CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04635540EmpathyUpdated Apr 28, 2021

Decreased Empathy and Emotion Recognition in Patients With Neurodegenerative Disease

An interventional study of Educational Brochure in Neuro-Degenerative Disease, Dementia and Caregiver Burnout, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-28.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Mar 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 95 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates an educational brochure tailored to caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, Lewy body disease, frontotemporal dementia, and vascular disease dementia. The goal of the brochure is educating caregivers about the decreased ability to detect emotion and decreased empathy that can be seen in dementia, increasing caregiver competence in providing care, and teaching caregivers ways to manage over time that lessens burden and improves quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The 1.5-hour initial visit will involve the caregiver completing questionnaires, structured interviews, and a computer task, and the person with dementia completing a computer task. A 20-30 minute follow-up phone call with the caregiver one month after the initial visit will involve completing questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuro-Degenerative Disease
  • Dementia
  • Caregiver Burnout
  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
  • Parkinson Disease
  • Vascular Dementia
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 95 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All caregivers who visit the UHN Memory Clinic with a patient with a neurodegenerative disease will be asked to participate.
  • The patient must be aged 50 to 95 (inclusive) and speak English
  • The caregiver must be aged 30 to 95 (inclusive) and speak English.
  • The patients must have a diagnosis of one of the following conditions: Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease/Dementia with Lewy Body, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration-syndromes or Vascular Dementia.
  • The patient must have a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of 10-25

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not English speaking.
  • Patients who do not have a caregiver that would be able to participate in the study.
  • Caregivers who do not have a patient being followed at the UHN Memory Clinic
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional Arm

    The Interventional Arm will receive the educational brochure and complete the study tasks and questionnaires.

    Behavioral: Educational Brochure

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducational Brochure

    Educational brochure on decreased empathy and emotion recognition in patients with neurodegenerative disease

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abbreviated form of the Emotion Evaluation Test (EET) from The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT)

    Subjects watch brief (∼ 20s) videos of actors performing semantically neutral scripts portraying one of the seven basic emotions (happy, surprised, neutral, sad, anxious, frightened, revolted), and must choose the correct emotion. The maximum score is 14 and lower scores on this test indicate greater impairment in emotion recognition. Patients and caregivers will be tested separately in a quiet room. No feedback is provided after each clip. Caregivers will be asked to predict the patient's response after each clip. A caregiver accuracy score will be computed by subtracting the patient's actual TASIT-EET score and the caregiver's predicted TASIT-EET score.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  2. Value of educational material

    The caregivers will rate the brochure's quality by answering a 7-item questionnaire. The maximum score is 35, with higher scores indicating better quality and helpfulness of the educational brochure.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  3. Change in understanding before and after reading the educational material

    The caregivers will rate their understanding of decreased empathy and emotion recognition changes in people with neurodegenerative disease by answering a 5-item questionnaire. The maximum score is 25 and higher scores will indicate that the caregiver perceives the patient as capable of recognizing the emotions of other people very well.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and 1 month after the Baseline visit

  4. Caregiver empathy assessment of patient

    Empathy will be evaluated using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), which measures both the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy. Informants fill out a 28-item self report questionnaire describing the subject's current characteristics. Scores range from 28-140. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  5. Caregiver functional assessment of patient

    Functional capacity will be evaluated with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Informants fill out a 10-item questionnaire describing the patient's current functional capacity. Scores range from 0-30 with a cut-off score of 9 indicating impaired function and possible cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  6. Caregiver neuropsychiatric assessment of patient

    The neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) will be administered to caregivers to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in individuals with dementia. The NPI assesses the presence of the following NPS over the period of four weeks: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria/elation, apathy indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behaviour, sleep, and appetite and eating disorder. Caregivers are asked about the frequency (4-point scale) and severity (3-point scale) of these symptoms and on caregiver distress. A total score for each symptom is obtained by multiplying the frequency and severity score, giving a maximum score of 144 with higher scores reflecting increased frequency and severity of NPS. Lastly, caregiver distress is rated on a 6-point scale.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  7. Caregiver staging of dementia severity assessment of patient

    The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) modified version assesses 8 domains of global dementia using a five-point scale, including: memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care, behavioural comportment and personality, and language. It is used as a staging scale to assess the severity of dementia. It is performed through a semi-structured analysis with a caregiver. The CDR sum of boxes will be used in the analysis. The maximum sum of boxes is 24 with higher scores showing increased impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit

  8. Change in caregiver burden at 1 month

    The Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) assesses caregiver burden in individuals caring for patients with dementia. The caregivers filled out a 22-item ZBI questionnaire to evaluate the amount of stress experienced by them due to the person's dementia. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, and a total score is calculated by taking the sum of individual statements. The score ranges from 0-88 and higher scores on the ZBI indicates increased burden. The change in score from the initial appointment and 1 month follow up will be used in analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and 1 month after the Baseline Visit

  9. Change in caregiver mood symptoms at 1 month

    The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) assesses mood and depression in geriatric patients and will be used for caregivers 50 years old and above. Scores range from 0-15 with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) assesses depression, anxiety, and stress and can be used in adults and geriatric patients. The DASS will be used for all caregivers aged 30 years and above. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating increased symptoms of depression. The change in score from the initial appointment and 1 month follow up will be used in analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and 1 month after the Baseline Visit

  10. Change in caregiver quality of life at 1 month

    The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) is a 26-item, self-reported quality of life measure, which measures quality of life in four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Answers are rated on a scale of 1-5, where numbers can be in order of increasing satisfaction or decreasing satisfaction depending on the domain and questionnaire item. The score range is from 26-130 with higher scores indicating increased quality of life satisfaction. The change in score from the initial appointment and 1 month follow up will be used in analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and 1 month after the Baseline Visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    Number of individuals signing consent/number of individuals approached

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Retention Rate

    Number of those who remain in study/number of participants who have signed consent at the beginning of the study

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Completion Rate

    Number of dyads with completed questionnaire/total subject population (For a questionnaire to be complete, every question must be answered).

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Mar 18, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Mar 18, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04635540
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2020
Start date
Jul 22, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 28, 2021

Study contacts

Carmela Tartaglia, MD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion