participants will receive the intervention as part of existing case management.

    Behavioral: Motivational Network Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    As part of residency, participants receive regular case management meetings.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational Network Intervention

    Every 2 weeks, residents attend meetings with their case manager. These meetings are customized to the needs of the resident at the time of the meeting. Participants randomized into the Motivational Network Intervention arm are offered an additional discussion about their social networks. Case managers ask participants to answer a series of standardized questions about people they know. After these questions are answered, case managers show participants a series of images representing these answers. While showing these images, case mangers engage the participant in discussions about what they notice using Motivational Interviewing techniques. The goal is to discuss what the participant wants to change and state strategies about achieving these changes.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Residents attend regular case management meetings with their case managers as a condition of their residency in the housing program. These sessions are customized do the needs of the resident at the time of the meeting. Participants randomized into the usual care arm will be offered these sessions every 2 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Days Cannabis Used

    Count of days that respondent used cannabis in the past 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Proportion of Risky Network Members

    Proportion of network members who engaged in substance use or the participant used more substances when they were with the network member.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Number of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days

    Participants reported on the typical number of drinks they consumed on drinking days in the past month.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Number of Drinking Days

    Number of days in the past month (0-30) that participants reported engaging in any alcohol use.

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Number of Days Consumed 5 (for Men) or 4 (for Women) Drinks on a Single Occasion

    Number of days in the past month (0-30) that participants reported engaging in heavy alcohol use (5 or more drinks for men and four or more drinks for women on a single occasion).

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Recruitment was delayed throughout the project due to COVID-19 social-distancing restrictions and frequent resident quarantines. These restrictions also limited the number of MNI sessions that could be scheduled and completed. During the final year of the project, the project team ended randomization and assigned all study participants to the CONNECT arm to adjust for recruitment/session delivery shortfalls. The resulting study sample was underpowered to detect intervention effects.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited through a nonprofit agency in Los Angeles County that provides a comprehensive continuum of care to transitional age youth experiencing homelessness. The agency's case managers offered eligibility screening to all residents who had been at the facility for less than one year. Residents who consented to be contacted by the study team completed an eligibility screener and provided contact information and informed consent if eligible and willing to participate.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterventionUsual Care
Started2613
Completed2011
Not completed62
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up52

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Days Cannabis Used

Count of days that respondent used cannabis in the past 30 days

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Days Cannabis Used
daysInterventionUsual Care
Number of Days Cannabis Used23.7 ± 10.57.36 ± 11.2
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided
PrimaryProportion of Risky Network Members

Proportion of network members who engaged in substance use or the participant used more substances when they were with the network member.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of network members
Proportion of Risky Network Members
proportion of network membersInterventionUsual Care
Proportion of Risky Network Members.242 ± .342.0797 ± .106
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided
PrimaryNumber of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days

Participants reported on the typical number of drinks they consumed on drinking days in the past month.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · drinks per day
Number of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days
drinks per dayInterventionUsual Care
Number of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days2.30 ± 2.253.64 ± 5.54
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided
PrimaryNumber of Drinking Days

Number of days in the past month (0-30) that participants reported engaging in any alcohol use.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Drinking Days
daysInterventionUsual Care
Number of Drinking Days7.45 ± 8.476.09 ± 9.35
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided
PrimaryNumber of Days Consumed 5 (for Men) or 4 (for Women) Drinks on a Single Occasion

Number of days in the past month (0-30) that participants reported engaging in heavy alcohol use (5 or more drinks for men and four or more drinks for women on a single occasion).

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Days Consumed 5 (for Men) or 4 (for Women) Drinks on a Single Occasion
daysInterventionUsual Care
Number of Days Consumed 5 (for Men) or 4 (for Women) Drinks on a Single Occasion1.95 ± 2.892.91 ± 8.35
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months, from the time they are screened / recruited by case managers until they complete the follow-up assessment. Each participant is offered 4 sessions separated by 2 weeks each. After they complete the final session with their case manager, they are contacted about completing their final assessment. During this time, project staff discuss any adverse events for participants who have been screened until they complete follow-up interviews with case managers during weekly project meetings.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention1/24 (4.2%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Usual Care0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline analysis participants include all those who completed baseline surveys. Case managers recruited and provided informed consent to 39 eligible and interested participants. A separate interviewer subsequently contacted and completed the baseline interview with the participant by telephone. 3 eligible participants never completed the baseline interview and are not part of the analysis population because they never provided any responses to any questions necessary for measures.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years241236
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean21.2 ± 2.421.7 ± 1.721.3 ± 2.17
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Female10515
Male12618
Unspecified213
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino13417
Not Hispanic or Latino11819
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American729
White235
More than one race459
Unknown or Not Reported11213
Number of Days Cannabis Used
Number of Days Cannabis Used(days)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean4.79 ± 5.765.67 ± 8.675.08 ± 6.75
Proportion of Risky Network Members
Proportion of Risky Network Members(proportion)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean.24 ± .27.05 ± .07.164 ± .222
Number of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days
Number of Drinks Consumed on Drinking Days(drinks per day)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean3.75 ± 5.453.58 ± 2.783.69 ± 4.68

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Village Family Services
    Burbank, California 90512, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kennedy DP, Osilla KC, Tucker JS. Feasibility of a computer-assisted social network motivational interviewing intervention to reduce substance use and increase supportive connections among emerging adults transitioning from homelessness to housing. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 May 3;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00307-4. PubMed 35505383 ↗
  • Tucker JS, Kennedy DP, Osilla KC, Golinelli D. Motivational network intervention to reduce substance use and increase supportive connections among formerly homeless emerging adults transitioning to housing: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Mar 16;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00227-9. PubMed 33726809 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 30, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Jul 22, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2021 to primary completion in Sep 2023, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2024, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 34 non-industry phase 1 interventional studies under Substance-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 46. This study's 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 57 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2020
First posted
Nov 20, 2020
StartActual
Feb 9, 2021
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2023
CompletionActual
Sep 1, 2023
Results first posted
Oct 22, 2024
Last update
Oct 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04637815
Lead sponsor
RAND
Responsible party
David Kennedy (Senior Social / Behavioral Scientist, RAND) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2020
Start date
Feb 9, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2023
Completion
Sep 1, 2023
Results posted
Oct 22, 2024
Last update
Oct 22, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion