ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04631978Updated Nov 18, 2020

Analysis of Retinochoroidal Vasculature in Underweight Women Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

An observational study in Cachexia and Underweight, sponsored by Akdeniz University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-18.

Sponsored by Akdeniz University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cachectic patients and controls undergoing a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination. The imaging of all subjects is undertaken using a commercial OCTA device with a scan rate of 70,000 A-scans/s, scan beam wavelength of 840 ± 10 nm and bandwidth of 45 nm. All measurements are performed between 10:00 and 12:00 on the same day. The OCTA images are independently graded and assessed by two retinal specialists. The software automatically segmented these full-thickness retinal scans into the superficial and deep inner retinal vascular plexuses, outer retina, and choriocapillaris (CC). The vascular density in the superficial and deep retinal vascular zones is calculated automatically by the software, and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and foveal density (FD) are also automatically determined. Choroidal thickness is calculated manually by two retinal specialists, and the average value was used.

Read the detailed description

Cachectic patients and controls undergoing a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, including the measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error (KR-8900; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), intraocular pressure (IOP, Full Auto Tonometer TX-F; Topcon), axial length (AL, Lenstar LS 900, Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland), slit lamp examination of the anterior segment, dilated fundus examination, and OCTA imaging (Optovue RTVue XR 100 Avanti, Freemont, California, USA) are included in the study. To calculate BMI, height is measured using a standard anthropometric tape (Bioplus Stature Meter, model number IND/09/2005/815), and a certified electronic weighing scale (model number Omron HN-283) is used to measure weight.

According to the national guidelines, the patients are classified into two underweight groups: Group 1 consisting of those with a BMI of \<17.00 kg/m2 and Group 2 comprising those with a BMI of 17.00 to 18.49 kg/m2. The control group is formed with individuals with a normal BMI (18.50 to 24.99 kg/m2).

The right eye of each participant is included in the study. If the right eye meets any of the exclusion criteria, then the left eye is selected for the sample. The inclusion criteria for the patient group is being underweight (BMI \< 18.50 kg/m2). The exclusion criteria for all groups are as follows: refractive error >+3.0 diopters (D) or \<-3.0 D spherical equivalent; poor image quality \<60 due to unstable fixation; IOP > 21 mm Hg; longer AL (>25 mm); pre-existing ophthalmic pathologies; prior ocular surgery; and a systemic chronic disease that can cause underweight or retinopathy, such as cancer, malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus.

OCTA

The imaging of all subjects is undertaken using a commercial OCTA device with a scan rate of 70,000 A-scans/s, scan beam wavelength of 840 ± 10 nm and bandwidth of 45 nm. This device can perform 70 000 A-scans/s per second to acquire volumes of 304 × 304 A-scans. All measurements are performed between 10:00 and 12:00 on the same day.

To evaluate the vascular structures, 6×6 mm OCTA software is used. The split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm is performed in all participants. The images of poor quality (signal strength index (SSI) \< 8) with either significant motion artifact or incorrect segmentation are excluded. The OCTA images are independently graded and assessed by two retinal specialists. The software automatically segmented these full-thickness retinal scans into the superficial and deep inner retinal vascular plexuses, outer retina, and choriocapillaris (CC). The vascular density in the superficial and deep retinal vascular zones is calculated automatically by the software, and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and foveal density (FD) are also automatically determined. The same software also calculates the flow index rates in a central circular zone of 3.144 mm² in the outer retina and CC segments. Choroidal thickness is calculated manually by two retinal specialists, and the average value was used.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cachexia
  • Underweight

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cachexia

331 studies on the registry are indexed under Cachexia; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 150 across 88 observational studies indexed under Cachexia.

Browse Cachexia studies →

Lead sponsor

Akdeniz University is the lead sponsor of 297 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study population includes a convenience sampling from the patients admitted to outpatient clinic between June 2020 and August 2020.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Underweight ( \< 18.50 kg/m2).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refractive error >+3.0 diopters (D) or \<-3.0 D spherical equivalent;
  • poor image quality \<60 due to unstable fixation
  • IOP > 21 mm Hg
  • longer AL (>25 mm)
  • pre-existing ophthalmic pathologies
  • prior ocular surgery
  • a systemic chronic disease that can cause underweight or retinopathy, such as cancer, malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Underweight

    Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination

    Diagnostic Test: Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination

  • Control

    Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination

    Diagnostic Test: Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testComprehensive ophthalmologic examination

    Measurements of best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, intraocular pressure, axial length, slit lamp examination of the anterior segment, dilated fundus examination, and optical coherence tomography angiography imaging.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Choriocapillaris flow area

    Choriocapillaris flow area assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography

    Time frame: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subfoveal choroidal thickness

    Subfoveal choroidal thickness assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  2. Vessel density

    Vessel density assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  3. Foveal avascular zone

    Foveal avascular zone assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  4. Subfoveal central macular thickness

    Subfoveal central macular thickness assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography

    Time frame: 10 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aslı Çentinkaya Yaprak
    Antalya, 070059, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2020 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 2 months.

Of 38 observational studies under Cachexia, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 11, 2020
First posted
Nov 17, 2020
StartActual
Jun 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Aug 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 30, 2020
Last update
Nov 18, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04631978
Lead sponsor
Akdeniz University
Responsible party
Aslı Çetinkaya Yaprak (Principal Investigator, Akdeniz University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2020
Start date
Jun 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2020
Completion
Aug 30, 2020
Last update
Nov 18, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion